Broken Link on Tomcat 7 dev page

2010-08-11 Thread Alexander Shirkov
Link located on page: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/index.html Status - Apache Tomcat development status.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49670] org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn valve does not function

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49670 --- Comment #7 from chorn...@hotmail.com 2010-08-11 23:23:54 EDT --- I have added two war files, he server configuration, jaas configuration and the source code for the jaas implementation I used in this test case. Accessing the first web a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49670] org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn valve does not function

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49670 --- Comment #6 from chorn...@hotmail.com 2010-08-11 23:21:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=25883) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25883) eclipse jaas implementation project zipped. This is the zipped eclipse p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49670] org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn valve does not function

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49670 --- Comment #5 from chorn...@hotmail.com 2010-08-11 23:17:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=25882) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25882) server.xml with sso valve enabled. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49670] org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn valve does not function

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49670 --- Comment #4 from chorn...@hotmail.com 2010-08-11 23:16:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=25881) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25881) The tomcat jaas configuration file used on the test server. -- Configur

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49670] org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn valve does not function

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49670 --- Comment #3 from chorn...@hotmail.com 2010-08-11 23:14:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=25880) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25880) Second participating web appliaction. -- Configure bugmail: https://iss

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49670] org.apache.catalina.authenticator.SingleSignOn valve does not function

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49670 --- Comment #2 from chorn...@hotmail.com 2010-08-11 23:14:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=25879) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25879) First participating war file. Please add the jaas.jar file from this pro

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49234] JMX Descriptor Modifications

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #78 from chamith buddhika 2010-08-11 23:09:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #77) > Just as a reminder remember one of the goals of this work was to be able to > start with a 'blank' server object and completely configure a Tomca

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

2010-08-11 Thread Rainer Jung
On 12.08.2010 00:11, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2010/8/12: The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tomcat-trunk on ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/373 (..) BUILD FAILED: failed compile http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

2010-08-11 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/8/12 : > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tomcat-trunk on ASF Buildbot. > Full details are available at: >  http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/373 > (..) > > BUILD FAILED: failed compile > http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/373/steps/compile/logs/stdio

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

2010-08-11 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tomcat-trunk on ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/373 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: [branch tomcat/trunk] 9844

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49718] Fix for bug 46984 breaks HTTP 0.9 requests

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49718 --- Comment #1 from ni...@ieee.org 2010-08-11 17:38:42 EDT --- Tested same scenario with: ./version.sh Using CATALINA_BASE: /localdisk/data/apps/apache-tomcat-6.0.29 Using CATALINA_HOME: /localdisk/data/apps/apache-tomcat-6.0.29 Using

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48701] jsp:getProperty broken for certain cases

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701 kwalk...@cisco.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Version|6.

svn commit: r984495 - in /tomcat/trunk: build.properties.default build.xml

2010-08-11 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Aug 11 17:55:14 2010 New Revision: 984495 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=984495&view=rev Log: Enable off-line building of extrsa - moves commons-logging libs to standard Tomcat lib download process Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default tomcat/trun

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49234] JMX Descriptor Modifications

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #77 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-11 13:07:03 EDT --- Just as a reminder remember one of the goals of this work was to be able to start with a 'blank' server object and completely configure a Tomcat instance via JMX. i.e. add a servi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49234] JMX Descriptor Modifications

2010-08-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #76 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-11 12:59:22 EDT --- Thanks for the updated patch. I wasn't thinking of explicitly setting startChildren in the addChild() method but it is a good idea and I like it. However, you need to rework your

Re: SharingWebappClassLoader proposal

2010-08-11 Thread Lohner Roland
Dear Mark, Rainer, Konstantin, Sylvain, Thank you for your answers. (and for Tomcat ;-) Regards, R. 2010/8/5 Sylvain Laurent > > I see 2 options for your case : > > - either use JRebel which allows to reload classes even in jars that would be > the common or shared classloaded (I use it all t