Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.11

2017-02-09 Thread therealneworld
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 07/02/17 20:30, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> Version 1.2.10 includes the following change: >> >> - Update minimum recommended OpenSSL version to 1.0.2k >> - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.0.2k >> - Better documentation

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.2.11

2017-02-08 Thread therealneworld
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Version 1.2.10 includes the following change: > > - Update minimum recommended OpenSSL version to 1.0.2k > - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.0.2k > - Better documentation for building on Windows > (including with FIPS

Re: svn commit: r1781952 - in /tomcat/native/trunk/native: include/ssl_private.h src/ssl.c

2017-02-06 Thread therealneworld
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 06/02/17 22:55, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> On 06/02/17 21:20, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> Mark, >>> >>> If there is anything I can do to help work on the patch I will, >>> however as I mentioned in the bug I don't

Re: svn commit: r1781952 - in /tomcat/native/trunk/native: include/ssl_private.h src/ssl.c

2017-02-06 Thread therealneworld
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 06/02/17 22:55, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >> On 06/02/17 21:20, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> Mark, >>> >>> If there is anything I can do to help work on the patch I will, >>> however as I mentioned in the bug I don't

Re: svn commit: r1781952 - in /tomcat/native/trunk/native: include/ssl_private.h src/ssl.c

2017-02-06 Thread therealneworld
Mark, If there is anything I can do to help work on the patch I will, however as I mentioned in the bug I don't have a windows environment so I am basically useless if that is where the issues exist. -nate On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 06/02/17

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-28 Thread therealneworld
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 28.06.2016 um 16:07 schrieb Mark Thomas: >> >> On 28/06/2016 12:28, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> >>> On 28/06/2016 11:34, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 28.06.2016 um 11:15 schrieb Mark Thomas: >>> >>> >>> >>> >

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-27 Thread therealneworld
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:04 PM, wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> Great analysis. I was really wondering, what could make the hash map so huge >> and hadn't thought about the hash function as the problem. >> >>

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-27 Thread therealneworld
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > Am 27.06.2016 um 15:11 schrieb Mark Thomas: >> >> I believe I have an explanation for what is going on that fits both the >> reported behaviour and the proposed fix. >> >> Background >> == >> >>

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-24 Thread therealneworld
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 24/06/2016 21:52, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> I'm wondering if this is a problem that builds up over time. If I >>> understood your previous posts correctly, running the big tests >>> immediately gave ~700MB/s

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-24 Thread therealneworld
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:52 PM, wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 24/06/2016 20:01, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 24/06/2016 18:41,

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-24 Thread therealneworld
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 24/06/2016 20:01, therealnewo...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 24/06/2016 18:41, Nate Clark wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Nate Clark

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-24 Thread therealneworld
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 24/06/2016 18:41, Nate Clark wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Nate Clark wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 24/06/2016 18:25, Mark Thomas

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-24 Thread therealneworld
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 24/06/2016 11:17, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : >> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see >>> similar results and,

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-24 Thread therealneworld
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : > >> Thanks. >> >> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see >> similar results and, assuming I do, I'll start looking at fixing this >>

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-24 Thread therealneworld
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:37 AM, wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 24/06/2016 11:17, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >>> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : >>> Thanks. I'm going to start

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-24 Thread therealneworld
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 24/06/2016 11:17, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >> 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : >> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see >>> similar results and,

Re: Bug that spans tomcat and tomcat-native

2016-06-24 Thread therealneworld
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > 2016-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas : > >> Thanks. >> >> I'm going to start some local performance testing to confirm I see >> similar results and, assuming I do, I'll start looking at fixing this >>