Github user twilmes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/521
VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user lvca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/521
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/521
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/521
I think I'm done - It's already implemented on `Traversal.close()`. I think
it's good for vote. Don't think i'm missing anything.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/521
Nice. Clean backwards compatible `GraphStep.close()` method which uses
`instanceof`.
Are you looking for a VOTE now or are you still building on this PR? --
e.g. integrating it with `Traver
