[Bug 63514] New: Tomcat 8.0.23 crash (tcnative-1.dll+0x7e75)

2019-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514 Bug ID: 63514 Summary: Tomcat 8.0.23 crash (tcnative-1.dll+0x7e75) Product: Tomcat Native Version: 1.1.33 Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority

[Bug 50025] getConnection method in class DataSourceProxy is ignoring credentials

2019-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025 --- Comment #8 from Randy Bonnette --- Here're the parameters: https://arcgis.env.nm.gov/docs/api/index.html?org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/DataSourceProxy.html https://writemyessaytoday.net/write-my-essay-in-2-hours I used Spring Boot 1.5.4 and h

[Bug 63505] enhancement - support of stored procedures for DataSourceRealm authentication

2019-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63505 --- Comment #3 from Eugène Adell --- The first one retrieves the user's password, the second the user's roles. Better ideas to names these attributes are of course welcome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

Re: Tomcat-Native - Time to move to git?

2019-06-17 Thread Igal Sapir
On 6/17/2019 2:18 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 17.06.2019 um 18:56 schrieb Mark Thomas: Hi, I'm starting to look at OCSP stapling for our OpenSSL based connectors and I suspect a Tomcat Native release will be required. Even if it isn't for this, it has been a while since the last Tomcat Native rel

[Bug 63505] enhancement - support of stored procedures for DataSourceRealm authentication

2019-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63505 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz --- What are userProcStoc and roleProcStoc abbreviations for? Those names look weird. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --

Re: Tomcat-Native - Time to move to git?

2019-06-17 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 17.06.2019 um 18:56 schrieb Mark Thomas: Hi, I'm starting to look at OCSP stapling for our OpenSSL based connectors and I suspect a Tomcat Native release will be required. Even if it isn't for this, it has been a while since the last Tomcat Native release so I expect we'll need to do one fair

[Bug 63500] Core dump using APR tomcat native with certificateRevocationListFile

2019-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63500 --- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas --- The stack trace suggests the fix for bug 62094 was incorrect. Looking at the trace, the proposed patch and the commit, I think the patch was not applied correctly. -- You are receiving this mail because: Y

[Bug 56148] support (multiple) ocsp stapling

2019-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148 --- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas --- This will need code changes in Tomcat Native. A rough outline of what is required is provided by: https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.0/man3/SSL_CTX_set_tlsext_status_arg.html -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Tomcat-Native - Time to move to git?

2019-06-17 Thread Coty Sutherland
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 12:56 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > I'm starting to look at OCSP stapling for our OpenSSL based connectors > and I suspect a Tomcat Native release will be required. Even if it isn't > for this, it has been a while since the last Tomcat Native release so I > expect we'll

Re: Tomcat-Native - Time to move to git?

2019-06-17 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 6:56 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > I'm starting to look at OCSP stapling for our OpenSSL based connectors > and I suspect a Tomcat Native release will be required. Even if it isn't > for this, it has been a while since the last Tomcat Native release so I > expect we'll n

Tomcat-Native - Time to move to git?

2019-06-17 Thread Mark Thomas
Hi, I'm starting to look at OCSP stapling for our OpenSSL based connectors and I suspect a Tomcat Native release will be required. Even if it isn't for this, it has been a while since the last Tomcat Native release so I expect we'll need to do one fairly soon anyway. The complication is the svn:e

[Bug 56148] support (multiple) ocsp stapling

2019-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148 --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas --- Just switching implementations (no config changes) NIO-OpenSSL - no stapling APR-OpenSSL - no stapling Next step is to look at OpenSSL config and API to see a) if this can be enabled and b) what the options

Re: CDI support improvements

2019-06-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le lun. 17 juin 2019 à 16:17, Rémy Maucherat a écrit : > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:52 AM Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > >> Hi Rémy, >> >> Great progression! Congrats! >> >> I have a few (details) notes - guess i'm opening an open door but just to >> ensure: >> >> 1. Is it intended to bind cxf to

Re: CDI support improvements

2019-06-17 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:52 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Rémy, > > Great progression! Congrats! > > I have a few (details) notes - guess i'm opening an open door but just to > ensure: > > 1. Is it intended to bind cxf to /rest/* in any case? I tend to see it > bound on on /api but generall

[Bug 56148] support (multiple) ocsp stapling

2019-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148 --- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas --- I can confirm this "just works" if you have a suitably configured certificate (LetsEncrypt in my test), a Java version that supports it (JDK 11.0.3+7 in my test), are using a JSSE based connector (NIO with JS

Re: JDK 13 enters Rampdown Phase One

2019-06-17 Thread Rory O'Donnell
Thanks Mark for the Update on both. Rgds,Rory On 17/06/2019 17:10, Mark Thomas wrote: Tomcat 9.0.x latest source ant clean test JDK-13-ea25 and JDK-14-ea01 complete without warnings or errors. Mark On 16/06/2019 07:00, Rory O'Donnell wrote: Hi Mark, *JDK 13 Early Access build **25 is now a

Re: JDK 13 enters Rampdown Phase One

2019-06-17 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 8:01 AM Rory O'Donnell wrote: > Hi Mark, > > *JDK 13 Early Access build **25 is now available **at : - > jdk.java.net/13/ * > > >- Per the JDK 13 schedule [1], we are now in Rampdown Phase One. > - For more details , see Mark Reinhold's e

Re: JDK 13 enters Rampdown Phase One

2019-06-17 Thread Mark Thomas
Tomcat 9.0.x latest source ant clean test JDK-13-ea25 and JDK-14-ea01 complete without warnings or errors. Mark On 16/06/2019 07:00, Rory O'Donnell wrote: > Hi Mark, > > *JDK 13 Early Access build **25 is now available **at : - jdk.java.net/13/* > > * Per the JDK 13 schedule [1], we are now

[CONF] Apache Tomcat > Apache Tomcat Home

2019-06-17 Thread Mark Thomas (Confluence)
Title: Message Title There's 1 new edit on this page   Apache Tomcat Home Mark Thomas edited this page Here's what changed:

Re: CDI support improvements

2019-06-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
PS/FYI: just noticed jetty did the same kind of work with weld 4 years ago: https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/blob/jetty-9.4.x/jetty-cdi/cdi-servlet/src/main/config/etc/jetty-cdi.xml, great Tomcat is catching up :). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog <

Re: CDI support improvements

2019-06-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Rémy, Great progression! Congrats! I have a few (details) notes - guess i'm opening an open door but just to ensure: 1. Is it intended to bind cxf to /rest/* in any case? I tend to see it bound on on /api but generally thanks to an Application (+ @ApplicationPath("api")) so cxf is bound on /*

Re: CDI support improvements

2019-06-17 Thread Rémy Maucherat
Hi Romain, On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 6:52 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/rt/frontend/jaxrs/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/jaxrs/utils/JAXRSUtils.java#L1412 > is likely the one but looks like johnzon was not scanned nor registered > programmatically > > May

Re: [Bug 63510] No

2019-06-17 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/06/2019 17:18, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63510 > > --- Comment #2 from Rainer Jung --- > Bugzilla is not a playground. > Stop this immediately or you will get blocked. I think you have more patience than me. I was going through this idiot's

[tomcat] branch master updated: Edit the Graal changelog to clarify

2019-06-17 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 5c5525e Edit the Graal changelog to clarify 5c552