https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Catalina|Catalina
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #12 from Michael Osipov 1983-01...@gmx.net ---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #8)
I personally do not like use of {0} in the messages for the description
field. Especially the ones for 404 and 403. It looks
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I personally do not like use of {0} in the messages for the description
field. Especially the ones for 404 and 403. It looks like some unrelated
text
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #6 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 28920
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28920action=edit
Screen shot from Tomcat 7.0.27
Just a screen shot, for comparison. It is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #7 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 28921
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28921action=edit
Screen shot from Tomcat trunk
The same with Tomcat trunk after
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Putting this caveat in the bug and not just on the dev list:
I agree with Mark here.
The change in r1348762 is in the place where ErrorReportValve
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #9 from Michael Osipov 1983-01...@gmx.net ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #4)
Putting this caveat in the bug and not just on the dev list:
I agree with Mark here.
The change in r1348762 is in the place
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
Fixed in trunk and 7.0.x and will be included in 7.0.28 onwards.
Proposed for 6.0.x
Notes:
1. The message from the Throwable was displayed in the stack trace.
2. I modified the patch.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #3 from Michael Osipov 1983-01...@gmx.net ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Fixed in trunk and 7.0.x and will be included in 7.0.28 onwards.
Proposed for 6.0.x
Notes:
1. The message from the Throwable was displayed in the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net ---
Putting this caveat in the bug and not just on the dev list:
This might end up being a security problem, depending on what information is in
the exception message.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
Then you have already replaced / modified the error report valve and you won't
see this change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53071
--- Comment #1 from Michael Osipov 1983-01...@gmx.net 2012-04-13 09:34:41 UTC
---
This change could also be applied to Tomcat 7.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
15 matches
Mail list logo
