Smooth applications migration in a J2EE cluster [mod_jk]

2006-12-05 Thread Anthony Vromant
u are interested, we can provide further informations and source code. Would it be possible to integrate such a feature in the original mod_jk ? If yes, we may contribute to the development by providing our code. Anthony Vromant

Re: Smooth applications migration in a J2EE cluster [mod_jk]

2006-12-06 Thread Anthony Vromant
Rainer Jung wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Anthony Vromant wrote: Would it be possible to integrate such a feature in the original mod_jk ? If yes, we may contribute to the development by providing our code. There is no need to ask something like that. Just like for any other patch bring in

Re: Smooth applications migration in a J2EE cluster [mod_jk]

2006-12-08 Thread Anthony Vromant
couple of days to report problems early, before we tag the release. Again, all changes will be contained in the configuration reference guide. Regards, Rainer Anthony Vromant wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Anthony Vromant wrote: Would it be possible to integrate such a feat

Re: Smooth applications migration in a J2EE cluster [mod_jk]

2006-12-08 Thread Anthony Vromant
since I'm also very interested in seeing what you plain to do. Regards 2006/12/8, Anthony Vromant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Smooth applications migration in a J2EE cluster [mod_jk]

2006-12-15 Thread Anthony Vromant
n the JMX-Adaptor of Tomcat that mod_jk can invoke through the AJP interface. What's your opinion ? Thanks. Regards Anthony Vromant Anthony Vromant wrote: Hi Rainer, First of all, thank you for these informations. Here is the HTTP link for the Flash demonstration of our prototy

Re: Smooth applications migration in a J2EE cluster [mod_jk]

2006-12-19 Thread Anthony Vromant
Hi Rainer, Thanks for this explanations. I'm going to try to give you more technical informations. Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, yes I looked at the animation. Although I must confess, that I don't get much out of it technically. What's the reason for the need to test session validity? Is it needed

Re: Smooth applications migration in a J2EE cluster [mod_jk]

2006-12-19 Thread Anthony Vromant
ope with this miss. By the way, I've also tried to use routes with a period like 'domain.worker', but it changes nothing. Regards, Anthony Anthony Vromant wrote: Hi Rainer, Thanks for this explanations. I'm going to try to give you more technical informations. Rainer Ju

Re: Smooth applications migration in a J2EE cluster [mod_jk]

2006-12-20 Thread Anthony Vromant
? It would be a kind of transparent fail-over implemented by mod_jk. Regards, Anthony Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Anthony, Anthony Vromant schrieb: Here is the explanation about the session validity checking : This test aims to have users with expired sessions and URL encoded bookmarks (or long

Re: Smooth applications migration in a J2EE cluster [mod_jk]

2006-12-27 Thread Anthony Vromant
Hi Rainer, I wanted to know if you had had time to think on the subject of the invalidated session Valve ? Other informations that you gave us before were very useful. Thanks a lot. Regards, Anthony Anthony Vromant wrote: Hi Rainer, In my test case, i start only with 3 actives workers. So

Re: Smooth applications migration in a J2EE cluster [mod_jk]

2007-01-08 Thread Anthony Vromant
.sendRedirect(((HttpServletRequest) request) .getContextPath() + ((HttpServletRequest) request).getServletPath()); return; } Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Anthony, Anthony Vromant schrieb: Here is the explanation about the session