Author: mturk
Date: Fri Oct 22 06:35:25 2010
New Revision: 1026222
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026222view=rev
Log:
Use version suffix so that RM doesn't need to manually rename files for
distribution
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/Makefile.vc
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Oct 22 06:37:27 2010
New Revision: 1026223
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026223view=rev
Log:
Use version suffix so that RM doesn't need to manually rename files for
distribution
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/Makefile.amd64
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Oct 22 06:44:06 2010
New Revision: 1026224
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026224view=rev
Log:
Use version suffix so that RM doesn't need to manually rename files for
distribution
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/netscape/Makefile.vc
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50140
--- Comment #2 from Michael Hopf m...@3ds.com 2010-10-22 03:20:39 EDT ---
Version 6.0.29 has the same problem. We are using a 64bit Windows 2008
Enterprise system. If you are sure that the problem is NSIS related, we can
close this bug
On 22.10.2010 08:35, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Oct 22 06:35:25 2010
New Revision: 1026222
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026222view=rev
Log:
Use version suffix so that RM doesn't need to manually rename files for
distribution
Modified:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Oct 22 08:38:53 2010
New Revision: 1026244
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026244view=rev
Log:
Do not have fixed version strings in makefiles. Use command line option for
JK_VERSION and HTTPD_VERSION
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/Makefile.vc
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Oct 22 08:45:17 2010
New Revision: 1026246
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026246view=rev
Log:
Remove extra dash if just building mod_jk.so
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/Makefile.vc
Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/Makefile.vc
URL:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Fri Oct 22 08:46:27 2010
New Revision: 1026247
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026247view=rev
Log:
votes
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Oct 22 08:50:28 2010
New Revision: 1026249
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026249view=rev
Log:
JK_VERSION is part of jk_version.h file. Use SO_VERSION instead
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/Makefile.vc
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/Makefile.amd64
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Oct 22 09:05:28 2010
New Revision: 1026257
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026257view=rev
Log:
Dry run went well so tag 1.2.31 RC1. If voted this tag will be renamed to
JK_1_2_31
Added:
tomcat/jk/tags/JK_1_2_31_RC1/
- copied from r1026256,
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Oct 22 11:05:46 2010
New Revision: 1026294
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026294view=rev
Log:
fix typo
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/netscape/jk_nsapi_plugin.c
Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/native/netscape/jk_nsapi_plugin.c
URL:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Oct 22 11:09:30 2010
New Revision: 1026296
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026296view=rev
Log:
Tag 1.2.31 RC2 because of nsapi typo. If voted this tag will be renamed to
JK_1_2_31
Added:
tomcat/jk/tags/JK_1_2_31_RC2/
- copied from r1026295,
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Oct 22 11:10:10 2010
New Revision: 1026297
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026297view=rev
Log:
Remove faulty tag
Removed:
tomcat/jk/tags/JK_1_2_31_RC1/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Cool. Some notes ...
(1) Since we already have
- effectiveMajorVersion
- effectiveMinorVersion
Is Context.version a good name to use? Since the name version is also
used by the servlet spec? Would revision be a less confusing name? (Or
webappRevision).
(2)
[I thought of this as a side
On 22/10/2010 06:27, Tim Funk wrote:
(1) Since we already have
- effectiveMajorVersion
- effectiveMinorVersion
Is Context.version a good name to use? Since the name version is also
used by the servlet spec? Would revision be a less confusing name? (Or
webappRevision).
Good point. Maybe
Author: markt
Date: Fri Oct 22 11:44:03 2010
New Revision: 1026305
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026305view=rev
Log:
Update for 7.0.4 release
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-70.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/oldnews.html
On 22.10.2010 13:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/10/2010 06:27, Tim Funk wrote:
(1) Since we already have
- effectiveMajorVersion
- effectiveMinorVersion
Is Context.version a good name to use? Since the name version is also
used by the servlet spec? Would revision be a less confusing name? (Or
On 22/10/2010 06:55, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 22.10.2010 13:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/10/2010 06:27, Tim Funk wrote:
(1) Since we already have
- effectiveMajorVersion
- effectiveMinorVersion
Is Context.version a good name to use? Since the name version is also
used by the servlet spec?
Hello,
I was playing around with zero downtime releases since 2003 and I
think there are some pitfalls in your approach I dont see yet solved.
I'm taking as premise that you are targeting 'larger' sites, meaning
loadbalancers, 4++ servers etc. Small sites don't really need this
feature imho (the
A bit of opinion from my side:
On 22.10.2010 14:28, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
1. ressources - for the time you have both versions in parallel you'll
have double resources need, double amount of db connections, double
amount of memory etc.
This means that the hosting has to sized accordingly, but
On 22/10/2010 13:28, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
Hello,
I was playing around with zero downtime releases since 2003 and I
This isn't zero downtime. Tomcat already does that and has done for
quite a while. This handles the case where sessions from version n can't
migrate to version n+1 - e.g. to an
Hi,
1.2.31 release proposal based on the JK_1_2_31_RC2 tag
is available for testing at:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat-connectors/jk/
Beside sources there is assorted set of binaries
for your convenience. Just browse down the binaries
directory and you might get lucky :)
Documentation
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 22/10/2010 13:28, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
Hello,
I was playing around with zero downtime releases since 2003 and I
This isn't zero downtime. Tomcat already does that and has done for
quite a while. This handles the case
On 10/21/2010 08:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
- decide once we can see the patch without the clean-up if it is safe
for 7.0.x or needs to be held back for 7.1.x
If it doesn't break things or existing users configs,
I have no problem of having it in 7.0.
