svn commit: r572498 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java

Author: billbarker Date: Mon Sep 3 19:45:37 2007 New Revision: 572498 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572498&view=rev Log: Forward porting Reader fixes from 5.5.x Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/or

svn commit: r572497 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/B2CConverter.java

Author: billbarker Date: Mon Sep 3 19:44:07 2007 New Revision: 572497 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572497&view=rev Log: Forward porting Reader fixes from 5.5.x Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/B2CConverter.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/a

svn commit: r572490 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/SSLSupport.java

Author: billbarker Date: Mon Sep 3 18:54:52 2007 New Revision: 572490 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572490&view=rev Log: Update cipher key list with Sun's new ones in Java 6 Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/SSLSupport.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk

svn commit: r572487 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/SSLSupport.java

Author: billbarker Date: Mon Sep 3 18:39:25 2007 New Revision: 572487 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572487&view=rev Log: Update cipher key list with Sun's new ones in Java 6 Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/SSLSupport.java Modified: tomcat/conn

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30949] - After Failed Include, Request and Response not Unwrapped

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29936] - XML parser loading problems by container

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Connectors cleanup

On Sep 3, 2007, at 2:06 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Hi, Following on from my previous over eager attempt to clean up the duplicate code in connectors I would like to propose the following - remove connectors/trunk/ajp/CHANGES - remove connectors/trunk/ajp/proxy - move connectors/

svn commit: r572355 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c

Author: jim Date: Mon Sep 3 07:40:44 2007 New Revision: 572355 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572355&view=rev Log: making looping explicit code-wise. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c

Re: Connectors cleanup

Mladen Turk wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> Mladen Turk wrote: >>> I propose we create connectors/sanbox and move the >>> trunk/ajp/* code in there. >>> ajp/proxy code can be removed of course. >> >> Could we just move it to tomcat/sandbox as that already exists? >> > > We need connectors/sandbox a

Re: Connectors cleanup

Mark Thomas wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: I propose we create connectors/sanbox and move the trunk/ajp/* code in there. ajp/proxy code can be removed of course. Could we just move it to tomcat/sandbox as that already exists? We need connectors/sandbox anyway, so IMHO it's a good initial reason.

Re: Connectors cleanup

Mladen Turk wrote: > I propose we create connectors/sanbox and move the > trunk/ajp/* code in there. > ajp/proxy code can be removed of course. Could we just move it to tomcat/sandbox as that already exists? Mark - To unsubscrib

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.25

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 5.5.25 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Draft for September 2007 Board report

Hey, On 9/3/07, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We need to file the board report by next week for a board > meeting on September 19th. > > Here is my draft, so please fill in the gaps, since it's my > first one :) Looks good to me ;) Yoav

Re: [VOTE] Move trunk to sandbox

Yes, its clear and vote to move tomcat/trunk to a sandbox branch! Peter Am 03.09.2007 um 11:53 schrieb Remy Maucherat: Peter Rossbach wrote: +1 move 6.0 trunk at a sandbox. We must made a check that we not lose some non comet changes :-( This vote is about trunk (/tomcat/trunk), not the

Re: [VOTE] Move trunk to sandbox

Peter Rossbach wrote: +1 move 6.0 trunk at a sandbox. We must made a check that we not lose some non comet changes :-( This vote is about trunk (/tomcat/trunk), not the 6.0.x trunk (/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk). 6.0.x trunk is from where 6.0.x tags are created, so it's really the 6.0.x branch. As

Re: svn commit: r572181 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common: jk_ajp12_worker.c jk_ajp_common.c jk_jni_worker.c jk_status.c

Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Mladen, I'm fine with rolling back and committing in steps. No need to do that. Let's just take more care in the future. It'll be much easier to follow the commits thought. Regards, Mladen - To unsubscr