[Bug 60362] Missing reason phrase in response

2017-01-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60362 --- Comment #19 from Ken DeLong --- And mine are in consumer electronic devices... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe,

[Bug 60362] Missing reason phrase in response

2017-01-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60362 --- Comment #18 from Todd Pierce --- (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #15) > The only good place to put all these non upgradeable IoT devices is the > trash. In my case the devices are head units inside cars. A bit expensive to throw i

[Bug 60362] Missing reason phrase in response

2017-01-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60362 --- Comment #17 from Josh Soref --- These devices should be behind a firewall/proxy (to protect them from the scary Internet). Your firewall/proxy can manage the 200 OK fix for you. That way if you upgrade to Tomcat 9, you'll still be ok. --

Re: HTTP response reason phrases

2017-01-29 Thread Josh Soref
Rainer Jung wrote: > the old spec states "The Reason-Phrase is intended to give a short textual > description of the Status-Code. > The ... Reason-Phrase is intended for the human user." "human user" should be a pretty big clue that a UA should not be using it to make any decisions. Any UA that ma