Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy...
I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page.
Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's for 'alpha'?
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha is now available for
+1
2006/11/17, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy...
I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page.
Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's for 'alpha'?
Remy
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
+1 -- 6.0.2 is beta,
Am 17.11.2006 um 10:46 schrieb William A. Rowe, Jr.:
Guys - something got broken again in your release process against
ASF policy...
I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your
downloads page.
Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy...
I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page.
Nothing got broken.
Tomcat is probably one of the latest remaining projects
where the developers and PMC
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40993.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I am new to this list, so let me quickly introduce myself: I am Felix
Meschberger and am working on a Web Content Management Application
running on a Java Content Repository (Apache Jackrabbit) provding
amongst other things dynamic compilation of JSP scripts. I am also a
committer to the
Hello Jean-Frederic,
there is a problem with the instdso.sh you checked in. It removes a
couple of files at the end, including the mod_jk.la file. When we run
make install afterwards, apxs again tries to run instdso.sh from it's
apache installation and complains about the missing mod_jk.la.
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
I am new to this list, so let me quickly introduce myself: I am Felix
Meschberger and am working on a Web Content Management Application
running on a Java Content Repository (Apache Jackrabbit) provding
amongst other things dynamic compilation of JSP scripts. I am
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39589.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
6.0.2 is:
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
I like it :)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF
policy...
I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your
downloads page.
Nothing got broken.
Actually it did, because I've followed the list for some 3
Yoav Shapira wrote:
What did we miss? Was it a formal announcement to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about 6.0.1 stability? Was it formally marking the 6.0.1 time/date
poll as a voting thread and posting its results?
What you are missing is pretty straightforward. It's that you can't have
a release
16 matches
Mail list logo