Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
I don't know if this is intended behavior, or a bug in mod_jk, or even a
bug in Apache, but something seems amiss. Thoughts?
Your patch won't work.
The real problem is in the initialization for vhosts where
when there is *any* Jk directive the create_jk_config is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43647.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:44 AM, Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
I can't seem to find the repository location anywhere on the
connectors page either...
Ah, found it on the Tomcat pages.
--
Ian Ward Comfort [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Administrator, Student Computing, Stanford University
On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:32 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
I don't know if this is intended behavior, or a bug in mod_jk, or
even a bug in Apache, but something seems amiss. Thoughts?
Your patch won't work.
No, not for this larger issue.
The real problem is in the
On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:18 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
I don't know if this is intended behavior, or a bug in mod_jk, or
even a bug in Apache, but something seems amiss. Thoughts?
Right, this is bug indeed.
If there is no Jk... directives the vhost conf is wrongly
Mladen Turk schrieb:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
be careful:
OK :)
I also added an option JkMountCopyAll,
OK, but clone is called when there is no JkMountCopy All defined
if (sconf sconf-was_initialized == JK_TRUE jk_mount_copy_all ==
JK_FALSE) {
clone_jk_config
So if there is
Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
clone_jk_config is bogus, and doesn't behave like it should
(copy only the basic data and no mounts)
Was this function introduced since 1.2.25?
Yes, I was talking about trunk not 1.2.25
Regards,
Mladen
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43647.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41939.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
You can indeed use session replication without sticky sessions, and
the session data will be copied to all the Tomcat servers. However it
may be inefficient. You probably have to use synchronous replication
to ensure the session data is consistent across the cluster, which
adds latency to the
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Nov 2 16:09:52 2007
New Revision: 591507
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=591507view=rev
Log:
Add utility function to mod_jk.c for merging
two tables.
Copy an entry from src to dst, if there is no
entry for the same key in dst.
Modified:
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Nov 2 16:19:11 2007
New Revision: 591510
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=591510view=rev
Log:
Fix configuration initialization behaviour for virtual hosts,
which contain no JK directive.
HTTPD does not call create_jk_config or merge_jk_config for those hosts.
It
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Nov 2 16:26:28 2007
New Revision: 591512
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=591512view=rev
Log:
Apache: Allow JkMount and JkUnMount patterns to start with '*' and '?' in
addition to '/'.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Nov 2 16:36:49 2007
New Revision: 591514
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=591514view=rev
Log:
Fix porting error from httpd 2.0/2.2 module to 1.3 module.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c
Modified:
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Nov 2 17:38:35 2007
New Revision: 591524
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=591524view=rev
Log:
We created a new server config structure, but we didn't use it :(
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42003.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
It is not only ineffizient and a risk, Read 7.7.2 at the spec:
SRV.7.7.2 Distributed Environments
Within an application marked as distributable, all requests that are
part of a session
must be handled by one Java Virtual Machine1 (“JVM”) at a time. The
container
must be able to handle
17 matches
Mail list logo
