Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta

hi, I am not a tomcat expert. I got the apache-tomcat-4.1.32-src.tar.gz from the link u have given. It seems to be build.xml and build.properties files are missing in the root folder amila.

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta

+1 Keith On 6/18/06, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, Following Bill's advice I am re-running this vote based on a tarball. Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta.

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta

+1 Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta. To kick things off, here is my +1 Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [E

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38713] - java.io.IOException: tmpFile.renameTo(classFile) failed when compiling new JSP (upon redeploy)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39817] - Include File Failure for Parent|Top Relative References

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39824] - Tomcat 5.5.16+ memory realm on context not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug report for Watchdog [2006/06/18]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2006/06/18]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2006/06/18]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2006/06/18]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta

Mark Thomas wrote: > Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta. To kick things off, here is my +1 Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[VOTE] Release Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta

All, Following Bill's advice I am re-running this vote based on a tarball. Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta. Download from: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/ MD5s: apache-tomcat-4.1.32-src.tar.gz 6d02184d961954a6670db2d0c1e9c39e apache-tomcat-4.1.32-src.zip 467ea0d5ee

Re: rfc2109 and TC cookies

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Hi, I have been reading rfc2109 it gives an examples of cooky like (as the spec's states): +++ Cookie: $Version="1"; Part_Number="Rocket_Launcher_0001"; $Path="/acme" +++ not sure where that syntax comes from, from what I read it l

Re: Tomcat Comet Model, DOS example

Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Right now I'm not hot about reading the data first in the container: if done, it should be in InputBuffer, yes, that is how I suggested it to be done. The AprBuffer was reading the socket data in my checkin. but could mean automagically di

Re: Tomcat Comet Model, DOS example

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Right now I'm not hot about reading the data first in the container: if done, it should be in InputBuffer, yes, that is how I suggested it to be done. The AprBuffer was reading the socket data in my checkin. but could mean automagically discarding data, which co

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39404] - Tomcat 5.0.28 service fails without error message on Windows2003

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39824] - Tomcat 5.5.16+ memory realm on context not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

tomcat6: Make Unified EL implementation pluggable

Wouldn't it be nice to configure which EL implementation should be used? This could be done by simply specifying the subclass of javax.el.ExpressionFactory to be used. This would make it easy to use a standalone implementation like http://juel.sourceforge.net. ---