Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
`docker/build.sh -t -i -n` succeeded.
VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
I'm cool with that change. I still have to run a `docker/build.sh -t -i -n`
though - will do so as soon as I have the resources available (unless someone
else volunteers).
---
If your project i
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
When I go to merge, I will change the method name to `selectV3d2()` so if
you want to vote :) ... Also, I think we need @dkuppitz and @robertdale
and @mhfrantz to have a look and vote too.
-
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
ok - if it's trivial, then perhaps not worrying about.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
The only difference is `select(Pop.mix,...)` (that is `selectV3d2()`) and
there are 6 or so tests that test it in `RangeTest` and `TailTest`. I can
explicitly make them use the method `selectV3d2()`
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/482
It should be `selectV3d2()` given that it will yield backward compatibility
to 3.2.x.
Maybe I missed it, but are there any tests for `selectV3d2()` - at least
something to exercise th
