the
> queries.
> >>> Can really think of a solution though.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Pieter
> >>>
> >>> On 21/01/2017 21:14, Daniel Kuppitz wrote:
> >>>> Hi Pieter,
> >>>>
> >>>> forEachRema
loop.
>>>> However, the same behavior is seen when you replace forEachRemaining
>>> with a
>>>> sideEffect lambda step. Not sure what the expected behavior is / should
>>> be,
>>>> but I think I prefer the way it's done now.
>>
loop.
>>>> However, the same behavior is seen when you replace forEachRemaining
>>> with a
>>>> sideEffect lambda step. Not sure what the expected behavior is / should
>>> be,
>>>> but I think I prefer the way it's done now.
>>
iel
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:30 PM, pieter-gmail <pieter.mar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to clarify the expected semantics of gremlin's lazy iteration
>> semantics.
>> The following gremlin is what highlighted it.
>>
is / should be,
but I think I prefer the way it's done now.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:30 PM, pieter-gmail <pieter.mar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to clarify the expected semantics of gremlin's lazy iteration
> semantics.
> The following gremli
Hi,
I need to clarify the expected semantics of gremlin's lazy iteration
semantics.
The following gremlin is what highlighted it.
```
@Test
public void testLazy() {
final TinkerGraph graph = TinkerGraph.open();
final Vertex a1 = graph.addVertex(T.label
