New Tomcat release? Out of the box bundle with Harmony?

2007-11-08 Thread Alexey Petrenko
Hey. I'm working on Apache Harmony [1] which is J2SE implementation. I want to suggest you to create Tomcat out of the box bundle on top of Harmony. I've created such a bundle with the previous Harmony milestone release [2]. It works but has areas for improvements... For example it's possible to

svn commit: r593171 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-11-08 Thread jfclere
Author: jfclere Date: Thu Nov 8 06:38:54 2007 New Revision: 593171 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593171view=rev Log: Cast my vote. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL:

Re: New Tomcat release? Out of the box bundle with Harmony?

2007-11-08 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hey, On Nov 8, 2007 9:10 AM, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to suggest you to create Tomcat out of the box bundle on top of Harmony. I've created such a bundle with the previous Harmony milestone release [2]. It works but has areas for improvements... For example it's

Re: New Tomcat release? Out of the box bundle with Harmony?

2007-11-08 Thread Costin Manolache
On Nov 8, 2007 6:15 AM, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, On Nov 8, 2007 9:10 AM, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to suggest you to create Tomcat out of the box bundle on top of Harmony. I've created such a bundle with the previous Harmony milestone release

svn commit: r593173 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-11-08 Thread jfclere
Author: jfclere Date: Thu Nov 8 06:41:50 2007 New Revision: 593173 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593173view=rev Log: Add another proposal. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL:

svn commit: r593238 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-11-08 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Nov 8 09:53:25 2007 New Revision: 593238 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593238view=rev Log: 2nd Patch includes the first, so combine them Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL:

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43819] - Support latest JSR245 proposal to make EL self-contained

2007-11-08 Thread Lucas Galfaso
Is CDDL Apache compatible? On Nov 8, 2007 8:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43819. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43819] - Support latest JSR245 proposal to make EL self-contained

2007-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43819. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43819] - Support latest JSR245 proposal to make EL self-contained

2007-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43819. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43819] - Support latest JSR245 proposal to make EL self-contained

2007-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43819. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43819] New: - Support latest JSR245 proposal to make EL self-contained

2007-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43819. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43819] - Support latest JSR245 proposal to make EL self-contained

2007-11-08 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I believe (and correct me if I am wrong) that Apache software may include the binary distribution of CDDL code. Correct. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43819] - Support latest JSR245 proposal to make EL self-contained

2007-11-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
I believe (and correct me if I am wrong) that Apache software may include the binary distribution of CDDL code. Filip Lucas Galfaso wrote: Is CDDL Apache compatible? On Nov 8, 2007 8:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15

2007-11-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: and we are re escaping already escaped strings.

Re: New Tomcat release? Out of the box bundle with Harmony?

2007-11-08 Thread Preston L. Bannister
On Nov 8, 2007 12:59 PM, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/11/8, Preston L. Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yes, any such bundle should be under Harmony, not Tomcat. Why not Tomcat ? If you are looking at Harmony, you are (or should be) expecting something experimental. Speaking as

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15

2007-11-08 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: and we are re escaping already escaped strings. The spec isn't 100% clear on who is responsible for escaping the values if required.

Re: New Tomcat release? Out of the box bundle with Harmony?

2007-11-08 Thread Henri Gomez
2007/11/8, Preston L. Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yes, any such bundle should be under Harmony, not Tomcat. Why not Tomcat ? Speaking as an application developer, the (outside?) chance that a customer could go to download Tomcat, and end up with Harmony - this does not make me happy. At

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15

2007-11-08 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: and we are re escaping already escaped strings. The spec isn't 100% clear on who is responsible for escaping the values if required. spec-quote section=SRV.16.1.1.1 ... The value can be anything the server

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43819] - Support latest JSR245 proposal to make EL self-contained

2007-11-08 Thread Mark Thomas
Lucas Galfaso wrote: Is CDDL Apache compatible? Not for java source, no. See http://people.apache.org/~rubys/3party.html We can't use this patch. Mark On Nov 8, 2007 8:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15

2007-11-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: and we are re escaping already escaped strings. The spec isn't 100% clear on who is responsible for escaping the values if required. spec-quote section=SRV.16.1.1.1

svn commit: r593264 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-11-08 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Nov 8 11:18:07 2007 New Revision: 593264 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593264view=rev Log: Add vote on cookie patch Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL:

svn commit: r593270 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-11-08 Thread pero
Author: pero Date: Thu Nov 8 11:37:59 2007 New Revision: 593270 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593270view=rev Log: add my vote Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL:

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.15

2007-11-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: and we are re escaping already escaped strings. The spec isn't 100%

svn commit: r593356 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

2007-11-08 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu Nov 8 15:32:52 2007 New Revision: 593356 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593356view=rev Log: change vote, still couldn't get the tests through Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43821] New: - provide client AJP IP address

2007-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43821. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.