https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923
Summary: The latest thunk can't shutdown if add tomcat native
java library dll
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows Vista
Status:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49922
Summary: ApplicationFilterChain more than the same filter
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
On 09/13/2010 11:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I have the impression there is not enough dev time available at the moment for
bigger things like migrating it to APR, but a switch to 1.3 would allow us to
formulate a clear message (some incompatibilities, partially dropped support
and a couple of
>
> With this release, following the retirement of httpd-1.3 from all maintenance,
> would this be a good time to declare this the final native/apache-1.3/
> connector
> and remove that tree from svn at this point, prior to any 1.3.31 release?
+1.
On 9/13/2010 6:11 PM, Tim Whittington wrote:
> I agree with this approach.
>
> I'd like to get a 1.2.31 release out sometime to release the ISAPI
> Redirector log rotation though, before we start on 1.3.
Just to make sure there is no confusion, I'm speaking of dropping apache-1.3,
prior to 1.2.31
I agree with this approach.
I'd like to get a 1.2.31 release out sometime to release the ISAPI
Redirector log rotation though, before we start on 1.3.
cheers
tim
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 13.09.2010 23:17, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
>> On 9/13/2010 4:15 PM, Wil
On 9/13/2010 4:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> I don't have any problem of freezing the 1.3 support concerning features and
> minor bugs,
> but I find it a bit surprising for users to suddenly stop supporting 1.3. In
> my opinion we
> should still do security fixes when needed and critical bugs. M
On 13.09.2010 22:50, Wesley Acheson wrote:
Em what I mean is I don't see a trunk node within tc7.0x folder. Does
the trunk folder http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk
represent tomcat 7?
Yes, that's still true at the moment. It might change some time in the
future.
Regards,
Rainer
On 13.09.2010 23:17, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 9/13/2010 4:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 3/1/2010 4:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 stable.
With this release, following the retirement of httpd-
On 9/13/2010 4:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 3/1/2010 4:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of
>> Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 stable.
>
> With this release, following the retirement of httpd-1.3 from all maintenance,
> would this be
On 3/1/2010 4:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of
> Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 stable.
With this release, following the retirement of httpd-1.3 from all maintenance,
would this be a good time to declare this the final native/apache-1.3/ c
Em what I mean is I don't see a trunk node within tc7.0x folder. Does
the trunk folder http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk
represent tomcat 7?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional com
Author: markt
Date: Mon Sep 13 20:03:17 2010
New Revision: 996672
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996672&view=rev
Log:
Re-factoring the connectors. Remove large chunks of duplicated code in the
Processors. Some minor changes elsewhere to support the re-factoring.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48644
--- Comment #4 from Sebb 2010-09-13 14:38:17 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=26023)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26023)
Sample patch to fix some of the instances
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48644
Sebb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
Author: markt
Date: Mon Sep 13 17:28:53 2010
New Revision: 996608
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996608&view=rev
Log:
Code clean-up
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11AprProcessor.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11AprProtocol.java
tom
Author: mturk
Date: Mon Sep 13 16:50:19 2010
New Revision: 996600
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996600&view=rev
Log:
Add ASL headers to the hand-crafted files.
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/Makefile.vc
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/config.m4
tomcat/jk/trunk/n
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49884
Andrew Huntwork changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@huntwork.net
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49884
--- Comment #6 from Sebb 2010-09-13 12:13:42 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=26022)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26022)
Patch to make some private fields final
They are probably not a cause of the synch. iss
On 09/13/2010 11:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I just spotted that in a couple of places 6.0.29 reports itself as
> 6.0.0.29. Looking at the tag, it appears
>
> version.patch=29
>
> was used rather than
>
> version.build=29
>
> It isn't a major issue as in most places the version property is used
I just spotted that in a couple of places 6.0.29 reports itself as
6.0.0.29. Looking at the tag, it appears
version.patch=29
was used rather than
version.build=29
It isn't a major issue as in most places the version property is used
(which is set to 6.0.29).
Just something to keep in mind when
21 matches
Mail list logo
