On 7/2/24 2:01 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] +1 Beta - go ahead and release as 11.0.0-M22
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 7/2/24 3:00 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.91
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi,
I looked to the page, wondering how to get a "new comer" to the cwiki...
That is not documented.
What is the process? Create a Apache JIRA user and user it?
If yes that should be in the wiki ;-)
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 5/3/24 22:37, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.89
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 4/23/24 14:47, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Frederic,
On 4/23/24 08:27, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/23/24 09:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples
On 4/23/24 14:44, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Frederic,
On 4/23/24 08:27, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/23/24 09:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples
On 4/23/24 09:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/04/2024 06:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples, did I miss something.
No idea. You'd need to do a diff to see what didn't match and that will
(hopefully
On 4/16/24 15:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.23
Tested on fedora39 with tc-native 2.0.7 looks OK, TCK passes.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 4/17/24 12:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
Build is reproducible.
My tests here complain about examples, did I miss something.
TCK tests are still running...
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 2/14/24 23:43, Christopher Schultz wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.19
Tested on fedora39, build reproduced and TCK passed.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 2/15/24 04:46, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
The spate of PRs (nearly) all at the same time, all with (nearly) the
same title and all with (nearly) the same apology appear to be linked.
I don't know what is going on but I have a very hard time believing that
they were all accidental. It looks
On 2/14/24 09:53, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.86
Tested on fedora 39 with tc-native 1.3.0.
Reproducible.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 1/10/24 09:20, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/01/2024 18:16, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
While testing 10.1.18 I have the remaining failing tests:
com/sun/ts/tests/servlet/api/jakarta_servlet_http/cookie/URLClient.java#setMaxAgePositiveTest
com/sun/ts/tests/servlet/pluggability/api
On 1/10/24 09:20, Mark Thomas wrote:
Yes.
This one should pass although from memory getting the setup right was
tricky.
Yes I have found a work-around and it is passing now.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi,
While testing 10.1.18 I have the remaining failing tests:
com/sun/ts/tests/servlet/api/jakarta_servlet_http/cookie/URLClient.java#setMaxAgePositiveTest
com/sun/ts/tests/servlet/pluggability/api/jakarta_servlet_http/cookie/URLClient.java#setMaxAgePositiveTest
Those 2 are due to the TCK
On 1/5/24 10:25, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.85
Tested on fedora39 with tc-native-1.2.39.
and it is reproducible.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 1/5/24 16:25, Christopher Schultz wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.18
A part the:
+++
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.TestAsyncMessagesPerformance.NIO.txt
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.TestAsyncMessagesPerformance.NIO2.txt
+++
On 12/22/23 15:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 12/22/23 11:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/12/2023 10:01, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Yep, is there an "easy" way to configure the
CharsetMapperDefault.properties used by the mapper?
Add the following to the global web.xml
On 12/22/23 11:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/12/2023 10:01, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Yep, is there an "easy" way to configure the
CharsetMapperDefault.properties used by the mapper?
Add the following to the global web.xml
ja
Shift_JIS
On 12/22/23 11:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/12/2023 10:01, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Yep, is there an "easy" way to configure the
CharsetMapperDefault.properties used by the mapper?
Add the following to the global web.xml
ja
Shift_JIS
Yes thank
On 12/22/23 10:51, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:41 AM jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 12/19/23 18:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/12/2023 13:05, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to run the TCK against Tomcat-10.1.17 I have 12 failed
tests. Before investigating I
On 12/19/23 18:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/12/2023 13:05, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to run the TCK against Tomcat-10.1.17 I have 12 failed
tests. Before investigating I have questions:
Did someone run the servlet TCK recently?
Not recently but I have run it.
Are some
On 12/19/23 18:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/12/2023 13:05, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to run the TCK against Tomcat-10.1.17 I have 12 failed
tests. Before investigating I have questions:
Did someone run the servlet TCK recently?
Not recently but I have run it.
Are some
Hi,
I have tried to run the TCK against Tomcat-10.1.17 I have 12 failed
tests. Before investigating I have questions:
Did someone run the servlet TCK recently?
