Author: mturk
Date: Fri Sep 24 06:00:00 2010
New Revision: 1000718
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1000718view=rev
Log:
Fix Bz #49993 by checking the JAVA_HOME/JRE_HOME environment variables
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/bin/service.bat
Modified: tomcat/trunk/bin/service.bat
URL:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49993
Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49929
--- Comment #7 from Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org 2010-09-24 02:51:11 EDT ---
I'm still not been able to reproduce the stuff.
I don't use jmeter but rather a simple ab which can only hit a
single uri, so this might be the reason why its not
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49890
Andrey Timofeev andrey.timofe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--
Konstatin,
I think that this is not related with ResourceLink elements. When you define
global resource link in your Context.xml, Tomcat creates ResourceLinkRef for
this entry. Then same scenario exists, it creates object using
ResourceLinkFactory and caches it. It is not desirable. Changing
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49994
Summary: NamingContext Possible Bug
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49994
--- Comment #1 from Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com 2010-09-24
08:00:08 EDT ---
Comments from David Jencks:
For reference, the EE 6 platform spec explains that usually a new instance
should be returned on each lookup in section
On 24 September 2010 07:00, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Sep 24 06:00:00 2010
New Revision: 1000718
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1000718view=rev
Log:
Fix Bz #49993 by checking the JAVA_HOME/JRE_HOME environment variables
Modified:
Mark,
On 9/20/2010 6:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/09/2010 15:04, Wesley Acheson wrote:
I think some documentation should be created on code style. Actually a
bit more than that I think some documentation should be written
saying.
http://tomcat.apache.org/getinvolved.html
As always,
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
--- Comment #4 from Wesley wesley.ache...@gmail.com 2010-09-24 16:03:43 EDT
---
Is this worth continuing with? I know its rough but I'd like to know if its a
start again job, or continue from here.
Wes
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
--- Comment #5 from Chuck Caldarale chuck.caldar...@unisys.com 2010-09-24
16:16:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Is this worth continuing with? I know its rough but I'd like to know if its a
start again job, or continue from here.
I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49998
Summary: ParserController.hasJspRoot() does not detect JSP as
using XML syntax if jsp:root namespace declaration
uses ' delimiters instead of
Product: Tomcat 6
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Summary: More bugs
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.31
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Catalina
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Pardon my language but WTF?
please don't respond GIYF.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:35 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Summary: More bugs
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.31
Platform: All
From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4] New: More bugs
Pardon my language but WTF?
I think Mr Rowe is actually issuing a compliment to the sterling efforts of
Mark T, albeit in a somewhat facetious manner. I'm surprised he didn't wait
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #1 from William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org 2010-09-24 17:58:06
EDT ---
One additional correction;
Although we might credit markt with mopping away many bugzilla issues, but in
all fairness, credit or blame for the lack of
On 9/24/2010 4:55 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4] New: More bugs
Pardon my language but WTF?
I think Mr Rowe is actually issuing a compliment to the sterling efforts of
Mark T, albeit in a
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 9/24/2010 4:55 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4] New: More bugs
Pardon my language but WTF?
I think Mr Rowe is
From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4] New: More bugs
And the veto wars? and regressions?
Haven't seen a veto war in quite a while.
There are lots of regressions, but they're most confined to trunk, not anything
users would normally see
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50001
Summary: Eclipse source files don't belong in project root.
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49955
--- Comment #3 from Wesley wesley.ache...@gmail.com 2010-09-24 22:11:55 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=26071)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26071)
Patch based on current svn to change to correct main class.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50001
Wesley wesley.ache...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26070|application/octet-stream|text/plain
23 matches
Mail list logo
