Re: [VOTE] Time for 4.1.32?

Mark Thomas wrote: That's 2 +1's and a +0. Any committer care to chip in with another +1 so I can go ahead with the beta release? +1. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

Re: [mod_jk] Documentation

I don't know why a part of my initial message is not visible in this answer, perhaps you cut it... So I recopy the end of my initial message : > > So, I want to understand the code of mod_jk (the connector between > > Apache, wich is he front end, and Tomcat) . I've already generated the > > docum

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39810] - Security flaw in security-constraint when request made by "\"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Time for 4.1.32?

+1 Rainer Mark Thomas wrote: That's 2 +1's and a +0. Any committer care to chip in with another +1 so I can go ahead with the beta release? Cheers, Mark Peter Rossbach wrote: [x ] +1 I am in favour of a 4.1.32-beta release Great job :-) peter ---

Re: [mod_jk] Documentation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> I'm looking for UML diagrams and sequence diagrams. Sorry, they don't exist. >>> About mod_jk.c, my file is quit huge (2757 lines wc -l mod_jk.c) and >>> there is not a lot of comments so I've some issues to understand it, >>> is there others docs? Again. Sorry, but

svn commit: r414590 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom: VERSION src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/interceptors/NonBlockingCoordinator.java

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Jun 15 07:11:29 2006 New Revision: 414590 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414590&view=rev Log: Final bug fixes, coordinator is now working as expected Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/VERSION tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/

Re: [mod_jk] Documentation

As there is no developer documentation: what are you trying to achieve? mod_jk.c is the file that contains the apache specific code. To understand it you will need to have some knowledge of the apache module API. All web server plugins use shared code contained in the directory "common". Rain

Re: [mod_jk] Documentation

Quoting Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > As there is no developer documentation: what are you trying to achieve? > I would like to change dynamically the Round Robin Weighted (RRW), this takeover depends on the application state wich is running on the cluster. Typically I want to cut the cluste

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39309] - tomcat can't compile big jsp, hitting a compiler limit

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39309] - tomcat can't compile big jsp, hitting a compiler limit

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39309] - tomcat can't compile big jsp, hitting a compiler limit

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38863] - [catalina-ant] "Server returned HTTP response code: 401" using InstallTask

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38868] - JDBCRealm defined in META-INF/context.xml not recognized

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Volunteer] - Source code polishing for Tomcat 6.0

Hi: I plan to start working with the Tomcat source again and checked out the sources yesterday. While browsing the sources, I chanced upon a few instances where variable names could be better named - this helps when we're using IDEs and the auto complete picks up method argument names from the pa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39817] New: - Include File Failure for Parent|Top Relative References

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r414654 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader/WebappClassLoader.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: yoavs Date: Thu Jun 15 11:51:57 2006 New Revision: 414654 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414654&view=rev Log: Bugzilla 39657: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39657. Adds the same check for the JSP API that we currently do for the Servlet API, i.e. log a warning an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39657] - No complaints when including jsp-api.jar in a webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r414655 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x: catalina/src/bin/service.bat webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: yoavs Date: Thu Jun 15 11:56:42 2006 New Revision: 414655 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414655&view=rev Log: Bugzilla 39674: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39674 Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/bin/service.bat tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/web

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39674] - service.bat did not check jrockit's jvm.dll

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39689] - Tomcat Server Side Includes (SSI) do not work with single quotes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39704] - context with privileged="true" do not setup properly inner loaders

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r414656 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs: changelog.xml config/loader.xml

Author: yoavs Date: Thu Jun 15 12:09:18 2006 New Revision: 414656 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414656&view=rev Log: Bugzilla 39711: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39711 Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webap

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39711] - WebappLoader checkInterval documentation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39724] - Bug on StandardPipeline.removeValve(Valve valve) for T5.5.16+

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r414658 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11: InternalAprInputBuffer.java LocalStrings.properties

Author: yoavs Date: Thu Jun 15 12:21:24 2006 New Revision: 414658 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414658&view=rev Log: Bugzilla 38088: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38088 Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalAprInputBuff

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38088] - Clarify IOException thrown by InternalAprInputBuffer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38290] - No SESSION_DESTROYED_EVENT sent for existing webapp sessions when webapp is reloaded