Are some tests expected to fail (well for sure the
DefaultContextPathTest and the signatures, but are there others?
I have created
On 12/8/23 04:17, Christopher Schultz wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.17
Tested on fedora 38.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 12/7/23 20:44, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.84
Tested on fedora fc38 with tc-native 1.2.39.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 11/9/23 20:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] +1 Alpha - go ahead and release as 11.0.0-M14
Thanks!
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 11/9/23 23:12, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.83
Tested on fedora38...
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 10/10/23 00:18, Christopher Schultz wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.14
Tested on fedora 37 openjdk 17 with tc-native-2.0.6
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 10/9/23 23:36, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.81
tested with tc-native-1.2.39 on fedora 38
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 8/24/23 01:28, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.13
Tested on fedora 38 with open-ssl-3.0.9, tc-native-2.0.5 and open-jdk 17.0.8
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 8/24/23 01:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.80
Tested with openjdk version "17.0.8", tc-native 1.2.37 and openssl 3.0.9
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 7/6/23 16:41, Christopher Schultz wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.11
tested with tc-native 2.0.4 on fedora38
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 7/4/23 15:28, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.78
Tested on fedora 38 with OpenJDK 17 (fc38 build).
I had:
+++
[concat] Testsuites with failed tests:
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.jni.TestSocketServerAnyLocalAddress.APR.txt
[concat]
Hi,
Don't forget to submit talks ASAP to:
https://communityovercode.org/call-for-presentations/
there is a tomcat and httpd track for us.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Forwarded Message
Subject: Final Reminder: Community Over Code call for presentations
closing soon
Date: Wed, 28
On 5/4/23 16:20, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.75
Tested on fedora 37.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 4/13/23 10:42, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.74
Tested on fedora 37 with native 1.2.26
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 1/9/23 21:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.5
Tested on fedora 37.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 1/9/23 23:53, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.71
Tested on fedora 37
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 12/8/22 20:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
Ping. Just a reminder we need one more PMC vote for this release.
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.4
Tested of fedora36
Jean-Frederic
Thanks,
Mark
On 05/12/2022 17:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.4 release is now
On 12/8/22 20:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
Ping. Just a reminder we need one more PMC vote for this release.
> [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.4
Tested of fedora36
Jean-Frederic
Thanks,
Mark
On 05/12/2022 17:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.4 release is now
On 12/1/22 15:27, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.70
Test on fedora36 with tc-native-1.2.35
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 11/24/22 10:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi all,
We currently receive reports from oss-fuzz to the Tomcat security list.
There is a relatively high volume of reports with a very high false
positive rate. To date, we haven't had any valid security issues reported.
Concern has been expressed
On 11/9/22 18:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.2
Tested on fedora 36.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 11/2/22 13:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] +1: Acceptable. Go ahead and release.
Tested on fedora using 9.0.67 examples on 10.1.0 tomcat.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
On 10/7/22 11:27, Mark Thomas wrote:
Based on the above I think EOL for 8.5.x should be either 31 March 2024
+1
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 9/23/22 14:03, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.67 (stable)
Testing on fedora36
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 9/23/22 11:44, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.0 (stable)
Tested on fedora36 with tc-native 2.0.1
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 9/22/22 11:21, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.66 (stable)
Tested on fedora 36 with tc-native 1.2.35
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 14/07/2022 11:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.0.23 (stable)
Tested on fedora36
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 20/07/2022 00:16, Rainer Jung wrote:
Roughly the same pattern I saw for TC 10.0 now also seen for TC 10.1.
May be something wrong in apr? Which apr version are you using?
Am 18.07.2022 um 12:09 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Hi there,
this is just an info, at this point probably not a
On 14/07/2022 15:17, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.65 (stable)
Tested on fedora 36 with tc-native 1.2.35
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
On 13/07/2022 23:57, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Beta - go ahead and release as 10.1.0-M17 (beta)
Tested on fedora 36 ;-)
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 02/06/2022 19:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.0.22 (stable)
Tested on fedora35 and rhel6 (with my own openssl/apr on rhel6).
