yeah - they didn't meet our policy for listing on the provider page.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Robert Dale wrote:
> Ok, I see it now. I was looking at 'providers'
> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/providers.html
>
> Robert Dale
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Mallette
> wrote:
>
Ok, I see it now. I was looking at 'providers'
http://tinkerpop.apache.org/providers.html
Robert Dale
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> it's already on the home page
>
> https://github.com/SteelBridgeLabs/neo4j-gremlin-bolt
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Robert Da
it's already on the home page
https://github.com/SteelBridgeLabs/neo4j-gremlin-bolt
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Robert Dale wrote:
> Stephen, when this is added, could you send out the URL? Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Stephen Mallette
> wrote:
>
> > It looks like neo4j-g
Stephen, when this is added, could you send out the URL? Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> It looks like neo4j-gremlin-bolt meets our policy for adding it to our
> provider index. I asked the maintainer if he'd like it added and the answer
> was "yes". Unless th
It looks like neo4j-gremlin-bolt meets our policy for adding it to our
provider index. I asked the maintainer if he'd like it added and the answer
was "yes". Unless there are objections in the next 72 hours (Sunday,
October 23, 2016 at 10am EST), I will assume lazy consensus and add it to
the index