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38713] - java.io.IOException: tmpFile.renameTo(classFile) failed when compiling new JSP (upon redeploy)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38897] - Invalid TLDs receive cryptic error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39813] - JMX proxy servlet newline escaping is incorrect

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39724] - Bug on StandardPipeline.removeValve(Valve valve) for T5.5.16+

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39769] - Wrong class loader when the myServlet.destroy() called if myServlet is in the T5 shared directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38897] - Invalid TLDs receive cryptic error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38897] - Invalid TLDs receive cryptic error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [mod_jk] Documentation

On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My problem is not a user problem, for the moment I don't want to use mod_jk, I only want to modify it and thus understand the mod_jk code before. So I think my question might be on the right list, but if I am again wrong I excuse myself and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38897] - Invalid TLDs receive cryptic error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39404] - Tomcat 5.0.28 service fails without error message on Windows2003

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [mod_jk] Documentation

yes, mod_proxy is probably a better choice, since it is HTTP, if you wanna use mod_jk the end point has to support the AJP protocol, I don't know that any other than jserv and tomcat are doing that right now. Filip David Rees wrote: On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39769] - Wrong class loader when the myServlet.destroy() called if myServlet is in the T5 shared directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39769] - Wrong class loader when the myServlet.destroy() called if myServlet is in the T5 shared directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37956] - Make 'set static fields to null' ClassLoader leak workaround behaviour configurable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[RESULT][VOTE] Time for 4.1.32?

Mark Thomas wrote: +1's Mark Thomas Peter Rossbach Bill Barker Filip Hanik Remy Maucherat Rainer Jung +0's Yoav Shapira The release of 4.1.32 beta is therefore approved by the Tomcat PMC. I'll cut it this weekend with the announcement going out once it is on the mirrors. Regards, Mark

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Time for 4.1.32?

I know I've said it before, and I know Roy would wig out - but I'm not wigging out, just trying to educate :) This wasn't a release vote, it was a poll. It's always good to have a poll ("Should we try a beta now?") - you know that nobody has something they needed another few days to work on. Or

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Time for 4.1.32?

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Anytime a committer wants, they are absolutely free to tag the tree and tar the build. But at that moment, it's a 'plain old tarball', it's not a release (even if there was a vote beforehand like this one.) FYI - there's a reason for this. Even if there are compet

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Time for 4.1.32?

Bill, Thanks for clarifying things. I read through http://www.apache.org/dev/#releases but didn't find anything as definitive and clear as your summary. I'll happily follow the process you outlined for 4.1.32 To clarify the position on the beta status, the Tomcat project has historically (at leas

svn commit: r414713 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt

Author: markt Date: Thu Jun 15 17:46:29 2006 New Revision: 414713 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414713&view=rev Log: Add changes to 15 June 2006. Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt URL:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39821] New: - JK busy number is abnormal

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39821] - JK busy number is abnormal

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r414715 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/bin/service.bat

Author: markt Date: Thu Jun 15 18:19:36 2006 New Revision: 414715 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414715&view=rev Log: Add service.bat based on TC5 version Added: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/src/bin/service.bat (with props) Added: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/cat

svn commit: r414717 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/build.xml

Author: markt Date: Thu Jun 15 18:55:49 2006 New Revision: 414717 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414717&view=rev Log: Tweak the 4.x build to remove a 1.4 JDK dependency Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/build.xml Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/catalina/

Re: [mod_jk] Documentation (offtopic)

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: yes, mod_proxy is probably a better choice, since it is HTTP, if you wanna use mod_jk the end point has to support the AJP protocol, I don't know that any other than jserv and tomcat are doing that right now. Actually I think you'll find it's in a little wider use

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Time for 4.1.32?

Mark Thomas wrote: To clarify the position on the beta status, the Tomcat project has historically (at least as long as I have been involved anyway) released initially as Alpha/Beta as deemed appropriate, given people a few weeks to test and then had a stability vote. I intend to follow the same

svn commit: r414725 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/tomcat.nsi

Author: markt Date: Thu Jun 15 19:34:03 2006 New Revision: 414725 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414725&view=rev Log: Fix error in windows installer preventing correct config of temp dir Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/tomcat.nsi Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x

svn commit: r414727 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.xml

Author: markt Date: Thu Jun 15 19:50:39 2006 New Revision: 414727 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414727&view=rev Log: readme.txt refers to building.txt so include it in the release Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.xml Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.