Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/495
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/495
VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/495
Since this PR touches `FilterRankingStrategyTest`s, it would be nice to
have this issue fixed as well (and have some tests added to cover this
scenario):
```
gremlin> g = TinkerFacto
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/495
VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/495
We could. However, its such a rare situation too much
optimization?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/495
Yea, looks better now. Not sure if we should really keep all the steps in
`g.V(1).outE('knows').hasLabel('created').more().bla()`. It's like the Java
compiler would keep stuff within a `if (false
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/495
Alright, looks like I pulled too early, just got some more changes coming
through. I will retest the latest.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/495
What you have in your examples is the "bug" that is fixed in this PR:
```
gremlin> g.V(1).outE('knows').hasLabel('created')
gremlin>
```
Likewise:
```
gremli
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/495
```
gremlin> g.V(1).outE("knows")
==>e[7][1-knows->2]
==>e[8][1-knows->4]
gremlin> g.V(1).outE("knows").hasLabel("created")
==>e[9][1-created->3]
```
This is still
