As most of you probably know FOSDEM 2016 (the biggest,
100% free open source developer conference) is right
around the corner:
https://fosdem.org/2016/
We hope to have an ASF booth and we would love to see as
many ASF projects as possible present at various tracks
(AKA Developer rooms):
htt
This might be far more heavy-weight than what you are looking for, but I've
been working on implementing the LDBC Social Network Benchmark for TP3:
http://ldbcouncil.org/developer/snb
Jonathan
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:28 AM Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> I had long ago built in a model for doing
Marvin, can you please elaborate? Is there a particular test that's
causing a problem where supportsSchema() could help make something easier
on your end?
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Froeder wrote:
> One problem we had on orientDB is to have schemas + transactions. OrientDB
> suppo
I just committed the first bit of upgrade docs for 3.1.1-incubating. There
were a lot of additions already (at least from my end). Didn't meant to
let it go for so long. Probably should have rolled it into my PRs - that's
probably the best way to do this so that nothing is missed.
https://githu
If I understand correctly, Marko wants the iterator to return the same
vertices, no matter what happens with the graph in the meantime. I agree
with that behaviour and was actually surprised to hear that it doesn't
do that. To tell us the truth I just added a test, and that proves the
static be
Right now I would not be easy...
@mpollmeier you probably would be best to answer that one.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Marko Rodriguez
wrote:
> Marvin, how hard (inefficient) would it be to make it so the iterator of
> OrientDB's TinkerPop implementation is "static." I would prefer to hav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032624#comment-15032624
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP3-1011:
Another solution to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez updated TINKERPOP3-1011:
---
Description:
We need to generalize {{HadoopElementIterator}} to support n
Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP3-1011:
--
Summary: HadoopGraph can't re-attach when the InputFormat is not a
FileInputFormat
Key: TINKERPOP3-1011
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1
Hi,
I personally like the symmetry between edge and vertex labels. If you want to
"change a label" for an edge, you have to delete the edge and create a new one
with the label you want. Likewise for vertices. With this, label-methods fall
nicely from Element. Finally, realize that there are als
stephen mallette created TINKERPOP3-1010:
Summary: Remove deprecated credentialsDbLocation for
SimpleAuthenticator
Key: TINKERPOP3-1010
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1010
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP3-981.
---
Resolution: Implemented
> Deprecate support for credentialsDbLocation in Gremlin S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032574#comment-15032574
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-981:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
Marvin, how hard (inefficient) would it be to make it so the iterator of
OrientDB's TinkerPop implementation is "static." I would prefer to have
consistent behavior on this front for all providers as opposed to adding yet
another Feature distinction.
Thoughts?,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/160
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032569#comment-15032569
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-978:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP3-978.
---
Resolution: Implemented
> Native TinkerGraph Serializers for GraphSON
> --
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/147
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032521#comment-15032521
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-978:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/147#issuecomment-160769892
Fixed with the above commit @pluradj - merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032478#comment-15032478
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-981:
---
Github user pluradj commented o
Github user pluradj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/160#issuecomment-160763774
Ran clean install, followed by integration tests against gremlin-server.
Ran a couple manual tests with gremlin console and REST.
VOTE: +1
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/161
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user okram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/161#issuecomment-160759843
I ran `mvn clean install` and all passed. This is a trivial fix so I'm just
going to CTR merge it.
```
[INFO]
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032440#comment-15032440
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-978:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/147#discussion_r46202284
--- Diff:
tinkergraph-gremlin/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/tinkergraph/structure/TinkerIoRegistry.java
---
@@ -86,4 +113,145 @@
Github user pietermartin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/161#issuecomment-160753000
@okram Done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pluradj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/147#issuecomment-160751879
Did a clean install, then the Gremlin Server integration tests, then a code
inspection.
VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032404#comment-15032404
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-978:
---
Github user pluradj commented o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032401#comment-15032401
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-978:
---
Github user pluradj commented o
Github user pluradj commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/147#discussion_r46198196
--- Diff:
tinkergraph-gremlin/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/tinkergraph/structure/TinkerIoRegistry.java
---
@@ -86,4 +113,145 @@ pu
I'm only at the point of figuring out if there are enough graph providers
who can implement single label mutability to warrant the discussion of
whether or not we should have it in TinkerPop. Thanks for weighing in from
sqlg perspective.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 2:47 PM, pieter wrote:
> Sqlg doe
Github user okram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/161#issuecomment-160744894
@pietermartin -- sorry to be picky, but can you make it be:
```
g.V(convertToVertexId("marko")).blah().blah()
```
instead of the dire
Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP3-1009:
--
Summary: Add a CAUTION to documentation about HadoopGraph and
getting back elements
Key: TINKERPOP3-1009
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-
Github user pietermartin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/161#issuecomment-160743144
This references TINKERPOP3-1001
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032368#comment-15032368
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-1001:
Github user pietermartin com
GitHub user pietermartin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/161
use the GraphProvider to convert hardcoded ids
The hardcoded integer ids fail on providers that do not have integer ids.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by ru
Sqlg does not support changing a vertex label.
In our case however it could be as trivial as a ALTER TABLE command.
Neo4j supports many labels per node/element which is significantly
different to TinkerPop's label semantic.
Would you propose that also or just editing the one label?
Thanks
Pieter
It occurred to me today while responding to a post regarding Titan that TP
3 APIs assume that vertex labels are immutable. Titan is happy with that
because it doesn't allow such things, but it made me wonder about other
providers.
A quick bit of research showed that Neo4j could support such a thin
For now, my graph provider throws an AssumptionViolatedException for this
test...
So I can skip it.
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 08:16 Marko Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was assuming that the original iterator is "static" with its values and
> thus, if you add values while you iterate, you will only be i
Hi,
I was assuming that the original iterator is "static" with its values and thus,
if you add values while you iterate, you will only be iterating over those
edges you had prior to the iteration.
Unfortunately, it seems the OrientDB has a "dynamic" iterator that can grow
during iteration…
E
Hi Russell,
Over the years, we have really failed on the tutorial front. Fortunately, with
TinkerPop 3.1.0, Stephen released a much needed "Getting Started" tutorial.
http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.0-incubating/tutorials-getting-started.html
Moreover, Stephen and Daniel Kuppitz hav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez updated TINKERPOP3-1007:
---
Summary: Gremlin at the Movies Tutorial (SQL-Style in Gremlin) (was:
Gre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez updated TINKERPOP3-1007:
---
Description:
We need more tutorials. [~spmallette]'s "Getting Started" tu
Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP3-1008:
--
Summary: The Grateful Gremlin Dead Tutorial (Standard Graph
Algorithms in Gremlin)
Key: TINKERPOP3-1008
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1
Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP3-1007:
--
Summary: Gremlin at the Movies Tutorial
Key: TINKERPOP3-1007
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1007
Project: TinkerPop 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032257#comment-15032257
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP3-1007:
--
+1 - would be nice if we
Hi Vasia (everyone),
Does Flink have a graph query language? If not, then with a FlinkGraphComputer
implementation, Flink could ship with Gremlin support.
If you have the time, please read the following blog post as it will help
explain our approach and how Flink could benefit from it:
Github user spmallette commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/159#issuecomment-160720475
merged by CTR as this is pretty simple stuff - just adds a couple
transaction management lines to the tests. thanks.
---
If your project is set up for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP3-1000.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: stephen mallette
> GremlinGroovyScriptEngineO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032237#comment-15032237
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-1000:
Github user spmallette comme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032236#comment-15032236
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-1000:
Github user asfgit closed th
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/159
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
> Using VertexProperyFeatures.FEATURE_{ADD, REMOVE}_PROPERTY perhaps would
be more consistent with the logic used everywhere else...
yeah - i'm +1 for this approach. it makes more sense given ADD/REMOVE
already being the pattern for graph Element instances.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jonath
I think it's either that or change FEATURE_META_PROPERTY to a symmetric
VertexFeatures.FEATURE_{ADD, REMOVE}_METAPROPERTY to pair with
VertexFeatures.FEATURE_{ADD, REMOVE}_PROPERTY.
Using VertexProperyFeatures.FEATURE_{ADD, REMOVE}_PROPERTY perhaps would be
more consistent with the logic used ever
I had long ago built in a model for doing "performance tests" that used:
https://github.com/carrotsearch/junit-benchmarks
I thought we would at some point in the future build those out further but
that hasn't really happened. I'd probably just not worry about them at this
point, but while talking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP3-912.
