[Bug 56148] support (multiple) ocsp stapling

2014-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1

new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hello seems now parent classloader used to avoid to overwrite classes is j2seClassLoader which is extclassloader by default. This totally breaks tomee and i guess other apps since classes which were not overwritten in standalone (new Tomcat) are now overwritten by webapp classloader. Is it

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
PS: BTW system varaible is no more used in new code Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-18 10:21 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hello

[Bug 56137] Change HTTPS connector example (protocol attribute) from HTTP/1.1 to Http11NioProtocol

2014-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56137 Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug 55943] Provide a way prevent looking at the System classloader before the webapp classloaders

2014-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55943 --- Comment #8 from romain.manni-bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com --- Hi this totaally breaks tomcat and tomee usage in embeded mode (+ has a lot of side effect in normal mode). 1) the j2seClassLoader is not overridable in children classloader

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/02/2014 09:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hello seems now parent classloader used to avoid to overwrite classes is j2seClassLoader which is extclassloader by default. This totally breaks tomee and i guess other apps since classes which were not overwritten in standalone (new Tomcat)

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
We did it but it doesn't cover the embedded case at all since you want to use system classloader. I know this is a case tomcat doesn't handle but it breaks applications using it before (new Tomcat() too). Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn:

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Please don't top post. On 18/02/2014 09:59, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: We did it but Did what? it doesn't cover the embedded case at all What doesn't? Why? since you want to use system classloader. What do you want to use that class loader for? I know this is a case tomcat doesn't handle

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-02-18 11:04 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: Please don't top post. On 18/02/2014 09:59, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: We did it but Did what? used filter() it doesn't cover the embedded case at all What doesn't? Why? In embedded case you deploy an app with your classes in the

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/02/2014 10:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 11:04 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 09:59, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: snip/ it doesn't cover the embedded case at all What doesn't? Why? In embedded case you deploy an app with your classes in the JVM and

async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi async-supportedfalse/async-supported is no more supported by default int tomcat for filter? it is used in tcks and seems broken now Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github:

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
let say we have an interface Foo. I deploy a war with Foo and FooImpl. In the since I'm in embedded mode I can get FooImpl casting it to Foo. Foo has been loaded from the Junit JVM for instance and FooImpl from the webapp cause we use a framework (spring, CDI, ...). The cast will fail cause

Re: async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
edit: org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspConfig#processWebDotXml validates the xml immediately and doesn't read the version from WebXml - from ContextConfig with getMajorVersion, getMinorVersion methods Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn:

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Again, please stop top posting. On 18/02/2014 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: let say we have an interface Foo. I deploy a war with Foo and FooImpl. In the since I'm in embedded mode I can get FooImpl casting it to Foo. Foo has been loaded from the Junit JVM for instance and FooImpl from the

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-02-18 11:44 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: Again, please stop top posting. On 18/02/2014 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: let say we have an interface Foo. I deploy a war with Foo and FooImpl. In the since I'm in embedded mode I can get FooImpl casting it to Foo. Foo has been

Re: async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Yet again, please don't top post. On 18/02/2014 10:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: edit: org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspConfig#processWebDotXml validates the xml immediately and doesn't read the version from WebXml - from ContextConfig with getMajorVersion, getMinorVersion methods Which Tomcat

Re: async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-02-18 11:54 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: Yet again, please don't top post. On 18/02/2014 10:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: edit: org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspConfig#processWebDotXml validates the xml immediately and doesn't read the version from WebXml - from ContextConfig

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/02/2014 10:50, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 11:44 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: snip/ It was working fine before and it was convenient. By default you don't add jars in tomcat system loader so the behavior of tomcat was

Re: async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/02/2014 11:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 11:54 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: Yet again, please don't top post. On 18/02/2014 10:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: edit: org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspConfig#processWebDotXml validates the xml immediately and doesn't read

Re: async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-02-18 12:15 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 11:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 11:54 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: Yet again, please don't top post. On 18/02/2014 10:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: edit:

