OK, I forgot, that I actually had a user and group named asf (I thought
tar would ignore their non-existance).
But I agree with William, that we should instead use a general purpose
user and group exactly because of the reasons given by him.
If a non-root user extracts the tarball, his
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Apr 3 00:36:45 2007
New Revision: 525070
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=525070
Log:
Use root/users for a user/group when creating tar.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/tools/jkrelease.sh
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/tools/jkrelease.sh
URL:
Rainer Jung wrote:
OK, I forgot, that I actually had a user and group named asf (I thought
tar would ignore their non-existance).
All in all I would suggest root:bin to.
I used root:users instead.
Think the users group exists on all *nixes.
Regards,
Mladen.
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Apr 3 00:41:22 2007
New Revision: 525072
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=525072
Log:
Oops. Looks there is no users group on Solaris, using bin instead.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/tools/jkrelease.sh
Modified:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
OK, I forgot, that I actually had a user and group named asf (I
thought tar would ignore their non-existance).
All in all I would suggest root:bin to.
I used root:users instead.
Think the users group exists on all *nixes.
So does bin. users has a
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Apr 3 03:45:51 2007
New Revision: 525132
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=525132
Log:
Fix #41973 by not initializing IPV6 if address is null.
APR cannot listen both on IPV4 and IPV6 on some platforms
(e.g BSD and Windows).
Modified:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Apr 3 03:47:06 2007
New Revision: 525133
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=525133
Log:
Fix #41973 by not initializing IPV6 if address is null.
APR cannot listen both on IPV4 and IPV6 on some platforms
(e.g BSD and Windows).
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41973.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mark Thomas wrote:
Tomcat 4.1.36 is:
[X] Stable
[ ] Beta
[ ] Alpha
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Few months ago Filip added something like
Listener className=org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener
SSLEngine=someengine/on/off /
Now, that simply doeasn't work because SSL.initialize(null) is always called,
and my perception was that this would allow having
Author: remm
Date: Tue Apr 3 07:13:33 2007
New Revision: 525160
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=525160
Log:
- It should be possible for the event object to be closed asynchronously. In
that case, I think an END event
should be sent to cleanup the pipeline.
Modified:
Author: remm
Date: Tue Apr 3 07:14:30 2007
New Revision: 525161
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=525161
Log:
- Merge from javadoc.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml
URL:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Apr 3 07:16:23 2007
New Revision: 525163
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=525163
Log:
Parse the random file name as mod_ssl does.
Use egd only if prefixed with egd:
(eg, egd:/var/run/egd-pool)
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/ssl.c
That should be pretty straight forward, no mbean or anything needed.
I'll take a look at it tonight
Filip
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Few months ago Filip added something like
Listener className=org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener
SSLEngine=someengine/on/off /
Now, that simply
Author: pero
Date: Tue Apr 3 09:27:21 2007
New Revision: 525200
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=525200
Log:
fixed typo...
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml
URL:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
That should be pretty straight forward, no mbean or anything needed.
I'll take a look at it tonight
Cool, otherwise if we have a native compiled without SSL,
it throws exception instead not initializing SSL at all.
Regards,
Mladen.
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Apr 3 09:42:27 2007
New Revision: 525206
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=525206
Log:
Increment the current trunk version after 1.1.10 tag.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/jnirelease.sh
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/include/tcn_version.h
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42037.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42037.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42037.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42037.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42038.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: remm
Date: Tue Apr 3 14:55:06 2007
New Revision: 525296
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=525296
Log:
- Changelog update.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
Following Remy's suggestion I implemented web.xml overrides of
annotations but although the result compiles I have no very good way
to determine if it works. I looked around a bit but didn't see any
unit tests or integration testsuite. What am I missing? Right now I
can really only test
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42039.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42039.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
On 4/3/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following Remy's suggestion I implemented web.xml overrides of
annotations but although the result compiles I have no very good way
to determine if it works. I looked around a bit but didn't see any
unit tests or integration testsuite. What
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42041.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42041.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42041.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
30 matches
Mail list logo