To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc8.0.x-test-apr has an issue affecting its community
integration.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57830
SATOH Fumiyasu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fumiyas-u-apa...@sfo.jp
--
You are r
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/06/2016 21:52, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> I'm wondering if this is a problem that builds up over time. If I
>>> understood your previous posts correctly, running the big tests
>>> immediately gave ~700MB/s whereas running the s
Nate,
On 6/24/16 10:40 AM, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see
>>> similar results and, assuming I do, I'll st
On 24/06/2016 21:52, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I'm wondering if this is a problem that builds up over time. If I
>> understood your previous posts correctly, running the big tests
>> immediately gave ~700MB/s whereas running the small tests then the big
>> tests resulting in ~350MB/s duri
Mark,
On 6/22/16 9:06 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/06/2016 14:01, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Am 22.06.2016 um 13:20 schrieb Mark Thomas:
>>> A while ago I observed unexpected APR_EGENERAL errors being returned
>>> when performing SSL reads. I was unable to identify the root cause but I
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:52 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 24/06/2016 20:01, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 24/06/2016 18:41, Nate Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Nate C
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/06/2016 20:01, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 24/06/2016 18:41, Nate Clark wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Nate Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:27
On 24/06/2016 20:01, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 24/06/2016 18:41, Nate Clark wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Nate Clark wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/06/2016 18:25, Mark Tho
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/06/2016 18:41, Nate Clark wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Nate Clark wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 24/06/2016 18:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Can you provide the settings you are
On 24/06/2016 18:41, Nate Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Nate Clark wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 24/06/2016 18:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
Can you provide the settings you are using for the Executor as well please?
>>
>> >
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Nate Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 24/06/2016 18:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you provide the settings you are using for the Executor as well please?
>
> maxThreads="500" minSpareThreads="4"/>
>
>>
>> A
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/06/2016 18:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Can you provide the settings you are using for the Executor as well please?
>
> And how long do the initial 5,000,000 4k requests take to process?
>
40 minutes.
-nate
-
On 24/06/2016 18:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/06/2016 18:11, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 24/06/2016 11:17, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
> Thanks.
>
> I'm going to start some
On 24/06/2016 18:11, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 24/06/2016 11:17, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>>>
Thanks.
I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/06/2016 11:17, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see
>>> similar results and, assuming I do, I'll start looking at fixi
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see
>> similar results and, assuming I do, I'll start looking at fixing this
>> for 1.2.x/9.0.x and back-porting.
>>
>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:37 AM, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 24/06/2016 11:17, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>>>
Thanks.
I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see
similar re
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/06/2016 11:17, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see
>>> similar results and, assuming I do, I'll start looking at fixi
On 24/06/2016 15:40, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see
>>> similar results and, assuming I do, I'll start loo
On 24/06/2016 11:17, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see
>> similar results and, assuming I do, I'll start looking at fixing this
>> for 1.2.x/9.0.x and back-porting.
>>
> Hum, the fi
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see
>> similar results and, assuming I do, I'll start looking at fixing this
>> for 1.2.x/9.0.x and back-porting.
>>
>
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59752
Bug ID: 59752
Summary: Migration guide issues
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Prior
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57665
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Fussenegger ---
The patch adds support for a hostHeader that works analogue to the existing
portHeader. It's disabled by default, keeping backward compatibility. Setting
it to a value like X-Forwarded-Host will overri
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57665
Stefan Fussenegger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@molindo.at
--- Comment #3 fr
2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
> Thanks.
>
> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see
> similar results and, assuming I do, I'll start looking at fixing this
> for 1.2.x/9.0.x and back-porting.
>
> Hum, the fix that was submitted doesn't make sense IMO since wri
On 23/06/2016 22:31, Nate Clark wrote:
> I tried to submit the bug but it seems that I am now unable to access
> bz.apache.org. Since you made it seem like it was important for this
> to be known about here is the info and patches.
Thanks. I'll chat with the infra folks and see if I can get whatev
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-8-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-8-trunk/builds/666
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sch
Author: markt
Date: Fri Jun 24 09:36:54 2016
New Revision: 1750059
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1750059&view=rev
Log:
Follow-up to BZ 59399. Document NullRealm and transportGuaranteeRedirectStatus
for all Realms.
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc7.0.x/t
Author: markt
Date: Fri Jun 24 09:34:50 2016
New Revision: 1750058
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1750058&view=rev
Log:
Follow-up to BZ 59399. Document NullRealm and transportGuaranteeRedirectStatus
for all Realms.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc8.0.x/t
Author: markt
Date: Fri Jun 24 09:34:28 2016
New Revision: 1750057
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1750057&view=rev
Log:
Follow-up to BZ 59399. Document NullRealm and transportGuaranteeRedirectStatus
for all Realms.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc8.5.x/t
Author: markt
Date: Fri Jun 24 09:29:11 2016
New Revision: 1750056
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1750056&view=rev
Log:
Follow-up to BZ 59399. Document NullRealm and transportGuaranteeRedirectStatus
for all Realms.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
tomcat/trunk/web
32 matches
Mail list logo