Adding 7.1 to the list would just confuse
On 10/22/2010 7:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/10/2010 06:27, Tim Funk wrote:
(1) Since we already have
- effectiveMajorVersion
- effectiveMinorVersion
Is Context.version a good name to use? Since the name version is also
used by the servlet spec? Would revision be a less confusing name? (Or
On 22/10/2010 14:15, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
Well the primary resource I see as a problem is heap. I have one
customer who runs his tomcats with 12gb heap and another with 8. Both
do that on 16 gb machines. They couldn't increase without resizing the
machines.
The heap is really used and not
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
--- Comment #1 from bsny...@apache.org 2010-10-22 09:57:37 EDT ---
Here's the description that I copy/pasted from the Spring forums:
In Websphere I was able to wire an interceptor around all of my controllers and
set thread-bound DB
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 7.0.4 beta.
Apache Tomcat 7.0 includes new features over Apache Tomcat 6.0,
including support for the new Servlet 3.0, JSP 2.2 and EL 2.2
specifications, web application memory leak detection and prevention,
improved
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
--- Comment #2 from bsny...@apache.org 2010-10-22 10:25:43 EDT ---
Do you have a code example to show how you receive this error? Or perhaps even
a JUnit test?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
--- Comment #3 from Tim t...@cornell.edu 2010-10-22 10:29:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Do you have a code example to show how you receive this error? Or perhaps even
a JUnit test?
Take a look at the source code for getConnection.
On 22.10.2010 15:10, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
1.2.31 release proposal based on the JK_1_2_31_RC2 tag
is available for testing at:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat-connectors/jk/
Beside sources there is assorted set of binaries
for your convenience. Just browse down the binaries
directory
On 10/22/2010 05:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 22.10.2010 15:10, Mladen Turk wrote:
Since nsapi is so rare and I assume only Solaris is hit by the problem, I
wouldn't say it's a showstopper. We can open a bugzilla to document and fix
next time. What do you think?
+1
That's how I build them
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50143
Summary: jstl 1.2 el in tag files is not interpreted correctly
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.29
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Tomcat Wiki for change
notification.
The SupportAndTraining page has been changed by Savoir-faire Linux.
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/SupportAndTraining?action=diffrev1=23rev2=24
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Tomcat Wiki for change
notification.
The SupportAndTraining page has been changed by Savoir-faire Linux.
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/SupportAndTraining?action=diffrev1=24rev2=25
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Tomcat Wiki for change
notification.
The SupportAndTraining page has been changed by Savoir-faire Linux.
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/SupportAndTraining?action=diffrev1=25rev2=26
Author: kkolinko
Date: Fri Oct 22 21:15:03 2010
New Revision: 1026496
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026496view=rev
Log:
correct typos
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Fri Oct 22 21:19:52 2010
New Revision: 1026498
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026498view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Fri Oct 22 21:59:51 2010
New Revision: 1026506
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026506view=rev
Log:
Revert part of r1026157
Removing throwa NamingException from parseName() methods as was done in
r1026157 changed their API,
so that derived classes won't be able to
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Tomcat Wiki for change
notification.
The SupportAndTraining page has been changed by KonstantinKolinko.
The comment on this change is: As is written on the page, new entries must be
added to the end of the list. (a
How can you create a filter for bugs that are fixed in trunk, proposed to be
fixed in tomcat 6, and waiting to be backported ? Do you use some special bug
attribute ?
Sylvain
PS : Why not use JIRA ? It has many advantages over this aging bugzilla...
2010/10/23 Sylvain Laurent sylvain.laur...@m4x.org:
How can you create a filter for bugs that are fixed in trunk, proposed to be
fixed in tomcat 6, and waiting to be backported ? Do you use some special bug
attribute ?
What do you mean?
If it is already fixed in TC7, we change the product
2010/10/16 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com:
2010/10/16 Tim Whittington t...@apache.org:
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/javax/el/BeanELResolver.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/ExpressionBuilder.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/util/ConcurrentCache.java
Modified:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Fri Oct 22 23:57:07 2010
New Revision: 1026535
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026535view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
Not to step on anyones toes, but JIRA costs serious $$ after the initial 10
users. It gets expensive fast. Trac is good too though. I set up an
awesome Trac system at work.
- Josh
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Sylvain Laurent sylvain.laur...@m4x.orgwrote:
How can you create a filter for
They could be comfortable with Bugzilla too. I see JIRA has an open source
license. (back pedal back pedal!!!)
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Josh Gooding josh.good...@gmail.comwrote:
Not to step on anyones toes, but JIRA costs serious $$ after the initial 10
users. It gets expensive
Hi guys,
I had a bug starting tomcat6 with (commons-daemon). The problem was that
common-daemons was not able to register native methods (with
commons-daemon.jar). Digging into the problem made me find that the file
commons-daemon.jar distributed in
47 matches
Mail list logo
