Re: JASPIC Specification info missing from a few places

2016-12-21 Thread Coty Sutherland
> Is there a space there? I'm assuming not since none of the others have > one. If it does, we'll need to figure out how to handle that. That was my fault; I fixed it and am able to edit. > You should be able to add components now. I just updated the description. Should I also add a component fo

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "Specifications" by CotySutherland

2016-12-21 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The "Specifications" page has been changed by CotySutherland: https://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/Specifications?action=diff&rev1=42&rev2=43 Comment: Adding missing JASPIC section as it was

Re: JASPIC Specification info missing from a few places

2016-12-21 Thread Mark Thomas
On 21/12/2016 20:15, Coty Sutherland wrote: >> Yes. We need you MoinMoin ID for the Tomcat wiki. > > Ah. OK, I created an account for the wiki (I didn't see the sign up > link before). It's "Coty Sutherland", if you need that. Is there a space there? I'm assuming not since none of the others have

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "AdminGroup" by markt

2016-12-21 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The "AdminGroup" page has been changed by markt: https://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/AdminGroup?action=diff&rev1=11&rev2=12 Comment: += Coty Sutherland * VioletaGeorgieva * JeanFreder

Re: JASPIC Specification info missing from a few places

2016-12-21 Thread Coty Sutherland
> Yes. We need you MoinMoin ID for the Tomcat wiki. Ah. OK, I created an account for the wiki (I didn't see the sign up link before). It's "Coty Sutherland", if you need that. > BZ account name? I'll add you as an admin Awesome, thanks. It's `csuth...@redhat.com`. --

Re: JASPIC Specification info missing from a few places

2016-12-21 Thread Mark Thomas
On 21/12/2016 19:33, Coty Sutherland wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been looking at the specifications listings on the > whichversions.html page and noticed JASPIC was missing, but is > implemented in 8.5+. I've added it on the site, but then I noticed > that it's also missing from the specifications p

JASPIC Specification info missing from a few places

2016-12-21 Thread Coty Sutherland
Hi all, I've been looking at the specifications listings on the whichversions.html page and noticed JASPIC was missing, but is implemented in 8.5+. I've added it on the site, but then I noticed that it's also missing from the specifications page here: https://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/Specifications.

Re: svn commit: r1775535 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.html

2016-12-21 Thread Mark Thomas
On 21/12/2016 19:06, csuth...@apache.org wrote: > Author: csutherl > Date: Wed Dec 21 19:06:02 2016 > New Revision: 1775535 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1775535&view=rev > Log: > Reverting change for EE reference, 8 was right Thanks. Mark > > Modified: > tomcat/site/trunk/doc

svn commit: r1775535 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.html

2016-12-21 Thread csutherl
Author: csutherl Date: Wed Dec 21 19:06:02 2016 New Revision: 1775535 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1775535&view=rev Log: Reverting change for EE reference, 8 was right Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.html Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.html URL: http://

Re: svn commit: r1775523 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.html

2016-12-21 Thread Coty Sutherland
> That reference is correct. Tomcat 9 implements specs from Java EE 8. Ah, I'll fix it. Sorry. On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 21/12/2016 18:18, csuth...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: csutherl >> Date: Wed Dec 21 18:18:32 2016 >> New Revision: 1775523 >> >> URL: http://sv

Re: svn commit: r1775523 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.html

2016-12-21 Thread Mark Thomas
On 21/12/2016 18:18, csuth...@apache.org wrote: > Author: csutherl > Date: Wed Dec 21 18:18:32 2016 > New Revision: 1775523 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1775523&view=rev > Log: > Added missing JASPIC spec implementation note for tomcat 9.0 and updated an > incorrect reference to Java

svn commit: r1775524 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.html

2016-12-21 Thread csutherl
Author: csutherl Date: Wed Dec 21 18:21:52 2016 New Revision: 1775524 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1775524&view=rev Log: Updating instances of 'Web Socket' to remove the space and correctly state 'WebSocket' which is consistent with the table at the top of this page and the spec Modifi

svn commit: r1775523 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.html

2016-12-21 Thread csutherl
Author: csutherl Date: Wed Dec 21 18:18:32 2016 New Revision: 1775523 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1775523&view=rev Log: Added missing JASPIC spec implementation note for tomcat 9.0 and updated an incorrect reference to Java EE 8. Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.html

svn commit: r1775522 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.html

2016-12-21 Thread csutherl
Author: csutherl Date: Wed Dec 21 18:14:56 2016 New Revision: 1775522 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1775522&view=rev Log: Adding missing JASPIC spec implementation note for tomcat 8.5 Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.html Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/whichversion.htm

[Bug 60497] JSP custom tags returned to the tag pools to be reused without executing the doEndTag method

2016-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60497 Remy Maucherat changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #34540|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 60497] JSP custom tags returned to the tag pools to be reused without executing the doEndTag method

2016-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60497 --- Comment #7 from Wai-Kau Lo --- Created attachment 34543 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34543&action=edit Test web application Attached is a self-contained web application that can be used to replicate the issue. Af