---
Resolution: Implemented
> Improve the ability to embed Gremlin Server with Channel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15032018#comment-15032018
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-912:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/158
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
I'm fine with that - then you'd have something to link to, though at the
risk of a little more work perhaps making "Installing" isn't bad with
curl/unzip commands. we could have the same for Gremlin Console as i
mentioned earlier.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Dylan Millikin
wrote:
> Durh.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031992#comment-15031992
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-952:
---
Github user twilmes commented o
Github user twilmes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/157#issuecomment-160669178
Sounds good @spmallette. I did the old copy/paste into the shell but I
need to get the full run going. Tried it quickly once and got a hadoop error
so I'
Durh. No for some reason the "Connecting via console" title threw me off.
Maybe we can separate the server installation from the console part with
different titles (content can stay the same)
- run gremlin server
- connection via console
- connection view rest
- etc.
What do you think?
On Mon, N
Github user spmallette commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/157#issuecomment-160658453
bob gave a thumbs up on the JIRA ticket so +1 from me. you're good to
merge @twilmes
btw, your doc changes to the code look sufficiently simpl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031945#comment-15031945
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-952:
---
Github user spmallette commente
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031721#comment-15031721
]
Bob Briody commented on TINKERPOP3-952:
---
No need to wait for me - I already gave
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP3-990.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Mixed types in VertexPropertyTest
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031905#comment-15031905
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-990:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/156
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP3-1003:
-
Affects Version/s: 3.1.0-incubating
> Setting up latest/current links for bin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031882#comment-15031882
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-990:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/156#issuecomment-160652369
VOTE +1 - about to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP3-945.
---
Resolution: Implemented
Fix Version/s: 3.1.1-incubating
> Exceptions should
Well - we do explain how to "start" gremlin server:
http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.0-incubating/#gremlin-server
I guess I'd assumed that folks would know where to download it from and
then how to unpackage it. Similar assumptions were made for the console
section in the reference docs. If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031857#comment-15031857
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-945:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP3-1006:
-
Fix Version/s: 3.1.1-incubating
> Random error during builds:
> shouldReload
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/149
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
ugh - mess. maybe we should just keep the add/remove symmetry and
deprecate FEATURE_META_PROPERTY then.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Jonathan Ellithorpe
wrote:
> 1) Yes, I can submit a PR for fixing the SIMPLE feature requirement set.
> 2) I also agree with deprecating
> VertexPropertyFeat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP3-1002:
-
Assignee: stephen mallette
Affects Version/s: 3.1.0-incubating
Github user spmallette commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/149#issuecomment-160644468
This change doesn't introduce breaks. @velo kept the old method
signatures and provided a couple overloads. providers can choose to use the
new metho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031828#comment-15031828
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-945:
---
Github user spmallette commente
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031818#comment-15031818
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-988:
---
Github user okram commented on
Github user okram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/154#issuecomment-160643374
We will merge this when @dalaro submits the same fix for
`GiraphGraphComputer`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user dkuppitz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/154#issuecomment-160630596
Full test suite passed for me.
VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031783#comment-15031783
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-988:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented
Hey guys,
I've been writing a php tutorial book and I wanted to link to directions on
how to install gremlin-server but realized that there was no such
documentation.
So my first question is.. Should we have this somewhere, and where should
we put it? It's own book?
Second question is, what shoul
Github user spmallette commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/147#issuecomment-160608447
Good idea @PommeVerte - updated the packaged config files to include
`useMapperFromGraph`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031689#comment-15031689
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-978:
---
Github user spmallette commente
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031674#comment-15031674
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-952:
---
Github user PommeVerte commente
Github user PommeVerte commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/157#issuecomment-160604978
This looks simple enough. Lets wait to hear back from @rjbriody but it gets
my VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Dylan Millikin created TINKERPOP3-1006:
--
Summary: Random error during builds:
shouldReloadClassLoaderWhileDoingEvalInSeparateThread()
Key: TINKERPOP3-1006
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3
91 matches
Mail list logo
