Hi sebb,
sebb wrote:
On 17/04/2009, Kirk True wrote:
Hi all,
I had some problems building 5.5.27 as pulled from
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-55.cgi.
The first issue was that I couldn't use a JDK 1.4.2-level compiler as it
chokes on the class format of the JUnit libraries.
AF
On 17/04/2009, Kirk True wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had some problems building 5.5.27 as pulled from
> http://tomcat.apache.org/download-55.cgi.
>
> The first issue was that I couldn't use a JDK 1.4.2-level compiler as it
> chokes on the class format of the JUnit libraries.
AFAIK it requires Java 1
Hi all,
I had some problems building 5.5.27 as pulled from
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-55.cgi.
The first issue was that I couldn't use a JDK 1.4.2-level compiler as it
chokes on the class format of the JUnit libraries. Using JDK 1.6 didn't
work because of the fact that the java.sql.Wra
Author: markt
Date: Fri Apr 17 16:30:56 2009
New Revision: 766075
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=766075&view=rev
Log:
Update Servlet 3.0 classes to spec snapshot as of early March 2009. Still not
final.
Added:
tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/AsyncDispatcher.java (with props)
Remove
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46907
--- Comment #11 from Kirk True 2009-04-17 09:03:24 PST
---
I should mention I'm on Linux (Fedora 10 x64). Here's my java -version:
java version "1.6.0_12"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_12-b04)
Java HotSpot(
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538
--- Comment #10 from Remy Maucherat 2009-04-17 08:17:37 PST
---
Yes, that's my point, the only solution I see in Tomcat 6 about this is an
option to remove the etag if compression is active for the request.
And about your spec quotin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47046
Summary: Shutdown does not unregister all MBeans
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.18
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.4
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538
--- Comment #9 from Oliver Schoett
2009-04-17 07:59:02 PST ---
Yes, sorry, the patch is indeed not sufficient. It fixes the "sending" side of
the problem in that it sends out ETags that conform to the spec. However, I
now understand
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:38 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Can you remember what didn't work with Transfer-Encoding?
>
> I don't remember, it was years ago. I simply used the encoding name
> specified in T-E to add the compression input filter (for input) rather
> than using
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:38 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:09 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> Having now read Roy's comment on 39727 I'm leaning towards reverting
> >> this patch and seeing what is possible following the Transfer-Encoding
> >> route. I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46907
--- Comment #10 from IzhikovNikolay 2009-04-17
03:00:59 PST ---
I still can't reproduce the bug.
I'm on WindowsXP
jdk - 1.6.0_07
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are recei
Author: markt
Date: Fri Apr 17 08:50:50 2009
New Revision: 765909
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765909&view=rev
Log:
Remove code that was marked for removal in r300602
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11AprProcessor.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas 2009-04-17 01:44:38 PST ---
I've reverted the fix from trunk and withdrawn the backport proposal as whilst
it fixed this issue, it introduced others.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bug
Author: markt
Date: Fri Apr 17 08:43:34 2009
New Revision: 765902
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765902&view=rev
Log:
Revert r765727 (fix for
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538) - it fixes the
reported issue but introduces other issues.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/ja
Author: markt
Date: Fri Apr 17 08:40:48 2009
New Revision: 765900
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765900&view=rev
Log:
Withdraw the proposal whilst we discuss alternative solutions
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apac
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:09 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Having now read Roy's comment on 39727 I'm leaning towards reverting
>> this patch and seeing what is possible following the Transfer-Encoding
>> route. I'll sleep on it in case a better idea occurs to me and come back
16 matches
Mail list logo