Re: Problems building 5.5.27 from source

2009-04-17 Thread Kirk True
Hi sebb, sebb wrote: On 17/04/2009, Kirk True wrote: Hi all, I had some problems building 5.5.27 as pulled from http://tomcat.apache.org/download-55.cgi. The first issue was that I couldn't use a JDK 1.4.2-level compiler as it chokes on the class format of the JUnit libraries. AF

Re: Problems building 5.5.27 from source

2009-04-17 Thread sebb
On 17/04/2009, Kirk True wrote: > Hi all, > > I had some problems building 5.5.27 as pulled from > http://tomcat.apache.org/download-55.cgi. > > The first issue was that I couldn't use a JDK 1.4.2-level compiler as it > chokes on the class format of the JUnit libraries. AFAIK it requires Java 1

Problems building 5.5.27 from source

2009-04-17 Thread Kirk True
Hi all, I had some problems building 5.5.27 as pulled from http://tomcat.apache.org/download-55.cgi. The first issue was that I couldn't use a JDK 1.4.2-level compiler as it chokes on the class format of the JUnit libraries. Using JDK 1.6 didn't work because of the fact that the java.sql.Wra

svn commit: r766075 - in /tomcat/trunk/java: javax/servlet/ javax/servlet/http/ org/apache/catalina/connector/ org/apache/catalina/core/ org/apache/jasper/servlet/

2009-04-17 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Apr 17 16:30:56 2009 New Revision: 766075 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=766075&view=rev Log: Update Servlet 3.0 classes to spec snapshot as of early March 2009. Still not final. Added: tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/AsyncDispatcher.java (with props) Remove

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46907] Jasper with log4j in web-app classpath and debug level enabled prevents reading HTTP POST stream from JSP

2009-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46907 --- Comment #11 from Kirk True 2009-04-17 09:03:24 PST --- I should mention I'm on Linux (Fedora 10 x64). Here's my java -version: java version "1.6.0_12" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_12-b04) Java HotSpot(

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46538] ETag must differ between compressed and uncompressed resource versions

2009-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538 --- Comment #10 from Remy Maucherat 2009-04-17 08:17:37 PST --- Yes, that's my point, the only solution I see in Tomcat 6 about this is an option to remove the etag if compression is active for the request. And about your spec quotin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47046] New: Shutdown does not unregister all MBeans

2009-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47046 Summary: Shutdown does not unregister all MBeans Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.18 Platform: PC OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.4 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priorit

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46538] ETag must differ between compressed and uncompressed resource versions

2009-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538 --- Comment #9 from Oliver Schoett 2009-04-17 07:59:02 PST --- Yes, sorry, the patch is indeed not sufficient. It fixes the "sending" side of the problem in that it sends out ETags that conform to the spec. However, I now understand

Re: svn commit: r765764 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2009-04-17 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:38 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Can you remember what didn't work with Transfer-Encoding? > > I don't remember, it was years ago. I simply used the encoding name > specified in T-E to add the compression input filter (for input) rather > than using

Re: svn commit: r765764 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2009-04-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:38 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:09 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> Having now read Roy's comment on 39727 I'm leaning towards reverting > >> this patch and seeing what is possible following the Transfer-Encoding > >> route. I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46907] Jasper with log4j in web-app classpath and debug level enabled prevents reading HTTP POST stream from JSP

2009-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46907 --- Comment #10 from IzhikovNikolay 2009-04-17 03:00:59 PST --- I still can't reproduce the bug. I'm on WindowsXP jdk - 1.6.0_07 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are recei

svn commit: r765909 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11: Http11AprProcessor.java Http11NioProcessor.java InternalAprOutputBuffer.java InternalNioOutputBuffer.java

2009-04-17 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Apr 17 08:50:50 2009 New Revision: 765909 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765909&view=rev Log: Remove code that was marked for removal in r300602 Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11AprProcessor.java tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46538] ETag must differ between compressed and uncompressed resource versions

2009-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538 --- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas 2009-04-17 01:44:38 PST --- I've reverted the fix from trunk and withdrawn the backport proposal as whilst it fixed this issue, it introduced others. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bug

svn commit: r765902 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11: Constants.java Http11AprProcessor.java Http11NioProcessor.java Http11Processor.java

2009-04-17 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Apr 17 08:43:34 2009 New Revision: 765902 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765902&view=rev Log: Revert r765727 (fix for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538) - it fixes the reported issue but introduces other issues. Modified: tomcat/trunk/ja

svn commit: r765900 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2009-04-17 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Apr 17 08:40:48 2009 New Revision: 765900 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765900&view=rev Log: Withdraw the proposal whilst we discuss alternative solutions Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apac

Re: svn commit: r765764 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2009-04-17 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:09 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Having now read Roy's comment on 39727 I'm leaning towards reverting >> this patch and seeing what is possible following the Transfer-Encoding >> route. I'll sleep on it in case a better idea occurs to me and come back