Re: Tagging 5.5.24

On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 19:14 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Sorry about the hassle, looks like some printStacktrace statements made > their way into 5.5.23, creating an ugly and confusing startup. > > I will retag 5.5.24, Monday March 5th, 2007 at 12.00pm Mountain time. > The build will

Re: Tagging 5.5.24

On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 09:55 -0500, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 19:14 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > > Sorry about the hassle, looks like some printStacktrace statements made > > their way into 5.5.23, creating an ugly and confusing startup. > > > > I will retag

Re: Tagging 5.5.24

William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 09:55 -0500, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 19:14 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Sorry about the hassle, looks like some printStacktrace statements made their way into 5.5.23, creating an ugly and confusing startup.

Re: Tagging 5.5.24

On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 16:00 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > > After re-reading I believe it's talking about mod_jk sources shipped in > > 5.5.20? Is that correct? > > Yes. I don't think your users are building mod_jk from these sources. Correct, so we are ok. Just need to get 1.2.21 stabilized

New 5.5.23 binaries -> Re: Tagging 5.5.24

Looks like the tag is good, it was a anomaly on my local box. I will recheck refresh my build box with the tag and update the binaries with new 5.5.23 binaries Filip Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Sorry about the hassle, looks like some printStacktrace statements made their way into 5.5.23, c

Re: New 5.5.23 binaries -> Re: Tagging 5.5.24

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Looks like the tag is good, it was a anomaly on my local box. I will recheck refresh my build box with the tag and update the binaries with new 5.5.23 binaries +1. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Tagging 5.5.24

new binary/source packages on their way Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 09:55 -0500, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 19:14 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Sorry about the hassle, looks like some printStacktrace statemen

Re: Debugging Apache/mod_jk (worker) fault on AIX

Hi Rainer... I'll have to re-compile to get this info for you. I'll make sure I can re-produce it and submit the details in a bugzilla. I think the first thing you'll notice, though, is that I'm using the IBM cc_r compiler and not gcc. Rainer Jung wrote: Eric reported very strange mod_jk b

[VOTE] Release build 5.5.23 - Take 2

Due to a recent screw up, my binaries didn't match the tag in SVN. This has been corrected. A new build has been run from the tag, the TCK tests have all been run and passed. Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.23-2/ According to the (

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.23 - Take 2

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Due to a recent screw up, my binaries didn't match the tag in SVN. This has been corrected. A new build has been run from the tag, the TCK tests have all been run and passed. Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.23 - Take 2

Hi, On 3/5/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.23-2/ According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 5.5.23 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ X ] Stable Looking goo

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.23 - Take 2

According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 5.5.23 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41766] New: - apache-tomcat-5.5.20-src.tar.gz includes broken class files

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41766] - apache-tomcat-5.5.20-src.tar.gz includes broken class files

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Debugging Apache/mod_jk (worker) fault on AIX

Hi Eric, we won't close the issue immediately with "we don't support cc_r". This will be our last option :) Rainer Eric Wertman wrote: Hi Rainer... I'll have to re-compile to get this info for you. I'll make sure I can re-produce it and submit the details in a bugzilla. I think the first

Re: Debugging Apache/mod_jk (worker) fault on AIX

Any reason you didn't choose xlc_r? I'd suggest you retest with that compile. Rainer Jung wrote: > Hi Eric, > > we won't close the issue immediately with "we don't support cc_r". This > will be our last option :) > > Rainer > > Eric Wertman wrote: >> Hi Rainer... I'll have to re-compile to get

Re: Debugging Apache/mod_jk (worker) fault on AIX

Actually I started with xlc_r and it wouldn't go. Not mod_jk specifically, but apr or apache 2.2.4. I stuck with cc_r for consistency. William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Any reason you didn't choose xlc_r? I'd suggest you retest with that compile. Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Eric, we won't close the i

Why JkCoyoteHandler instead of AjpProtocol?

Hi, in org/apache/catalina/connector/Connector.java, the default classname for the AJP-protocol is "org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler" instead of org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpProtocol. My personal problem is, that i'd like to have flush-packets. org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler does not use th

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.23 - Take 2

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Due to a recent screw up, my binaries didn't match the tag in SVN. This > has been corrected. > A new build has been run from the tag, the TCK tests have all been run > and passed. > > Candidate binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.23 - Take 2

Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Tag is stable but the source distro has a few things that it shouldn't as reported in http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41766 - apache-tomcat-5.5.23-src/connectors/jk/jkstatus/build/* - apache-tomcat-5.5.23-src/connectors/jk/j

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.23 - Take 2

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: >> Tag is stable but the source distro has a few things that it shouldn't >> as reported in http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41766 >> >> - apache-tomcat-5.5.23-src/connectors/jk/jkstatus/build/*

svn commit: r514965 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt

Author: markt Date: Mon Mar 5 19:04:01 2007 New Revision: 514965 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514965 Log: Update change log prior to 4.1.35 release Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4

svn commit: r514966 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default

Author: markt Date: Mon Mar 5 19:14:38 2007 New Revision: 514966 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514966 Log: Update version number in preparation for tagging 4.1.35 Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.

svn commit: r514967 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.xml

Author: markt Date: Mon Mar 5 19:18:56 2007 New Revision: 514967 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514967 Log: Update year Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.xml Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/conta

svn commit: r514969 - in /tomcat/servletapi/branches/servlet2.3-jsp1.2-tc4.x/src/share/javax/servlet: ./ http/ jsp/ jsp/tagext/

Author: markt Date: Mon Mar 5 19:28:20 2007 New Revision: 514969 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514969 Log: Clean up unused imports. Modified: tomcat/servletapi/branches/servlet2.3-jsp1.2-tc4.x/src/share/javax/servlet/FilterConfig.java tomcat/servletapi/branches/servlet

svn commit: r514970 - /tomcat/servletapi/branches/servlet2.3-jsp1.2-tc4.x/src/share/javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet.java

Author: markt Date: Mon Mar 5 19:29:05 2007 New Revision: 514970 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514970 Log: Fix obvious bug in error message. Modified: tomcat/servletapi/branches/servlet2.3-jsp1.2-tc4.x/src/share/javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet.java Modified: tomcat/servlet

svn commit: r514972 - in /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x: build.properties.default build.xml

Author: markt Date: Mon Mar 5 19:46:38 2007 New Revision: 514972 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514972 Log: Fix minor glitches in build script Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.xml Modified: tomca

svn commit: r514975 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default

Author: markt Date: Mon Mar 5 20:08:53 2007 New Revision: 514975 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514975 Log: Add a building hint for PureTLS Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.default Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.properties.defau

svn commit: r514976 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt

Author: markt Date: Mon Mar 5 20:11:14 2007 New Revision: 514976 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514976 Log: Add note for new PureTLS version Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Modified: tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt UR

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41655] - Some variable informations are not output in some languages.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41655] - Some variable informations are not output in some languages.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41655] - Some variable informations are not output in some languages.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu