On Monday 21 December 2009 18:13:51 Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/12/2009 15:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > For an example of a container level lifecycle listener take a look at
> > this commit. That should give you the idea.
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=828196
>
> This migh
On Monday 21 December 2009 15:23:42 Mark Thomas wrote:
> Most do, but it doesn't appear to be required. In your circumstances,
> you could use a LifecycleListener defined at the container level that
> just called Class.forName(String).
Hi Mark,
what do you mean with "container level" here?
Rain
On Monday 21 December 2009 15:23:42 Mark Thomas wrote:
> The memory leak is caused by the DriverManager implementation. It holds
> a reference to the Driver. If the Driver was loaded by the web
> application then the Driver holds a reference to the WebappClassLoader.
> This in turn holds references
On Monday 21 December 2009 12:04:59 Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/12/2009 10:53, Rainer Frey wrote:
[...]
> > but I hoped that someone would take a
> > look at issue https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48214
> > before a release is made
>
> I hadn't forgotten that one - I just hadn't g
On Friday 07 August 2009 15:49:38 Mark Thomas wrote:
> Rainer Frey wrote:
> > 1. Revision 751496 was commented with "Tomcat uses Platform MBean server.
> > Adjust listener accordingly." and removed the separate configuration
> > for "Catalina" mbean server and registry. Was this accompanied by a
>
