2010/4/14 Mladen Turk :
> On 04/14/2010 10:48 AM, kfuj...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Author: kfujino
>>
>> Modified:
>> tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/session/StandardManager.java
>>
>> + session.expire();
>> + }
>> sessionCount
On 15/04/2010 01:31, sebb wrote:
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
...
> There is a minor problem with the bin/tomcat-juli.jar - the NOTICE says:
> Copyright 19...@year@
I'll take a look.
Same problem in extras/tomcat-juli-adapters.jar
This is ex
On 15/04/2010 01:44, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
Just wonder does Tomcat 7 RC fully support Servlet 3.0 ? The last time I
check it, it seems that ServletContainerInitializer has not been implemented
yet.
Thanks !
Yep. That looks like a (fairly large) oversight. I'll go back through
the spec and s
On 15/04/2010, Ivan wrote:
> Usually, I trust the real codes more :-)
> Just grep the Tomcat trunk codes with 'ServletContainerInitializer', I only
> found an empty if block in AnnotationProcessor.java file.
In that case maybe you have found a discrepancy between the release
notes and the code
Usually, I trust the real codes more :-)
Just grep the Tomcat trunk codes with 'ServletContainerInitializer', I only
found an empty if block in AnnotationProcessor.java file.
2010/4/15 sebb
> The RELEASE-NOTES file says:
>
>
> =
> Bundled APIs:
> =
> A standard installat
The RELEASE-NOTES file says:
=
Bundled APIs:
=
A standard installation of Tomcat 7.0 makes all of the following APIs available
for use by web applications (by placing them in "lib"):
* servlet-api.jar (Servlet 3.0 API)
On 15/04/2010, Ivan wrote:
> Hi,
>Just wonder
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130
Summary: NSIS - clarify that service is always installed
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Hi,
Just wonder does Tomcat 7 RC fully support Servlet 3.0 ? The last time I
check it, it seems that ServletContainerInitializer has not been implemented
yet.
Thanks !
2010/4/15 sebb
> On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > There is a mino
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
...
> > There is a minor problem with the bin/tomcat-juli.jar - the NOTICE says:
> > Copyright 19...@year@
>
> I'll take a look.
>
Same problem in extras/tomcat-juli-adapters.jar
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49122
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas 2010-04-14 19:34:37 EDT ---
I like the addition of the announce list but the larger test feels a little 'in
your face'. Could you reduce the font size for the blod bits to be closer to
the previous version?
On 4/14/2010 5:32 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 14/04/2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> On 4/14/2010 4:22 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> > Also, SVN is considered by some to be publishing code (e.g. links are
>> > usually published on the web-site) so better safe than sorry.
>>
>>
>> SVN is a development/wor
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49024
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 23:17:26 2010
New Revision: 934239
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934239&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49024
Enhance the RemoteIpFilter docs
Patch provided by Cyrille Le Clerc
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/conf
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49129
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 23:13:45 2010
New Revision: 934238
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934238&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49129
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/DigestAuthenticator.java
Modified:
tomcat/t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49127
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
Severity|normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49129
Summary: DigestAuthenticator.md5Helper - possible incorrect
lazy initialisation
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: N
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
Severity|normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
Summary: loader.WebappClassLoader.start() ignores Exception
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
Severity|normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49127
Summary: SimpleTcpReplicationManager.startInternal() ignores
Exception
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49125
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
Severity|normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126
Summary: jasper.compiler.Generator.createJspId() can generate
negative number
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49124
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49125
Summary: toString on byte[] array probably is not correct
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Pr
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49124
Summary: util.http.FastHttpDateFormat odd synchronisation
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Pr
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 22:50:35 2010
New Revision: 934234
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934234&view=rev
Log:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
Use StringBuilder rather than concatenation
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet.java
Mo
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 22:47:57 2010
New Revision: 934233
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934233&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110
Make inner class static to prevent possible memory leak - found by FindBugs
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49109
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 22:43:37 2010
New Revision: 934232
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934232&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49109
Remove unused authenticate() method with a broken default impl
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catal
On 14/04/2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 4/14/2010 4:22 PM, sebb wrote:
> >
> > Also, SVN is considered by some to be publishing code (e.g. links are
> > usually published on the web-site) so better safe than sorry.
>
>
> SVN is a development/work product area. Although now we have dist.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49108
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49106
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 22:29:34 2010
New Revision: 934225
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934225&view=rev
Log:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49106
Remove unused import
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/realm/JNDIRealm.java
Modified: tomcat/tru
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49105
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 22:27:59 2010
New Revision: 934224
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934224&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49105
Misc Javadoc corrections.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/javax/el/ExpressionFactory.java
tomcat/trunk/java
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 22:24:17 2010
New Revision: 934223
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934223&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104
Generics
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpProtocol.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apach
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 22:19:33 2010
New Revision: 934222
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934222&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
Add @Override where appropriate
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol.java
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49102
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
Severity|normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49101
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Mark
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 22:10:35 2010
New Revision: 934219
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934219&view=rev
Log:
CPL allows us to elect to distribute under a later version of the license so
elect to distribute under EPL as we are already using EPL for Eclipse JDT.
