Author: mturk
Date: Wed Jan 31 00:27:06 2007
New Revision: 501763
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=501763
Log:
JNI_VERSION_1_6 if defined is missing the JDK1_1InitArgs.
Make sure it at least compiles by ifdefing the code.
Modified:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Jan 31 00:30:50 2007
New Revision: 501764
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=501764
Log:
Add empty worker factory for jni worker in case Java6 is detected.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_jni_worker.c
Modified:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Jan 31 00:36:57 2007
New Revision: 501766
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=501766
Log:
Backport filter notification from JK2 where we had an
option to specify the auth_complete. Fixes Bz #36365.
The patch does not like proposed detect IIS 5.1 but rather
adds
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36365.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Jan 31 00:56:12 2007
New Revision: 501770
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=501770
Log:
Small fix. Detect auth notification inside initialize_extension and after the
config is read
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Jan 31 00:57:38 2007
New Revision: 501771
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=501771
Log:
Oops. Working on multiple SVN repositories can lead to a real mess :)
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41504.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41506.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Few days ago I changed my email address for Tomcat Users List
with standard unsubscribe/subscribe, and although I can receive
messages, send messages, I cannot see the messages send by me.
(mladen_dot_turk_at_gmail_dot_com)
It looks others can see the messages I sent.
They are even listed
Hello,
I would like to know what are the changing to do in the configuration
files (and which files are they ?) of the TOMCAT APACHE 5.5.9 to make
it enable to multi-application work,
so more than one application can use the same instance of the APACHE.
In advance, thank you.
Best regards
Hi,
I've had something similar happen with GMail on several occassions.
It tries to be smart and see if sender address = your address, and in
that case not show duplicates in your inbox.
To test, try sending a message to the list from another address, e.g.
your apache.org one, or another mail
Guershon Marc wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know what are the changing to do in the configuration
files (and which files are they ?) of the TOMCAT APACHE 5.5.9 to make
it enable to multi-application work,
so more than one application can use the same instance of the APACHE.
This is a
Marc,
This question is better targeted at our users list,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please post followup messages, if any,
there.
In short, the answer is nothing: Tomcat will run multiple webapps out
of the box. Just drop different WAR files in the webapps directory,
and off you go. A good document
Thanks Mark and Yoav!
As I suspected, it is a 'trivial feature' of gmail :)
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41509.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40719.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38713.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi to all,
I built and installed the jk 1.2.20 on iSeries i5/OS V5R3 Apache 2
server to replace the previous 1.2.19.
And it core with this stack trace :
User Trace Dump for job 421305/QTMHHTTP/APACHEDFT. Size: 300K,
Wrapped 1 times.
--- 01/27/2007 23:52:06 ---
00E7:485816 Stack:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41502.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I built and installed the jk 1.2.20 on iSeries i5/OS V5R3 Apache 2
server to replace the previous 1.2.19.
Think there was some problem with wrong printf format.
Rainer fixed that post 1.2.20, but he should know better.
Regards,
Mladen.
Thanks.
Did the 1.2.21 is expected soon or should I use the trunk ?
2007/1/31, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I built and installed the jk 1.2.20 on iSeries i5/OS V5R3 Apache 2
server to replace the previous 1.2.19.
Think there was some problem with wrong
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
IMHO, it is due, last version was september 30th...!
thanks for your opinion :)
we'll get the ball rolling. I have a move pending, we are going from
Texas to Colorado, so I'll try to squeeze this in there as well
Filip
You've picked a bad year. We've had
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41512.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Henri,
there have been two bug fixes concerning string formatting, which have
core dump potential. Both only occur with log level info or above. I
think they are *not* the reason (see below). The code is in
common/jk_ajp_common.c:
1) Wrong order of arguments; should only be relevant, if
George Sexton wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
IMHO, it is due, last version was september 30th...!
thanks for your opinion :)
we'll get the ball rolling. I have a move pending, we are going from
Texas to Colorado, so I'll try to squeeze this in there as well
Filip
You've picked a
Sorry to jump in, I'm new here. I started watching this list because of
a problem I'm having with the mod_jk 1.2.20 as well. I'm not getting
core files, but I do have problems that I can't reproduce at log level
trace or debug.
I'm running it on AIX 5.3 (ml05). I compiled the apache 2.2.4
2007/1/31, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Henri,
there have been two bug fixes concerning string formatting, which have
core dump potential. Both only occur with log level info or above. I
think they are *not* the reason (see below). The code is in
common/jk_ajp_common.c:
1) Wrong order of
Hi Eric,
maybe your observation is in fact related to Henri's, since you also get
core dumps (segmentation faults), which is quite unusual. See further
comments inline.
Eric Wertman wrote:
Sorry to jump in, I'm new here. I started watching this list because of
a problem I'm having with the
Author: remm
Date: Wed Jan 31 15:31:39 2007
New Revision: 502042
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=502042
Log:
- No functional change: deferred is always true when elExpression is true.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Validator.java
Modified:
Author: remm
Date: Wed Jan 31 15:45:03 2007
New Revision: 502046
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=502046
Log:
- Changelog update.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/ROOT/index.html
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified:
Connector:
Connector port=8010 protocol=AJP/1.3 enableLookups=false
maxThreads=800 minThreads=100 bufferSize=8192 backlog=256 /
I've tried all sorts of permutations of this... None of the values make
much difference. My ab test is -n 1000 -c 200.
---
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41502.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I know we've talked about this before and resolved Bugzilla items
related to this, but I'd like to be reminded, please. Why does the
following code exist as such?
In org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41507.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41504.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41506.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41504.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41504.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: remm
Date: Wed Jan 31 16:39:00 2007
New Revision: 502060
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=502060
Log:
- As discussed, 6.0.9 tag.
Added:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_9/
- copied from r502059, tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hmm, that's how I thought it worked, the filename would only be used if
the path attribute was not present inside the XML file.
Filip
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
I know we've talked about this before and resolved Bugzilla items
related to this, but I'd like to be reminded, please. Why does the
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 31 16:59:17 2007
New Revision: 502062
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=502062
Log:
Fix build. I believe I implemented the intended behaviour. Rainer - can you
confirm?
Modified:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
This code results in the (correctly documented at
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/context.html, but
annoying) behavior that users deploying web applications from
conf/Catalina/localhost/appname.xml context files can't set a path for
their context. Instead, the
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 31 17:30:32 2007
New Revision: 502067
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=502067
Log:
Fix bug 41512. Replace @version@ token in release notes.
Modified:
tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/build.xml
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41512.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41513.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Eric Wertman wrote:
Connector:
IfModule jk_module
JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties
JkShmFile logs/mod_jk.shm
JkShmSize 8192
This is 8MB of shared memory.
Are you sure you have 1 workers?
JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log
JkLogLeveldebug
/IfModule
Segmentation fault in
Yes, thanks mark. I didn't build it, because I told Peter about the
changes and he needs to do some cleanup for the jkstatus ant taks any ways.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jan 31 16:59:17 2007
New Revision: 502062
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=502062
Log:
50 matches
Mail list logo
