[GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-trunk-test (in module tomcat-trunk) failed

2012-02-19 Thread Bill Barker
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project tomcat-trunk-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

Re: WebSocket progress report

2012-02-19 Thread Petr Praus
Hi Mark, I noticed you wrote a websocket test client, I haven't looked at it extensively but I wanted to ask - have you considered using Autobahn for testing? It's rather extensive opensource websocket testing suite. It already contains a lot of stuff we need to test including fragmentation testing

Re: AccessLogValve enhancement

2012-02-19 Thread Mark Claassen
My initial motivation for doing this was in trying to figure out a way to have the logs automatically delete old ones eventually. I couldn't find a way to do it, looked at the source, and got a bit sidetracked. The rest is history On Feb 19, 2012 12:50 PM, "Mark Thomas" wrote: > -BEGIN PGP

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51197] sendError/sendRedirect don't work with AsyncContext

2012-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 --- Comment #6 from Konstantin Kolinko 2012-02-20 01:21:48 UTC --- Created attachment 28356 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28356 test.war - Reproducer for issue in Comment 3 WAR that reproduces the issue. [[[

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51197] sendError/sendRedirect don't work with AsyncContext

2012-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|F

Re: AccessLogValve enhancement

2012-02-19 Thread Mark Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19/02/2012 17:20, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Mark, > > On 2/15/12 4:33 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> I also be +1 to considering making this the sole way >> AccessLogValve logging may be output. > > The only possible reason why we wouldn't want to d

Re: AccessLogValve enhancement

2012-02-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mark, On 2/15/12 4:33 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > I also be +1 to considering making this the sole way AccessLogValve > logging may be output. The only possible reason why we wouldn't want to do this is that lots of users simply cannot figure out how to configure the loggers. Yes, it's really not al

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets

2012-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #39 from Mark Thomas 2012-02-19 16:35:14 UTC --- Short update for folks not following the dev list. - added fragmented packet support - added *very* basic test client -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/us