[Bug 66420] New: Change in Tomcat 9.0.69 has caused regression issue with httpClient 4.5.13

2023-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66420 Bug ID: 66420 Summary: Change in Tomcat 9.0.69 has caused regression issue with httpClient 4.5.13 Product: Tomcat 9 Version: 9.0.69 Hardware: PC Status: NEW

Re: SecurityManager removal

2023-01-12 Thread Mark Thomas
On 12/01/2023 09:23, Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:12 AM Mark Thomas wrote: Hi all, As you will have seen I'm starting to work on removing references to the SecurityManager. Doing this has raised a couple of questions about related features. If there is no SecurityManager

Re: SecurityManager removal

2023-01-12 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:12 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > > Hi all, > > As you will have seen I'm starting to work on removing references to the > SecurityManager. Doing this has raised a couple of questions about > related features. > > If there is no SecurityManager then everything deployed to Tomca

SecurityManager removal

2023-01-12 Thread Mark Thomas
Hi all, As you will have seen I'm starting to work on removing references to the SecurityManager. Doing this has raised a couple of questions about related features. If there is no SecurityManager then everything deployed to Tomcat has to be assumed to be trusted. Or Tomcat has to be run in

[Bug 65635] Methods to return auth errors

2023-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65635 --- Comment #5 from Werner Daehn --- I had that sitting as enhancement for more than a year without a single comment. Not returning proper error messages could be considered a bug, especially when it is at something as important as security and

[Bug 66419] Function with varargs argument fails for single argument

2023-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419 kara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from kara...@gma

[GitHub] [tomcat] karacz opened a new pull request, #575: bug 66419

2023-01-12 Thread GitBox
karacz opened a new pull request, #575: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/575 Fix for the bug https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

Re: Tomcat 11 - minimum Java version

2023-01-12 Thread Mark Thomas
On 12/01/2023 08:35, Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:48 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Guess it was more about default java for linux distro, build is only reproducible if target --release flag is <= java distro version which will not be the case for java 21 soon enough probably

Re: Tomcat 11 - minimum Java version

2023-01-12 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:48 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Guess it was more about default java for linux distro, build is only > reproducible if target --release flag is <= java distro version which will > not be the case for java 21 soon enough probably, not really a build issue > by itself

[Bug 65635] Methods to return auth errors

2023-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65635 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|enhancement --- Comment #4 from Mark Tho

[Bug 66419] New: Function with varargs argument fails for single argument

2023-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419 Bug ID: 66419 Summary: Function with varargs argument fails for single argument Product: Tomcat 9 Version: 9.0.65 Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity:

[Bug 65635] Methods to return auth errors

2023-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65635 --- Comment #3 from Werner Daehn --- Meaning what? Did I enter the bug wrong? Do you feel that this is a user question and not a bug/limitation? I am not getting your point. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for t

[Bug 65635] Methods to return auth errors

2023-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65635 --- Comment #2 from Michael Osipov --- You want to go the users@ mailing list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-m

<    1   2