On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 03:47:09PM -, confusionvalley wrote:
> I didn't told you earlier but my objective is to test a webapp that I already
> have. And I really didn't want to change that webapp or create another webapp
> to make all the fault-injection stuff. Do you think that creating anot
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:39:48PM -0700, Jalali, Alex wrote:
> Hi, Is this is a bug with tomcat or adobe Acrobat in digest auth?
I suppose neither. The real is clear text.
> But adobe Acrobat (using its upload review tool to publish to a webdav
> server) returns with a response header that has,
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:47:16PM +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >So, what are the requirement to getting a patch accepted in tomcat 5.5?
>
> As I said before, it is very unlikely I would accept such a patch (since
> it would give JSP the worst of both worlds: the hassle of compilation
> combi
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:15:17AM -0700, Preston L. Bannister wrote:
> You have to consider how (or if) to allow for long-running background
> threads. Successive requests for the same user will not use the JVM
> (whether this counts as an advantage or disadvantage is debatable). The JVM
> isn'
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:12:35PM +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >I'm currently tracking an OutOfMemory problem. We've got a web app which
> >gets OutOfMemory after some heavy use. I installed Mustang 1.6b62 on the
> >machines and had them dump heap on OOM. Then I looked into the heap dump
> >usi
Hi there,
I'm currently tracking an OutOfMemory problem. We've got a web app which
gets OutOfMemory after some heavy use. I installed Mustang 1.6b62 on the
machines and had them dump heap on OOM. Then I looked into the heap dump
using jhat.
I noticed that there are several objects hanging around
Hi Filip,
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:44:21AM -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> I wrote together a little idea (also emailed to geronimo-dev for
> feedback) on how the next generation of session replication should be done.
> Today's replication is an all-to-all replication, and within that r
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 03:24:52PM -0800, Casey Haakenson wrote:
> We have a customer who is hitting our web GUI through a fairly
> complicated SSH proxy scheme. For example, when they hit a page on our
> site such as /redirect.jsp we do a
> response.sendRedirect("/newpage.jsp"). This results in
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 03:19:58PM -0800, Costin Manolache wrote:
> Why not make MessageBytes implement CharSeq as well, for consistency ?
> And maybe even ByteChunk - we're doing some (bad) conversions and
> toString() inside already.
Please don't! It's already a PITA to get character conversion
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 07:48:43AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Modified: tomcat/sandbox/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/ByteChunk.java
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/sandbox/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/ByteChunk.java?rev=365858&r1=365857&r2=365858&view=diff
>
Hi there,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:02:37PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: remm
> Date: Tue Dec 20 09:02:33 2005
> New Revision: 358036
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=358036&view=rev
> Log:
> - Add two system properties (as given the JSP API, there is no easy solution
> t
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:39:50PM +0300, Andrievsky Dmitry wrote:
> P.P.S What seems to me interesting. Although before putting
> PageContextImpl into pool JspFactoryImpl calls pc.release(), and
> inside the method all links must become null (or not?..) and
> referenced objects must become avail
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:24:57PM -0800, Jason Novotny wrote:
> Using Tomcat 5.5.12 and my servlet context fragment:
>
> reloadable="false" crossContext="true">
>prefix="localhost_gridsphere_log." suffix=".txt" timestamp="true"/>
>
>
> doesn't seem to work-- I get this messag
Hi Costin,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 10:01:08AM -0800, Costin Manolache wrote:
> One of the problems is that jasper is a tricky piece of code, and
> usually reducing memory this way can have unexpected impact. Maybe a
> more 'moderate' approach would be more acceptable, like checking the
> size of
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 05:02:39PM +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >What do you think about this issue?
>
> It's a fine solution for your "problem", I suppose. Thanks for the
> patch, but we are not going to use it.
So could you please give me a hint, why you are not going to use it? My
"problem
Hi there,
while hunting down a memory leak (it turned out that some servlets
didn't release PageContexts after use) I came across some places in
tomcat which are a bit memory inefficent.
(I'm talking about Tomcat 5.5 SVN as of tuesday or yesterday.)
The root cause (but not the problem) is that P
16 matches
Mail list logo