Re: async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/02/2014 12:01, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 12:15 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 11:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: snip/ I got it from JspConfig: Got what from JspConfig? the previous stack: INFO: htmlheadtitleApache Tomcat (TomEE)/7.0.52

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 10:50, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 11:44 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: snip/ It was working fine before and it was convenient. By default you don't add

Re: async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-02-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 12:01, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 12:15 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 11:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: snip/ I got it from JspConfig: Got what from JspConfig? the previous stack:

[jira] [Updated] (MTOMCAT-238) Parameter staticContextDocbase cant be used

2014-02-18 Thread Laurent GARCIA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Laurent GARCIA updated MTOMCAT-238: --- Attachment: tomcat7-maven-plugin-2.2.jar.zip Version patchée Parameter

[jira] [Comment Edited] (MTOMCAT-238) Parameter staticContextDocbase cant be used

2014-02-18 Thread Laurent GARCIA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13904147#comment-13904147 ] Laurent GARCIA edited comment on MTOMCAT-238 at 2/18/14 3:30 PM:

svn commit: r1569398 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader: LocalStrings.properties WebappClassLoader.java

2014-02-18 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 18 16:00:34 2014 New Revision: 1569398 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1569398 Log: Make it easier for TomEE to modify the j2seClassLoader Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/LocalStrings.properties

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: snip/ We can certainly make that easier. Making it non-final, using an over-ridable protected getter(), adding protected getter and setter etc. Does TomEE have a preference? not really

Re: async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/02/2014 13:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: snip/ Looks like there might be a couple of problems here. Any chance you could debug this and provide the full text of the merged web.xml?

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-02-18 17:01 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: snip/ We can certainly make that easier. Making it non-final, using an over-ridable protected getter(), adding protected getter

Re: async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-02-18 17:05 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 13:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: snip/ Looks like there might be a couple of problems here. Any chance you could debug this and provide the full text of the merged

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/02/2014 16:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 17:01 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: snip/ We can certainly make that easier. Making it non-final, using an

Re: async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/02/2014 16:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 17:05 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 13:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: snip/ Looks like there might be a couple of problems here. Any chance you could

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Thanks in all case, think we can close the debate now ;) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-18 17:18 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2014-02-18 20:01 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: snip/ We can certainly make that easier. Making it non-final, using an over-ridable protected getter(), adding protected getter

Re: async-supportedfalse/async-supported in filter?

2014-02-18 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2014-02-18 20:05 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 13:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: snip/ Looks like there might be a couple of problems here. Any chance you could debug this and provide the full text of the merged

Re: new classloader parent?

2014-02-18 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-02-18 18:49 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com: 2014-02-18 20:01 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: snip/ We can certainly make that easier. Making it

svn commit: r1569459 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader: LocalStrings.properties WebappClassLoader.java

2014-02-18 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 18 18:19:18 2014 New Revision: 1569459 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1569459 Log: s/j2se/javase/ Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/LocalStrings.properties tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/WebappClassLoader.java Modified:

svn commit: r1569461 - /tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2014-02-18 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 18 18:22:51 2014 New Revision: 1569461 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1569461 Log: Update Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml URL:

svn commit: r1569465 - in /tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk: ./ java/org/apache/catalina/loader/LocalStrings.properties java/org/apache/catalina/loader/WebappClassLoader.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2014-02-18 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 18 18:29:11 2014 New Revision: 1569465 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1569465 Log: Make it easier for TomEE to modify the j2seClassLoader Modified: tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)

[jira] [Commented] (MTOMCAT-238) Parameter staticContextDocbase cant be used

2014-02-18 Thread *$^¨%`£
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13904680#comment-13904680 ] Olivier Lamy (*$^¨%`£) commented on MTOMCAT-238: [~lgarcia] If you want

[Bug 55837] ServletContext.getRealPath() returns null

2014-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55837 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Mi patrick...@touchpoint.co.nz --- Should the method return the CanonicalPath or AbsolutePath? I used this method in Tomcat 4 and it returned AbsolutePath and now I found that it returns CanonicalPath which