On May 1, 2010, at 7:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Thanks for the review. My bad. I saw we are using EPL for the JDT
compiler and assumed we'd be fine for this to. I'll see what I can do to
work around it or get the license changed.
No problem. The issue seems to have originated in BCEL...
On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
2 files in BCEL have IBM headers; these headers are presumably OK, but
the NOTICE file probably needs to mention IBM. Not sure why the BCEL
source archive does not do so
Apologies for the broadcast message...
In thinking about ApacheCon 2010, I began to wonder if there is interest in
creating an Enterprise Java track for the conference. I think there is the
potential for a lot of interesting content. Many of our projects are busy
implementing JSR specs for
On Mar 1, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Thanks for the answer Mark :)
I have started to fork the Tomcat to implement a Java EE Web Profile, called
Web Enterprise Server :)
My reasons:
1* Without touching source code it is impossible to implement such a
product.
2* I also
FYI,
Recently, while verifying a Geronimo release, I noticed that your jar
files do not contain Apache LICENSE or NOTICE files.
--kevan
On Feb 13, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
New candidate binaries are available for testing:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
On Dec 6, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
Well, that's certainly the way it ought to be, IMO. However,
the xsd's (e.g. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/
trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/j2ee_1_4.xsd) are copyrighted
I see that Tomcat binary distributions (and source tree) contains Sun
j2ee xsd's and dtd's (an ASL v2 license has even been applied to them).
Since the files are Copyrighted by Sun and state:
No part of this document may be reproduced in any form by any
means without prior written
On Dec 6, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Ah yes: if you've got access to the Foundation svn repository (ASF
Members have access), you can check out Correspondence/Sun for the
Memorandum of Understanding from 1999 that covers this I think (IANAL
of course). It's makes for fun
On Dec 6, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
I believe they're covered by Sun's intellectual property grant for
the
ASF made when they donated the initial version of Tomcat years ago.
The grant paperwork should be available electronically in the
Foundation
Bill, Bill, and Remy -- thanks for your help. I've raised bug 38030 --
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38030
FYI, I tested TC behavior with an HTTP 1.1 POST without a message body and
no content-length. It worked, properly. However, I noticed an 8 second delay
between request
On Dec 22, 2005, at 4:52 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
AFAICT, this code is assuming that there will always be a
message body in the POST Request. However, this is not
necessarily the case (and is certainly not true for the problem
at hand). Eventually,
11 matches
Mail list logo
