+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Author: markt
Date: Sun Jun 14 16:35:14 2015
New Revision: 1685421
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1685421
Log:
Ensure that stream 17 is processed in preference to 19 and 21 else the
assumptions for the rest of the test are not valid.
Modified:
Hi,
The netty-tcnative is based on the 1.1.x so the porting taking more than
excepted.
I would like some comments on the class caching for performances like in
ssl.c:
+++
TCN_FREE_CSTRING(engine);
+
+/* Cache the byte[].class for performance reasons */
+clazz = (*e)-FindClass(e,
10 matches
Mail list logo