Hi All,
As admin webapp is not supported in tomcat 6.0.x, i have taken admin
webapp of tomcat 5.5.23 and modified according to tomcat 6.0.7 code. Now my
admin webapp is up and running in tomcat 6.0.7. Following operations are
working in admin webapp,
1. Logging in
2. Updation to Tomcat
David Blevins wrote:
My personal opinion: java.util.logging very much lacks a good
formatter. The default 2 line formatting of messages, splitting
timestamps and message in separate lines, is not really useful in
production. Many ad hoc log analysis practices work on a line oriented
basis.
Rainer Jung wrote:
That's why it would be nice if someone took the burden of writing a
better log formatter for j.u.l.
What should it look like ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Hi Remy,
if we only want to give an alternative for the SimpleFormatter:
that one is not configurable, so it's capabilities are printing out a
localized timestamp, after that the class and method, a localized level
string, and last the log message. All of those are basically given by
the log
Forget the previous post, it contained garbage at the end
Hi Remy,
if we only want to give an alternative for the SimpleFormatter:
that one is not configurable, so it's capabilities are printing out a
localized timestamp, after that the class and method, a localized level
string, and last
Author: pero
Date: Wed Aug 1 06:59:00 2007
New Revision: 561799
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=561799
Log:
Ported from tomcat 6.0.x: Fix timeout setting on a replicated session.
Modified:
David Blevins wrote:
So another topic,
There's a thread going on in OpenEJB at the moment about possibly
switching away from log4j for the reason that the logging config gets
easily messed up in embedded environments (maven, specificaly) and of
course to have one less dependency -- the 3.0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43009.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42720.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1
Am 31.07.2007 um 00:48 schrieb Remy Maucherat:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.14/
According to the release process, the 6.0.14 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ x] Stable
Rémy
Author: pero
Date: Wed Aug 1 07:09:41 2007
New Revision: 561803
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=561803
Log:
Don't send a message if no cluster member exists.
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/session/DeltaManager.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43009.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42996.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I absolutely despise how that is built. It makes building that jar a
complete NIGHTMARE. Presently we do not offer than jar on Gentoo and I
have no plans to. Or worse potential ways to.
Before I mention how we solved this problem for JPackage let me say
that I agree with William that this sort
On Aug 1, 2007, at 1:30 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
My personal opinion: java.util.logging very much lacks a good
formatter. The default 2 line formatting of messages, splitting
timestamps and message in separate lines, is not really useful in
production. Many ad hoc log
That's why it would be nice if someone took the burden of writing a
better log formatter for j.u.l.
Got it. Yea, that format is certainly grep unfriendly.
Looks like Harmony has a formatter we could copy from and fix to not add
the new line.
Jason,
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 14:01 -0400, Jason Corley wrote:
It took us quite a while in JPackage to come up with something that
did not require the tomcat SRPM to be distributed with three
additional projects sources or to heavily patch tomcat itself.
Eventually we settled on a custom ant
Author: markt
Date: Wed Aug 1 20:16:38 2007
New Revision: 562006
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=562006
Log:
Add info on CVE-2007-3384
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-3.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-3.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-3.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CVE-2007-3384: XSS in Tomcat cookies example
Severity:
Low (Cross-site scripting)
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
3.3 to 3.3.2
Description:
When reporting error messages, Tomcat does not filter user supplied
data before
25 matches
Mail list logo