Modified:
tomca
On 4/14/2010 4:22 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> Also, SVN is considered by some to be publishing code (e.g. links are
> usually published on the web-site) so better safe than sorry.
SVN is a development/work product area. Although now we have dist.apache.org/
which is, pretty clearly, a dist'ribution poin
On 14/04/2010 21:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
>> 2 files in BCEL have IBM headers; these headers are presumably OK, but
>> the NOTICE file probably needs to mention IBM. Not sure why the BCEL
>> source archive does not do so in its NOTICE file. That might be an
>> error
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 21:40:13 2010
New Revision: 934207
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934207&view=rev
Log:
Don't include modules in the src release
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/build.xml?re
On 14/04/2010 22:22, sebb wrote:
> On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
>> > Many of the java and xml files in tomcat-lite don't have AL headers.
>>
>> Not an issue. tomcat-lite isn't being shipped (at least it shoudln't be..)
>
> It's currently in the source arc
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 21:25:20 2010
New Revision: 934203
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934203&view=rev
Log:
Parametrise current year in all embedded NOTICE files
Don't use the same property name for different output files
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.xml
tomcat/trunk/res/
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
> > Many of the java and xml files in tomcat-lite don't have AL headers.
>
> Not an issue. tomcat-lite isn't being shipped (at least it shoudln't be..)
It's currently in the source archives.
Also, SVN is considered by some to
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 20:51:19 2010
New Revision: 934192
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934192&view=rev
Log:
Add license headers to NSIS files
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/res/config.ini
tomcat/trunk/res/jvm.ini
Modified: tomcat/trunk/res/config.ini
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
> Many of the java and xml files in tomcat-lite don't have AL headers.
Not an issue. tomcat-lite isn't being shipped (at least it shoudln't be..)
> The following other files don't have AL headers:
>
> res/config.ini
> res/jvm.ini
> test/org/apache/coyote/http11/Te
On 04/14/2010 01:58 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.04.2010 20:52, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 04/14/2010 08:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.04.2010 16:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apr 14, 2010 4:12:16 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina
startInternal
INFO: Server startup in 965 ms
^^
Impressive!
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 20:18:14 2010
New Revision: 934173
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934173&view=rev
Log:
AL2 header
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/coyote/http11/TestInternalInputBuffer.java
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/naming/resources/TestBaseDirContext.java
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 20:11:59 2010
New Revision: 934170
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934170&view=rev
Log:
Tomcat 7 needs Java 6
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/res/jvm.ini
Modified: tomcat/trunk/res/jvm.ini
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/res/jvm.ini?rev=934170&r1=9
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
> alternative approach and use explicit release candidates for 7.0.x. I'm
> expecting to tweak the release process as we go.
>
> The first Tomcat 7 release candiate is ready for t
On 14.04.2010 20:52, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 04/14/2010 08:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.04.2010 16:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apr 14, 2010 4:12:16 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina
startInternal
INFO: Server startup in 965 ms
^^
Impressive!
8 core i7 does the remaining :)
Naaa, s
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/7.0.0-RC1
Apr 14, 2010 9:00:34 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployWAR
INFO: Deploying web application archive webtest.war
Apr 14, 2010 9:00:34 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig
deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application director
On 04/14/2010 08:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.04.2010 16:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apr 14, 2010 4:12:16 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina
startInternal
INFO: Server startup in 965 ms
^^
Impressive!
8 core i7 does the remaining :)
Cheers
--
^TM
-
On 14.04.2010 16:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apr 14, 2010 4:12:16 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina startInternal
INFO: Server startup in 965 ms
^^
Impressive!
Cheers,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe,
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49100
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Mark
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 18:00:34 2010
New Revision: 934067
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934067&view=rev
Log:
Add info on API stability to the release.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES
Modified: tomcat/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/REL
Hi,
I was going through tomcat source code. (Specifically
ApplicationDispatcher.java). The way HttpServletRequestWrapper is used
there, puzzled me. What is the intent of all the methods of
HttpServletRequestWrapper class in
servlet api?
Specifically HttpServletRequestWrapper's setRequest method lo
On 14/04/2010 11:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
> [X] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
> [ ] Stable - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
>
>
On 04/14/2010 04:13 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 04/14/2010 03:35 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> The APR gives some errors for example Address already in use:8080
>> on my Linux box. All other test/plaforms look ok.
