https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #13 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com ---
Updated Tomcat 7 documentation for Realm in r1377445.
The documentation update is in 7.0.30 and later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #12 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
See comment #10
The changelog entry was missed. This has been fixed.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1348499
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #11 from Manuel Fink finkm...@googlemail.com ---
I could not find the bug 53047 in the change log for 7.0.28 or 7.0.29. Is this
still an issue? I need to implement the authOnly mode without checking any
roles.
Greetings from
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
In the end I opted to implement this for JDBCRealm and DatasourceRealm and
without any logging on Realm start.
The fixed has been applied to trunk and 7.0.x and will be included in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I suggest we define the result of that call as:
AUTH_ONLY_MODE = true
The use of AUTH_ONLY mode doe snot preclude the user from being assigned a role
and/or
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
s/No they do./No they don't./
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
It isn't quite that simple. The application may still make a call to
isUserInRole().
There may well be a special case for each realm if all of the following are
true:
- AUTH_ONLY_MODE or
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #7 from Dennis Verbeek dverb...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #6)
It isn't quite that simple. The application may still make a call to
isUserInRole().
I suggest we define the result of that call as:
AUTH_ONLY_MODE =
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #2 from Dennis Verbeek dverb...@hotmail.com 2012-04-10 10:29:13
UTC ---
When userRoleTable is not defined the JDBCRealm simply queries table null.
allRolesMode=authOnly ... It's in the title!
Realm
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
2012-04-10 17:50:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
When userRoleTable is not defined the JDBCRealm simply queries table null.
allRolesMode=authOnly ... It's in the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
2012-04-10 17:52:09 UTC ---
FWIW, JDBCRealm isn't appropriate for production use IMO. If you can, you
should switch to DataSourceRealm which performs much better.
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #5 from Dennis Verbeek dverb...@hotmail.com 2012-04-10 18:02:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
FWIW, JDBCRealm isn't appropriate for production use IMO. If you can, you
should switch to DataSourceRealm which performs much
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
2012-04-09 16:39:18 UTC ---
So if you don't provide a userRoleTable, what do you get? NPE? SQLException?
Are you using * as the user role in your security-constraint? If
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047
Dennis Verbeek dverb...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
15 matches
Mail list logo
