https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11248
--- Comment #2 from Artem Anisimov aanisi...@inbox.ru 2010-09-25 02:26:57 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=26072)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26072)
Patch that allows specifying expiration period for static
Hi Devs,
I just checked out the taglibs source code from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and try to
replace the sun implementation in my build.
But the first problem jumped in is that I can not even build it. Because
maven can not find its parent pom:
parent
Author: rjung
Date: Sat Sep 25 12:25:01 2010
New Revision: 1001203
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1001203view=rev
Log:
Welcome back.
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whoweare.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/whoweare.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whoweare.html
URL:
On 25 September 2010 07:37, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Devs,
I just checked out the taglibs source code from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and try to
replace the sun implementation in my build.
But the first problem jumped in is that I can not even
The meta tag google-site-verification is included in our main
index.html. It is not in the authoritative svn copy.
Is there a reason for that?
If yes, please do also add it to the authoritative site copy in svn
(/tomcat/site/trunk), otherwise remove.
Regards,
Rainer
On 14.09.2010 12:46, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Sep 14 10:46:00 2010
New Revision: 996830
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996830view=rev
Log:
This change requires JK_ISAPI, JK_NSAPI to be defined, drops JK_DLL_BASENAME
Modified:
On 14.09.2010 13:00, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Sep 14 11:00:40 2010
New Revision: 996836
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996836view=rev
Log:
Identify JK_ISAPI for jk_version.h PACKAGE definition
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
On 17.09.2010 15:44, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Sep 17 13:44:50 2010
New Revision: 998129
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=998129view=rev
Log:
Axe excess logging. We already logged that within jk_open_socket
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c
On 17.09.2010 15:26, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Sep 17 13:26:58 2010
New Revision: 998120
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=998120view=rev
Log:
Make sure errno survives JK_TRACE_EXIT call
Good catch!
WDYT about
Index: common/jk_logger.h
On 09/25/2010 03:00 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 17.09.2010 15:26, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Sep 17 13:26:58 2010
New Revision: 998120
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=998120view=rev
Log:
Make sure errno survives JK_TRACE_EXIT call
Good catch!
WDYT about
Index:
On 09/25/2010 02:50 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 17.09.2010 15:44, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Sep 17 13:44:50 2010
New Revision: 998129
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=998129view=rev
Log:
Axe excess logging. We already logged that within jk_open_socket
Modified:
On 23/09/2010 13:52, Pid wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing with a CLI, JMX and a few other things. At work I am
manually extracting and monitoring various bits of JMX data in order to
diagnose problems with Tomcat configs and applications.
There's lot of information available in the JVM
Author: rjung
Date: Sat Sep 25 14:28:36 2010
New Revision: 1001216
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1001216view=rev
Log:
Please no tabs.
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml
URL:
Author: rjung
Date: Sat Sep 25 14:34:25 2010
New Revision: 1001219
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1001219view=rev
Log:
Don't destroy errno during trace logging.
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common/jk_logger.h
tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml
Modified:
Author: rjung
Date: Sat Sep 25 14:43:25 2010
New Revision: 1001222
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1001222view=rev
Log:
Partial undo of r998120:
we now have a general errno protection in trace
logging, so we can stick to the simple coding idiom
(trace logging is last before return).
On 25.09.2010 14:47, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.09.2010 13:00, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Sep 14 11:00:40 2010
New Revision: 996836
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=996836view=rev
Log:
Identify JK_ISAPI for jk_version.h PACKAGE definition
Modified:
Author: rjung
Date: Sat Sep 25 15:55:24 2010
New Revision: 1001244
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1001244view=rev
Log:
Remove some more legacy (pre-beta) revision check
within mod_jk.c.
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Modified:
On 22.09.2010 16:36, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Sep 22 14:36:59 2010
New Revision: 83
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=83view=rev
Log:
Backport the unlockAccept
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
On 09/25/2010 06:11 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
This commit changed umlauts in changelog.xml from ISO to UTF in a couple of
places. I'm not sure that's OK.
Ni idea. However my box has utf-8 locale, so might be my editor to blame.
However the
On 25/09/2010 13:33, Rainer Jung wrote:
The meta tag google-site-verification is included in our main
index.html. It is not in the authoritative svn copy.
Is there a reason for that?
If yes, please do also add it to the authoritative site copy in svn
(/tomcat/site/trunk), otherwise
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49159
--- Comment #8 from sylvain.laur...@gmail.com 2010-09-25 18:42:53 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=26074)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26074)
proposed patch to renew threads one by one with a delay
I explored
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49159
--- Comment #9 from sylvain.laur...@gmail.com 2010-09-25 18:51:53 EDT ---
What do you think ? If we don't use a fair queue, we do not have a
deterministic behavior and some thread might still trigger a memory leak...
Unless we have
22 matches
Mail list logo