Note 10.0.22 not 21!!!
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
On 02/06/2022 15:22, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Beta - go ahead and release as 10.1.0-M16 (beta)
Tested on fedora 35.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 02/06/2022 21:46, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.64 (stable)
Tested on fedora35.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 31/03/2022 16:56, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.62 (stable)
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 30/03/2022 10:21, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.61 (stable)
Tested with tc-native-1.2.32 on fedora35
[jfclere@ovpn-113-163 tomcat-native-tests]$ java --version
+++
openjdk 11.0.14.1 2022-02-08
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.14.1+1)
OpenJDK
On 25/02/2022 18:14, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jean-Frederic,
Am 25.02.2022 um 17:27 schrieb jean-frederic clere:
On 21/02/2022 22:20, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.59 (stable)
Tested on fedora fc35 with openjdk version "11.0.14.1"
My tests failed wi
On 21/02/2022 19:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 10.1.0-M11 (alpha)
Tested on fedora35 with openjdk version "11.0.14.1" 2022-02-08
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 21/02/2022 22:20, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.59 (stable)
Tested on fedora fc35 with openjdk version "11.0.14.1"
My tests failed with openjdk version "1.8.0_322"
test-nio:
[junit] Unrecognized option:
--add-opens=java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED
On 15/01/2022 13:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 10.1.0-M10 (alpha)
Tested on fedora34 with openjdk version "11.0.13
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 06/12/2021 15:19, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 03/12/2021 09:49, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.56 (stable)
Tested on fedora33 with openjdk 11.0.13.
Same results for adoptium jdk8u302-b08 looks good to me.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 03/12/2021 09:49, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.56 (stable)
Tested on fedora33 with openjdk 11.0.13.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
On 21/09/2021 15:16, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 21.09.2021 um 14:39 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
Jean-Frederic,
On 9/21/21 08:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 19/09/2021 15:22, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Frederic,
On 9/19/21 03:09, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have some problems
On 19/09/2021 15:22, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Frederic,
On 9/19/21 03:09, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have some problems with let's encrypt certificates and firefox,
basically I get:
Error code: MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_REQUIRED_TLS_FEATURE_MISSING
It looks like tomcat and tomcat
Hi,
I have some problems with let's encrypt certificates and firefox,
basically I get:
Error code: MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_REQUIRED_TLS_FEATURE_MISSING
It looks like tomcat and tomcat-native are missing something with my
certificate, the same certificate with with httpd.
The work-around is
On 10/09/2021 08:10, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 06/09/2021 16:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 10.1.0-M5 (alpha)
Tested on fedora34 with adoptopenjdk jdk-11.0.12+7
Still one failure:
[concat] Testsuites with failed tests:
[concat] TEST
On 06/09/2021 16:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 10.1.0-M5 (alpha)
Tested on fedora34 with adoptopenjdk jdk-11.0.12+7
Still one failure:
[concat] Testsuites with failed tests:
[concat] TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSsl.NIO2.txt
I will have a closer look
On 06/09/2021 21:21, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.53 (stable)
Tested on fedora34 with openjdk8.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 09/08/2021 22:05, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.70
On fedora 34, I have the following failures:
+++
[concat] Testsuites with failed tests:
[concat] TEST-org.apache.catalina.valves.rewrite.TestResolverSSL.NIO.txt
[concat]
On 10/08/2021 14:02, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have the following failure with ant test:
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.APR.txt
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.NIO.txt
[concat]
TEST
On 10/08/2021 14:56, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
вт, 10 авг. 2021 г. в 15:02, jean-frederic clere :
Hi,
I have the following failure with ant test:
[concat] TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.APR.txt
[concat] TEST
On 10/08/2021 14:02, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have the following failure with ant test:
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.APR.txt
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.NIO.txt
[concat]
TEST
Hi,
I have the following failure with ant test:
[concat] TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.APR.txt
[concat] TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.NIO.txt
[concat]
TEST-org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TestSSLHostConfigCompat.NIO2.txt
[concat]
On 03/08/2021 21:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 10.1.0-M4 (alpha)
Tested on fedora34.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 31/07/2021 06:35, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.52 (stable)
tested on fedora34 with java8 and adoptium jdk8u302-b08
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 13/07/2021 11:03, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 09/07/2021 18:40, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jean-Frederic,
how do you make sure, that your tests actually land in the correct
SSLHost? You are using the same server certificate, so a check on the
client side might not be easy. I would find
protocol
server2 gets the server2 certificate but the TLSv1.1 protocol...
