On 07/19/2010 07:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/07/2010 23:50, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 18.07.2010 02:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 18/07/2010 00:57, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Jul 17 23:57:23 2010
New Revision: 965150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/view
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
Jeremy Boynes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
Jim Anderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ez...@ieee.org
--
Configure bugmai
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
Summary: taglib statement is not causing a stack trace
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.28
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
Jim Anderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|taglib statement is not |taglib statement is causing
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49617
Summary: Fix ExpiresFilter docs (remove remaining ExpiresActive
reference)
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49617
--- Comment #1 from Cyrille Le Clerc 2010-07-19 17:45:19
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25785)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25785)
fixed docs
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userp
On 19/07/2010 15:36, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/7/19 Thomas Lee :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm quite new to the Tomcat code base, so apologies if I'm asking a dumb
>> question.
>>
>> I'm looking at:
>>
>>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49591
>>
>> I've hit a dead-end in the Sub
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Shirkov 2010-07-19 13:22:19
EDT ---
done
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48214
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
On 18/07/2010 23:50, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 18.07.2010 02:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 18/07/2010 00:57, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Sat Jul 17 23:57:23 2010
>>> New Revision: 965150
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=965150&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Restore pero's t
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.29/
According to the release process, the 6.0.29 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_29 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
2010/7/19 Thomas Lee :
> Hi all,
>
> I'm quite new to the Tomcat code base, so apologies if I'm asking a dumb
> question.
>
> I'm looking at:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49591
>
> I've hit a dead-end in the Subversion history trying to track down why the
> flushBuffer(
Hi All,
For the interested my work so far can be tracked in this Bugzilla entry[1].
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
Regards,
Chamith
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:00 PM, buddhika chamith
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As per my project with the GSOC I have been doing some work
Hi All,
As per my project with the GSOC I have been doing some work on improving
Tomcat JMX descriptors. So far I have gone through all the descriptors and
made changes where necessary (with the exceptions for couple of descriptors
which I am bit stuck currently) and most of them have been committ
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #64 from chamith buddhika 2010-07-19
10:25:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #63)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > It seems that o.a.Catalina.Core descriptor has got operations containing
> > POJO
> > objects instead of primitive
Hi all,
I'm quite new to the Tomcat code base, so apologies if I'm asking a dumb
question.
I'm looking at:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49591
I've hit a dead-end in the Subversion history trying to track down why the
flushBuffer() call was ever added to StandardHostVal
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Jul 19 12:53:37 2010
New Revision: 965462
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=965462&view=rev
Log:
Revert r965460.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.properties.default
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.properties.default
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/to
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Jul 19 12:51:03 2010
New Revision: 965461
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=965461&view=rev
Log:
tag for 6.0.29
Added:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_29/ (props changed)
- copied from r965460, tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/
Propchange: tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Jul 19 12:49:02 2010
New Revision: 965460
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=965460&view=rev
Log:
For release 6.0.29
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.properties.default
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.properties.default
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
Author: kkolinko
Date: Mon Jul 19 12:21:42 2010
New Revision: 965451
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=965451&view=rev
Log:
change vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?r
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49613
--- Comment #5 from Sampo Savolainen 2010-07-19 08:18:52 EDT ---
Can you abbreviate on how I did not understand the code correctly?
This is how I understood it:
'getAttributes(Globals.CERTIFICATES_ATTR)' is called when a secure connectio
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49613
--- Comment #4 from Remy Maucherat 2010-07-19 07:51:06 EDT ---
Looking at your patch, you apparently did not understand the code. But I can
see you might incur a performance problem if SSL is enabled and there's no
certificate chain (at lea
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49613
--- Comment #3 from Sampo Savolainen 2010-07-19 06:44:20 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25783)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25783)
Proposed patch to specified issue
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apa
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49613
--- Comment #2 from Sampo Savolainen 2010-07-19 06:41:28 EDT ---
Application frameworks like MyFaces use attributes while rendering a page.
Tomcat reads all SSL connector attributes for every call to
getAttributeNames(). This creates a larg
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49613
--- Comment #1 from Sampo Savolainen 2010-07-19 06:28:59 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25782)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25782)
Profiler screenshot
This is a screenshot from a profiler. It shows how a JS
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49613
Sampo Savolainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Request.getAttributeNames() |Request.getAttributeNames()
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49613
Summary: Request.getAttributeNames()
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.28
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Compone
28 matches
Mail list logo
