Is all of that URL spammy?
I specifically included most of the path because I thought there might be
valid content elsewhere on the site.
On 25 April 2013 13:46, Apache Wiki wrote:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for
> change notificat
On 7 May 2013 16:54, wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Tue May 7 15:54:36 2013
> New Revision: 1479953
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1479953
> Log:
> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
> Be tolerant of applications that pass CR or LF in setHeader() values.
> Fix some whi
On 15 May 2013 00:37, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Nick,
>
> On 5/14/13 6:35 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
>> I recently became a committer on the Logging project and thus I now have an
>> @apache.org address. Since it's a forwarding address, I'm having it forward
>> to my Google Apps email address (
On 14 June 2013 17:35, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 6/14/13 12:21 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 14/06/2013 16:57, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> On 6/14/13 3:16 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/06/2013 03:31, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> It might be nice if this
On 19 June 2013 09:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/06/2013 00:42, Nick Williams wrote:
>>
>> Oracle has announced a Javadoc vulnerability (CVE-2013-1571 [1],
>> VU#225657 [2]) whereby Javadoc generated with Java 5, Java 6, or Java
>> 7 < 7u25 is vulnerable to a frame injection attack. Oracle has
>>
On 19 June 2013 13:03, Nick Williams wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:15 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 19/06/2013 00:42, Nick Williams wrote:
>>> Oracle has announced a Javadoc vulnerability (CVE-2013-1571 [1],
>>> VU#225657 [2]) whereby Javadoc generated with Java 5, Java 6, or Java
>>> 7 < 7u25
On 19 June 2013 13:12, sebb wrote:
> On 19 June 2013 13:03, Nick Williams wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:15 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/06/2013 00:42, Nick Williams wrote:
>>>> Oracle has announced a Javadoc vulnerability (CVE-2013-157
On 19 June 2013 14:12, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2013/6/19 sebb :
>> On 19 June 2013 13:12, sebb wrote:
>>> On 19 June 2013 13:03, Nick Williams wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:15 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On
On 19 June 2013 15:36, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/06/2013 15:12, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 19 June 2013 14:12, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>>
>>> 2013/6/19 sebb :
>>>>
>>>> On 19 June 2013 13:12, sebb wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
On 20 June 2013 14:16, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Sebb,
>
> On 6/19/13 4:26 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 19 June 2013 09:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 19/06/2013 00:42, Nick Williams wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Oracle has announced a Javadoc vulnerability (CVE-20
On 20 June 2013 16:33, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Sebb,
>
> On 6/20/13 9:31 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 20 June 2013 14:16, Christopher Schultz
>> wrote:
>>> Sebb,
>>>
>>> On 6/19/13 4:26 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>> On 19 June 2013 09:15, Mark T
On 23 June 2013 20:24, wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Sun Jun 23 19:24:21 2013
> New Revision: 1495875
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1495875
> Log:
> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55119
> Ensure that the build process produces Javadoc that is not vulnerable to
> CVE-20
On 17 July 2013 12:59, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 11:42 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> While doing the trivial fix for
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55268, I noticed a
>> few idioms being used in bin/daemon.sh that struck me as odd. For example:
>>
On 17 July 2013 15:50, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 04:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> May I suggest a short comment is added to the script to document why
>> -z and -n are not used?
>> Someone else reading the script in the future is going to wonder the
>> same-
Regardless, please consider documenting the script to explain why it
does not use -n/-z if that is necessary to avoid bugs.
On 17 July 2013 20:26, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mladen,
>
> On 7/17/13 1:07 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> On 07/17/2013 06:05 PM, sebb wrote:
>
On 18 July 2013 10:13, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 18.07.2013 06:04, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> On 07/17/2013 11:59 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> Regardless, please consider documenting the script to explain why it
>>> does not use -n/-z if that is necessary to avoid bugs.
>&g
On 2 August 2013 20:32, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> A proposed release candidate Apache Taglibs 1.2.0-RC1 is now available for
> voting.
>
> This is release candidate for an implementation of JSTL 1.2 and can be
> obtained from the staging repo at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositori
On 21 August 2013 14:48, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Nick,
>
> On 8/20/13 8:24 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
>> I ran in to a roadblock with this idea. Part of the byte code of a
>> class includes the fully-qualified class name. If I create a class,
>> say UnweavedClass, and replace its byte code in m
On 21 August 2013 20:21, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Sebb,
>
> On 8/21/13 1:46 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 21 August 2013 14:48, Christopher Schultz
>> wrote:
>>> Nick,
>>>
>>> On 8/20/13 8:24 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
>>>> I ran in to a roa
What is the project about? Why should I be interested in it?
[rhetorical questions]
The Announce emails are sent to people not on the developer or user lists.
Most will have no idea what the project is about.
So the e-mails should contain at least brief details of what the
product does, and some
On 14 December 2017 at 15:20, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/12/17 13:18, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> Hi, Mark!
>>
>> To dev@tomcat, cc: general@gump.
>>
>>
>> The result of this change is that Gump building Tomcat downloads
>> tar.gz for Commons-Daemon from mirrors.
>
> Drat. That wasn't the intenti
Might be an idea to include a link to the main Tomcat page somewhere
in the announce?
On 25 January 2018 at 08:44, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
> Tomcat 7.0.84.
>
> Apache Tomcat is an open source software implementation of the J
On 22 February 2016 at 11:23, Mark Thomas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> CVE-2015-5345 Apache Tomcat Directory disclosure
>
> Severity: Low
>
> Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
>
> Versions Affected:
> - - Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 to 6.0.44
> - - Apache Tomcat 7.0.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13102280#comment-13102280
]
Sebb commented on MTOMCAT-87:
-
@Adrien C The patch was attached without granting the
Sebb created MTOMCAT-226:
Summary: Wasted work in AbstractCatalinaMojo#getManager()
Key: MTOMCAT-226
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-226
Project: Apache Tomcat Maven Plugin
Issue
Please update project.xml with the new location.
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 at 12:39
Subject: svn commit: r1877430 -
/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data/projects.xml
To:
Author: sebb
Date: Wed May 6 11:39:14 2020
New Revision: 1877430
URL: http
401 - 426 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
