DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40719.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I'll tag the 1.1.8 later today and put the distro files in regular
places, so they can be used for Tomcat builds.
BTW, can we again consider to use the minimum version required
to that version (1.1.8).
Although the API is compatible with 1.1.3 version, the all versions
between 1.1.3 and
Hi to all,
There are some problems with tcnative and I see today some fixes in
Tomcat and tcnative.
Should we expect a release of Tomcat 6 and tcnative in the next days ?
Regards
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
2006/12/11, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'll tag the 1.1.8 later today and put the distro files in regular
places, so they can be used for Tomcat builds.
BTW, can we again consider to use the minimum version required
to that version (1.1.8).
Although the API is compatible with 1.1.3
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
There are some problems with tcnative and I see today some fixes in
Tomcat and tcnative.
Should we expect a release of Tomcat 6 and tcnative in the next days ?
I understand you have a problem. However, can you try to stop flooding
when that happens ?
Rémy
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I'll tag the 1.1.8 later today and put the distro files in regular
places, so they can be used for Tomcat builds.
BTW, can we again consider to use the minimum version required
to that version (1.1.8).
Although the API is compatible with 1.1.3 version, the all versions
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
My little tweak will most likely be ported back to 5.5.x. As a result,
when you install a new build, you'll get a warning, and the code will
not use the problematic method by default. As a result, the forced
upgrade is a waste of time for most.
Just an note:
We're also having odd problems with tcnative -- but on 5.5.20...
All problems disappear without tcnative enabled, but performance suffers...
--
Jess Holle
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
There are some problems with tcnative and I see today some fixes in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40719.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Dec 11, 2006, at 5:00 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I'll tag the 1.1.8 later today and put the distro files in regular
places, so they can be used for Tomcat builds.
BTW, can we again consider to use the minimum version required
to that version (1.1.8).
Although the API is compatible with
Author: pero
Date: Mon Dec 11 10:30:02 2006
New Revision: 485795
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=485795
Log:
Add a packetSize option to standard ajp jk handler
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified:
Hi,
Mladen Turk provided Windows Binaries for win32 (Apache mod_jk, IIS
isapi plugin and Netscape nsapi plugin) and for win64 (AMD+IA64 isapi
plugin):
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries
Thanks Mladen and happy testing to everybody.
Regards,
Rainer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37084.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: markt
Date: Mon Dec 11 19:45:59 2006
New Revision: 486005
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=486005
Log:
Fix bug 40551. When restoring a session from a PersistentManager to w new node
update the session Id with the new jvmRoute. Based on a patch by Chris Chandler.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40551.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41152.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41153.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
17 matches
Mail list logo