>>
>
> Seems you have a broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49082
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 14:46:07 2010
New Revision: 933972
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933972&view=rev
Log:
Fully fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49082
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/javax/el/ExpressionFactory.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/javax/el/Exp
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49082
Robert Goff changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
On 04/14/2010 03:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/04/2010 14:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>>> The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
>>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>>> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
>>> [X] Beta - go ahead and
On 04/14/2010 03:35 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The APR gives some errors for example Address already in use:8080
on my Linux box. All other test/plaforms look ok.
Seems you have a broken linux box :)
Here is mine dump on RHEL-5
Apr 14, 2010 4:0
On 14/04/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> >
> > The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
> > [ ] Broken - do not release
> > [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
> > [ ] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
> > [X] Stable - g
On 14/04/2010 14:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
>> [X] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
>
> The APR g
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49122
--- Comment #1 from Pid 2010-04-14 09:41:54 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25295)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25295)
Modified ROOT app index.html
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/u
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49122
Summary: Update of ROOT application index.html
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
> alternative approach and use explicit release candidates for 7.0.x. I'm
> expecting to tweak the release process as we go.
>
> The first Tomcat 7 release candiate is ready
On 04/14/2010 07:07 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/4/13 Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:
This makes zero sense and I would do a -1 on this commit and the bug in
general.
What effectively has happened here is that there has been a public API
change without any justification.
Since this is a muta
2010/4/13 Filip Hanik - Dev Lists :
> This makes zero sense and I would do a -1 on this commit and the bug in
> general.
> What effectively has happened here is that there has been a public API
> change without any justification.
>
> Since this is a mutable field, you've now made it non mutable. an
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
[ ] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
[X] Stable - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
Teste
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49045
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 12:07:04 2010
New Revision: 933921
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933921&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49045
Add support for adding Services and Engines via JMX
Based on a patch by Chamith Buddhika
Modified:
tomcat/t
On 14/04/2010 12:02, sebb wrote:
> On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Please test this release candidate and provide feedback.
>
> Some bugs reported against Tomcat 7 may require API changes to fix.
> Are API changes going to be possible once the RC has been released?
Yes. I still have some L
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
> alternative approach and use explicit release candidates for 7.0.x. I'm
> expecting to tweak the release process as we go.
>
> The first Tomcat 7 release candiate is ready for t
us...@tomcat.apache.org
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Vivek Kanchan
wrote:
> please give me the id..
> thanks
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:02 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Need help in sett
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/04/2010 17:48, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> > This makes zero sense and I would do a -1 on this commit and the bug in
> > general.
> > What effectively has happened here is that there has been a public API
> > change without any justification.
> >
please give me the id..
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:02 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Need help in setting up virtual url for tomcat 5
On 14/04/2010 11:29, Vivek Kanchan wrote:
> HI,
>
> I have set
All,
After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
alternative approach and use explicit release candidates for 7.0.x. I'm
expecting to tweak the release process as we go.
The first Tomcat 7 release candiate is ready for testing. 7.0.0-RC1 can
be obtained from:
http://peop
On 14/04/2010 11:29, Vivek Kanchan wrote:
> HI,
>
> I have setup tomcat 5 for a customer, now i need to use virtual url and por=
> t
> t other than 8080 , please let me know how to do it , what files to change =
> for these.
Please use the Tomcat users mailing list.
Mark
HI,
I have setup tomcat 5 for a customer, now i need to use virtual url and por=
t
t other than 8080 , please let me know how to do it , what files to change =
for these.
Thanks,
Vivyek kanchan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49120
Pid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49120
Summary: gc new capacity of JVM is gradually reducing when
webapp(tomcat) started
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.13
Platform: Sun
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NE
Author: markt
Date: Wed Apr 14 10:14:34 2010
New Revision: 933907
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933907&view=rev
Log:
Alternative fix for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49089
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/io/ChannelData.java
Modified: tomc
On 13/04/2010 17:48, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> This makes zero sense and I would do a -1 on this commit and the bug in
> general.
> What effectively has happened here is that there has been a public API
> change without any justification.
>
> Since this is a mutable field, you've now made i
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
Summary: Inefficient use of String concatenation in loop
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Pri
On 04/14/2010 10:48 AM, kfuj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kfujino
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/session/StandardManager.java
+session.expire();
+}
sessionCounter++;
Seems we are using the sessionCounter a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43642
Ruediger Pluem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25291|Patch against Tomcat trunk |Patch against Tomcat 6.0
d
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43642
--- Comment #5 from Ruediger Pluem 2010-04-14 05:15:01 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=25292)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25292)
Patch against Tomcat trunk
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43642
--- Comment #4 from Ruediger Pluem 2010-04-14 05:14:34 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=25291)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25291)
Patch against Tomcat trunk
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49116
--- Comment #2 from Keiichi Fujino 2010-04-14 04:57:53 EDT
---
Fixed in trunk and proposed for 6.0.x.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Y
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
