Dear wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification.
The page "2244" has been deleted by StefanBodewig.
The comment on this change is: remove spam.
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/2244
-
To uns
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change
notification.
The "2244" page has been changed by 2244.
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/2244
--
New page:
Contingency Management Theory in the 20th cent
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539
Summary: tomcat delete webdir
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows Server 2003
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
--- Comment #3 from oschina.net 2010-07-01 19:51:20 EDT
---
Thanks for your reply :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assign
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49536
--- Comment #3 from S. Ali Tokmen 2010-07-01
18:54:53 EDT ---
This is very good news. Thank you very much.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 1 21:35:19 2010
New Revision: 959790
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959790&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49536
Ensure a 404 response for an unmapped request when no ROOT context is deployed.
Most of the change is getting th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49536
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
my vote, btw...
On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>
> According to the release process, the 5.5.30 build corresponding
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509
--- Comment #5 from Jesse Barnum 2010-07-01 17:07:52
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is a configuration issue that belongs on the users mailing list
At a minimum, it seems as if the documentation is incorrect and should be
fixed.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49509
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 1 19:37:40 2010
New Revision: 959756
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959756&view=rev
Log:
Fix typo
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java
URL:
http
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On 01/07/2010 21:27, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: ma...@apache.org [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Subject: svn commit: r959736 - in /tomcat/trunk:
java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java
webapps/docs/changelog.xml
unregister(onameNamingResoucres);
onameNamingResouc
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 1 19:33:45 2010
New Revision: 959754
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959754&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525
Cookies for ROOT context need a path of /
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/Application
> From: ma...@apache.org [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Subject: svn commit: r959736 - in /tomcat/trunk:
> java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java
> webapps/docs/changelog.xml
>
> unregister(onameNamingResoucres);
> onameNamingResoucres = register(namingResources,
Just c
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49522
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 1 18:06:47 2010
New Revision: 959736
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959736&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49522
Just use host and path in NamingResources MBean name rather than full Context
MBean name
Modified:
tomcat/
2010/7/1 Jim Jagielski :
>
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>
>> 2010/7/1 Jim Jagielski :
>>> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
>>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>>>
>> I see the
On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/7/1 Jim Jagielski :
>> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>>
> I see them there but Apache says 403 Forbid
2010/7/1 Jim Jagielski :
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>
I see them there but Apache says 403 Forbidden when I try to download
any of the files.
Best regards
Konstanti
On 01.07.2010 17:20, Marc Guillemot wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
...
I run a daily test and just looked to what breaks it and complain.
Now I am looking to Peter's application to find what is broken.
so you're the continuous integration server ;-)
Can you publish break information or is
On 01/07/2010 16:21, supernandu wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm using the Apache Commons FileUpload lib and I'm getting this strange
> behaviour in just one of my servers. All others work perfectly.
>
> servletfileupload.parseRequest(request) always returns an empty list.
>
> But if I check for:
>
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.30 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_30 [1] is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
+++
On Jun 30, 2010, at 3:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 06/30/2010 05:20 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2010/6/29 jean-frederic clere :
>>> Due to bugs (49445 and 49424) and as I was not able to finish the
>>> release process quickly (because of working remotely) and as releases
>>> are ch
On 07/01/2010 11:21 AM, supernandu wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm using the Apache Commons FileUpload lib and I'm getting this strange
behaviour in just one of my servers. All others work perfectly.
servletfileupload.parseRequest(request) always returns an empty list.
But if I check for:
ServletFileUplo
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48817
--- Comment #9 from Matt Passell 2010-07-01
11:41:13 EDT ---
Any feedback on my second patch? I've been using it in production for more
than a month now with no obvious issues. I realize that you guys are probably
busy getting Tomcat 7 r
Hi guys,
I'm using the Apache Commons FileUpload lib and I'm getting this strange
behaviour in just one of my servers. All others work perfectly.
servletfileupload.parseRequest(request) always returns an empty list.
But if I check for:
ServletFileUpload.isMultipartContent(request)
This return
jean-frederic clere wrote:
...
I run a daily test and just looked to what breaks it and complain.
Now I am looking to Peter's application to find what is broken.
so you're the continuous integration server ;-)
Can you publish break information or is it forbidden by the TCK
license/agreement?
Author: jim
Date: Thu Jul 1 15:09:52 2010
New Revision: 959690
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959690&view=rev
Log:
Tagging Tomcat version TOMCAT_5_5_30.
Added:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/tags/TOMCAT_5_5_30/
- copied from r959689, tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/
-
Author: jim
Date: Thu Jul 1 13:13:14 2010
New Revision: 959645
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959645&view=rev
Log:
jim RMing 5.5.30
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/container/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/container/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn
Author: jim
Date: Thu Jul 1 13:09:09 2010
New Revision: 959644
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959644&view=rev
Log:
Push for 5.5.30
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/build/build.properties.default
Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/build/build.properties.default
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/v
Author: jim
Date: Thu Jul 1 13:08:51 2010
New Revision: 959643
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959643&view=rev
Log:
Note Windows requirement
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/build/BUILDING.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/build/BUILDING.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|trunk |7.0.0
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thoma
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 1 11:28:49 2010
New Revision: 959620
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959620&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
Correct typo
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/extras.xml
Mo
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 1 09:57:07 2010
New Revision: 959580
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959580&view=rev
Log:
Improve default security settings. Enable the LockOutRealm by default.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/conf/server.xml
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tom
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jul 1 09:35:23 2010
New Revision: 959568
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=959568&view=rev
Log:
Improve handling for method invocation in EL, in particular the method used to
identify the method to invoke. This reverts r953440 and implements a more
comprehensive solu
On 07/01/2010 09:28 AM, Marc Guillemot wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> nice to see some activity on this thread.
>
>> If you were following the dev list you would have seen that
>> Jean-Frederic has already vetoed the change Peter made on the basis
>> that it breaks the TCK. That suggests that Peter's anal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49536
--- Comment #1 from S. Ali Tokmen 2010-07-01
04:08:00 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25676)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25676)
Attachment of the log displayed on console when I access a page, I see a
NullP
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49536
Summary: If no webapps deployed, accessing a URL returns 200 OK
with no content instead of 404
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Mac OS X 10
On 01/07/2010 09:28, Marc Guillemot wrote:
For me there is a point that is particularly interesting in Peter's email:
> It seams that we better start a open test suite implementation at the
> new Servlet 3.0 API.
Tomcat's test suite is quite minimal even if I recognize that promising
progress
Hi Mark,
nice to see some activity on this thread.
If you were following the dev list you would have seen that
Jean-Frederic has already vetoed the change Peter made on the basis that
it breaks the TCK. That suggests that Peter's analysis of the current
situation is not 100% correct.
I do f
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37449
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
43 matches
Mail list logo