Use nio/nio2 the protocol is the expected one.
Best regards,
Rainer
Am 09.07.2021 um 15:33 schrieb jean-frederic clere:
On 09/07/2021 15:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Ferderic,
On 7/9/21 07:55, jean-frederic clere
On 09/07/2021 15:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Jean-Ferderic,
On 7/9/21 07:55, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 09/07/2021 12:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/07/2021 11:08, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I think we need the same fix in tomcat or I missed something?
If we need it I will work
On 09/07/2021 12:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/07/2021 11:08, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I think we need the same fix in tomcat or I missed something?
If we need it I will work on it next week ;-)
To clarify, you mean checking Tomcat can (and implementing if it can't)
the ability
Hi,
I think we need the same fix in tomcat or I missed something?
If we need it I will work on it next week ;-)
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 29/06/2021 18:22, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/06/2021 15:19, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 29/06/2021 14:45, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/06/2021 12:29, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
It seems certificateVerification="optionalNoCA" only works if the
OCSP i
On 26/06/2021 00:06, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 10.1.0-M2 (alpha)
Tested on fedora34.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 28/06/2021 10:56, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.50 (stable)
Tested on fedora fc34.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 29/06/2021 14:45, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/06/2021 12:29, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
It seems certificateVerification="optionalNoCA" only works if the OCSP
is disabled.
In
Otherwise the OCSP check forces an error becaus
Hi,
It seems certificateVerification="optionalNoCA" only works if the OCSP
is disabled.
In
Otherwise the OCSP check forces an error because it can't check anything...
How to "fix" that? Just document it? or return OK where we test
On 10/06/2021 12:19, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.48 (stable)
Tested on fedora 34
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 01/06/2021 11:53, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable, go ahead and release
Tested with fedora34 and tomcat-10.0.6
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 08/05/2021 18:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.0.6 (stable)
Tested on fedora34.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 08/05/2021 20:14, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.46
Tested on fedora34 looks OK.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 04/05/2021 14:06, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] +1: Acceptable. Go ahead and release.
tested with my test war file, works like a charm.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 04/03/2021 23:22, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.44
Tested on fedora 33.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 28/01/2021 21:48, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.43
Tested on fedora33 and rhel8.0
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi,
While testing the tomcat clustering I have noted that at the start from
time to the attribute replication is failing.
While debugging I have the messages:
+++
05-Jan-2021 10:25:07.046 FINE [Tribes-Task-Receiver[Catalina-Channel]-6]
On 05/08/2020 14:35, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 10:22 AM jean-frederic clere <mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
The Travis CI build seems to fail on timout regularly should we
increase
the timeout? Or investigate the problem?
Smoke Te
Hi,
The Travis CI build seems to fail on timout regularly should we increase
the timeout? Or investigate the problem?
Smoke Test / JDK8 ubuntu-latest fails on tls3 tests should we make the
test conditional?
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Hi folks,
The Call for Papers will close in 4 days, don't shy we are looking for
topics about how you use Tomcat, so please submit.
The conference will take place ONLINE the 29 September to 1 of October.
Check: https://acna2020.jamhosted.net/ and remember NO travels you just
need a webcam
On 06/03/2020 11:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.32
Tested on fedora32 with tc-native-1.2.23
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 16/11/2019 19:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.29 release is now available for voting.
The major changes compared to the 9.0.27 release are:
- Improvements to Async error handling
- Stricter processing of HTTP headers when looking for specific token
values
- Fix
1 - 100 of 730 matches
Mail list logo
