Re: Fwd: [Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

I've just removed it. Please don't duplicate the spam by forwarding it to the mailing list. Aha, I forgot about that part :) -chris Forwarded Message ---- Subject: [Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021

Re: Fwd: [Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

x27;t duplicate the spam by forwarding it to the mailing list. Mark -chris Forwarded Message ---- Subject: [Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 20:58:16 + From: bugzi...@apache.org Reply-To: Tomcat Developer

Fwd: [Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

All, I don't believe I have any BZ karma at all, but this user has duplicated old comments and inserted spam URLs into the comment stream. Can someone kill this stuff? -chris Forwarded Message Subject: [Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the exte

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 --- Comment #11 from jullieverma --- Since this is at best an enhancement, it can be considered fixed in Tomcat 8 which includes a rewrite valve that can easily do this sort of matching. Documentation available here: https://www.callandys.com

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 jullieverma changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://cutt.ly/Bmo9ZOE Keywor

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Mark Thoma

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 Remy Maucherat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 Benjamin Plocek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVA

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 --- Comment #7 from Remy Maucherat --- As an enhancement, it should be fine to say the rewrite valve should be used. It is a generic solution that can take care of any matching scenario, but it would be bad to add tiny proprietary extension

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 Christopher Schultz changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |INVALID --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 --- Comment #5 from Karl Peterbauer --- I think both the Servlet spec and Tomcat's implementation are quite unfortunate. Patterns like '*.jsp' or '*.my.txt' closely resemble the venerable UNIX glob style pattern matching, and consequenty th

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 Remy Maucherat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are receiving th

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 Benjamin Plocek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVA

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 --- Comment #3 from Benjamin Plocek --- Ok, but then it would be great, to get any kind of a feedback when deploying the application. When I use an invalid pattern like '/*.jsp' the server also complains. But when I use '*.my.txt' I get no

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug 56430] Extension mapping that includes a dot in the extension does not work

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz --- This is probably a spec-clarification question, really: does * match a dot? Is it greedy-matching? If it behaves like a Perl-compatible RE ".*" (or really any RE ".*"), then what you'll match is "