Re: Critical poller failure when using tcnative

Jeff Turner wrote: On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 06:56:06PM +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: Jeff Turner wrote: We experienced this before on the old issues.apache.org box, but Remy said he fixed it (and it is fixed on that box): Nothing unusual. Ubuntu 5.10, 1x2.8Ghz Xeon. Java is started with:

Re: Critical poller failure when using tcnative

On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 08:47:22AM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: Jeff Turner wrote: On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 06:56:06PM +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: Jeff Turner wrote: We experienced this before on the old issues.apache.org box, but Remy said he fixed it (and it is fixed on that box):

Re: Critical poller failure when using tcnative

Jeff Turner wrote: You can try the current HEAD for tcnative. It has EINTR loop within the poll call. From Remy's comment I gather 5.5.16's logging reveals as much info as is available: Apr 9, 2006 12:54:10 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AprEndpoint$Poller run SEVERE: Critical poller failure

Re: Critical poller failure when using tcnative

Jeff Turner wrote: The error 3 is actually TCN_EINTR - APR_OS_START_USERERR, so it looks like you actually *did not* patch the AprEndpoint, or didn't copy the .jars. Right - I am running an unpatched 5.5.16 at the moment. When I switch to the patched (I assume - I didn't actually do the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39255] New: - NullPointerException thrown in AuthenticatorBase.register method

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39255. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Challenges for Java hosting

--- Preston L. Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Again, the main question is which target you are trying to hit. Are you aiming at Java web hosting where a hosting service would offer Java to *all* their customers? Are you aiming at Java web hosting for any (or nearly any) existing

svn commit: r392845 - /tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/stylesheets/tomcat-site.xsl

Author: markt Date: Sun Apr 9 14:58:26 2006 New Revision: 392845 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392845view=rev Log: Fix stylesheet. Site wasn't building on a cleanly built machine with Java 5 and ant. Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/stylesheets/tomcat-site.xsl Modified:

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2006/04/09]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Watchdog [2006/04/09]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2006/04/09]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2006/04/09]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

svn commit: r392872 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml

Author: billbarker Date: Sun Apr 9 18:36:19 2006 New Revision: 392872 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392872view=rev Log: Restore the ability to build with the Mail Resources Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml URL:

Gump for TC 6.0

Since the TC 6 build system now looks likes it semi-stable, I've gone ahead and set up the Gump build for the TC 6.0 branch. The first (and, as it happens, nagging run :) should be shortly after 12AM PST (Gump has decided to synchronize on PST, but it is slightly over 5 hours from the

svn commit: r392875 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml

Author: billbarker Date: Sun Apr 9 19:01:18 2006 New Revision: 392875 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392875view=rev Log: Realized that the previous patch was too Gump-centric Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml URL: