Author: billbarker
Date: Wed Feb 27 23:44:58 2008
New Revision: 631878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631878&view=rev
Log:
casting vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.tx
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
Dr. Albrecht Weinert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL P
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 17:08 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
This makes me think there's a straight issue in CharChunk (I suppose the
problem is that realReadChars gets called with len = 0; if it handled
that scenario, things should be fi
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 17:08 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > This makes me think there's a straight issue in CharChunk (I suppose the
> > problem is that realReadChars gets called with len = 0; if it handled
> > that scenario, things should be fine).
> >
> the ol
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44502
--- Comment #3 from Emile Litvak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 16:25:15 ---
Filip, I complitely understand that this is really hard to do anything about
without a repro case. Unfortunately the repro is not possible. I believe it
only h
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:04 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
unfortunately, the "elegant" solution caused a regression :(
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44494
I tested this with the inelegant (original proposed) patch a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44502
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Pierret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 16:01:11
---
NIO connector relies on Java technology that had some bugs until very recent
versions of JDK/JRE.
We experienced similar behavior using NIO connector wi
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:04 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >> unfortunately, the "elegant" solution caused a regression :(
> >> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44494
> >> I tested this with the inelegant (original proposed) patch and it
> >> worked
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 12:51 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
h
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 12:51 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
h
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 12:51 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Bill Barker wrote:
> > "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> >>
> >>> Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
> >>> http://people.ap
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44342
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44485
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
Brandon DuRette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44423
--- Comment #3 from Tom Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 13:29:53 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind for a minute.
> This has now been fixed in 6.0.x and will be in 6.0.17 onwards.
>
> For the re
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Feb 27 13:01:17 2008
New Revision: 631725
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631725&view=rev
Log:
add link to original patch proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44494
--- Comment #3 from Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 12:22:56 ---
URL to fix
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=631700
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You a
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44494
--- Comment #2 from Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 12:20:50 ---
This has been fixed in the trunk, proposals to fix it in 6.0.x and 5.5.x have
been added.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cg
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Feb 27 12:19:27 2008
New Revision: 631705
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631705&view=rev
Log:
add proposal and votes
Modified:
tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Feb 27 12:18:04 2008
New Revision: 631704
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631704&view=rev
Log:
propose correct fix for UTF parsing
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Feb 27 12:14:16 2008
New Revision: 631701
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631701&view=rev
Log:
update changelog
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/w
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Feb 27 12:12:18 2008
New Revision: 631700
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631700&view=rev
Log:
Revert back to original patch proposed for UTF8 parsing.
This also fixes the regression for 6.0.16 and 5.5.26 (and possibly 4.1.37)
mentioned in
http://issues.apache.org/
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/b2c/
This is what is happening
int cnt=conv.read( result, 0, BUFFER_SIZE
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44502
Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- C
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44502
Summary: NIO connector under heavy load drops incoming requests
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.16
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44299
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-27 08:59:23 ---
A couple of options are:
1) Display a page that tells the user to close the browser.
2) Close the browser
3) A variation of http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/TrueHttpLo
Create a Filter, map it to the relevant requests, and in your doFilter()
method do something like this:
chain.doFilter(
request,
new HttpServletResponseWrapper(httpres) {
public void setContentType(String type) {
}
public void setHeader(String name, String value) {
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Feb 27 05:07:21 2008
New Revision: 631578
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631578&view=rev
Log:
Add a test (for the read timeouts).
Added:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/test/org/apache/tomcat/jni/SocketServerTestSuite.java
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jn
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15967
Damien Bonvillain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTE
Hi all,
All http response generated by tomcat owns a http header item
"content-length".
How can I remove the item from the header of httpServletResponse?
The reason is generate chunked http response, according the RFC, there
should be no content-length item in http header when response is
ch
30 matches
Mail list logo