https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
--- Comment #14 from Matthew de Detrich ---
I agree that this is something that should be able to be implemented without
having to edit application code, particularly if it prevents the issues
regarding ordering that Konstantin Kolinko ment
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667
--- Comment #3 from Martin Knoblauch ---
Hi Rainer,
thanks. Sorry for the stupid question: how can I check out the current source
for mod_jk? Likely a FAQ, I know ...
Martin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Jung ---
The sources are in subversion, so it would be
svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/jk/trunk
The mod_jk sources are in the sub directory "native".
Now since this is native code, autotools
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667
--- Comment #5 from Martin Knoblauch ---
Hi Rainer,
just found out myself. Should have asked earlier :-)
Sure, I am aware that this is a development snapshot. I will use it with utmost
care.
Thanks
Martin
--
You are receiving this mai
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 24 10:57:26 2014
New Revision: 1613066
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1613066
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53198
driverClassName should not be mandatory
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53198
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/mo
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 24 13:17:46 2014
New Revision: 1613111
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1613111
Log:
Make tests pass by properly using the mock objects and not rely on a pre
existing table.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/test/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/TestSlowQu
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 24 13:18:06 2014
New Revision: 1613112
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1613112
Log:
Code depends on DBCP2 from Tomcat
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/pom.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/mod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14073182#comment-14073182
]
Manuel Pereira González commented on MTOMCAT-128:
-
Hello, we are in the s
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 24 13:42:38 2014
New Revision: 1613123
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1613123
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53367
Properly handle interrupts in the FairBlockingQueue
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53367
Added:
tomca
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53198
Filip Hanik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53367
--- Comment #13 from Filip Hanik ---
Fixed in trunk at r1613123
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 24 13:50:23 2014
New Revision: 1613135
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1613135
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53367
Assume error until proven otherwise
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/Fai
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 24 14:00:38 2014
New Revision: 1613137
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1613137
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53367
Fix interrupt handling in the FairBlockingQueue
Added:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/test/java/org/apache/tom
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/279
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53367
Filip Hanik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53367
--- Comment #15 from Filip Hanik ---
Flag correction in trunk r1613135
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/280
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source Sta
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-7-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-7-trunk/builds/192
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
Bug ID: 56770
Summary: Add worker name to logging entries
Product: Tomcat Connectors
Version: 1.2.40
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: en
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
--- Comment #2 from Martin Knoblauch ---
Created attachment 31847
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31847&action=edit
Patched source file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
--- Comment #1 from Martin Knoblauch ---
Created attachment 31846
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31846&action=edit
Patrch to add worker name
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
Victor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56764
--- Comment #2 from rstoyanc...@yahoo.com ---
Is the order respected?
They appear to be stored in a HashMap:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java#L398
--
You are receiving this mai
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56586
--- Comment #5 from Wes Clark ---
I agree with the filer. Alternately, turn on autocommit when running the
initialization SQL, then if configured to be off, turn it back off.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
--- Comment #19 from Kevin J Walters ---
My general conclusion in this area is anything that's effectively doing rpc
should be using some sort of id to match requests and responses and allow the
client to discard/warn/retry on mismatches. T
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56764
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47714
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Reponse mixed between users |Response mixed between
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
Is there a reason you moved the call to ajp_update_stats from after the log to
before it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31846|Patrch to add worker name |Patch to add worker name
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31847|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56764
--- Comment #4 from rstoyanc...@yahoo.com ---
I am guilty of taking a shortcut. Apologies for the noise.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
Hi guys,
just started to play with tomcat 8 and seems default log format changed
(inline now)
This doesn't seem that readable for me out of the box and wonder if we
couldn't enhance default logging format to get a shorter and ligned log
format (xx-yy-zz aa:bb [thread name on 15 chars max] [ class
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56586
--- Comment #6 from Filip Hanik ---
Thanks for the report gentlemen. Glad there is a workaround, the added
";commit".
If it did do
if ( !connection.getAutoCommit() ) connection.commit();
what are the implications for other users?
--
Y
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56586
--- Comment #7 from Craig Servin ---
I can't think of any issues with that unless someone was intentionally trying
to lose their initSQL later on.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
--- Comment #5 from Martin Knoblauch ---
Hi Christopher,
you are talking about this hunk?
@@ -2704,13 +2726,13 @@
*/
ajp_next_connection(p, l);
}
+ajp_update_stats(e, aw, rc, l);
/* Log the error only onc
35 matches
Mail list logo
