https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
Violeta Georgieva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
Violeta Georgieva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33230|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #21 from Huxing Zhang ---
Created attachment 33268
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33268&action=edit
Patch to restore DirContextUrlStreamHandlerFactory
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the ass
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #20 from Huxing Zhang ---
I just renamed DirContextURLStreamHandlerFactory to
TomcatURLStreamHandlerFactory, which might not be good for backward
compatibility.
I will restore DirContextURLStreamHandlerFactory in my next patch.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #19 from Violeta Georgieva ---
(In reply to Huxing Zhang from comment #18)
> Created attachment 33230 [details]
> patch including latest ConfigFileLoader enhancement.
Hi,
Please do not remove DirContextURLStreamHandlerFactory, use
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
Violeta Georgieva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33220|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
Violeta Georgieva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33193|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #18 from Huxing Zhang ---
Created attachment 33230
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33230&action=edit
patch including latest ConfigFileLoader enhancement.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #17 from Mark Thomas ---
Yep, that is pretty much the solution I came up with.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To uns
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #16 from Huxing Zhang ---
(In reply to Violeta Georgieva from comment #15)
> (In reply to Huxing Zhang from comment #14)
> > Created attachment 33220 [details]
> > patch that also avoid bug 58518
> >
> > Well, since Mark has alread
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #15 from Violeta Georgieva ---
(In reply to Huxing Zhang from comment #14)
> Created attachment 33220 [details]
> patch that also avoid bug 58518
>
> Well, since Mark has already fixed bug 58518, I have also back ported this
> fix
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #14 from Huxing Zhang ---
Created attachment 33220
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33220&action=edit
patch that also avoid bug 58518
Well, since Mark has already fixed bug 58518, I have also back ported this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #13 from Huxing Zhang ---
Okay, just give me some time to look into this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To un
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #12 from Violeta Georgieva ---
Hi,
You may want to see this issue 58518 which seems to be connected with this
feature.
Best Regards,
Violeta Georgieva
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
Huxing Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33192|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #10 from Huxing Zhang ---
Created attachment 33192
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33192&action=edit
back port fix of bug 56777 to tomcat 7.0.x
back port fix of bug 56777 to tomcat 7.0.x.
Allow trust stores,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #9 from Huxing Zhang ---
Hi folks, I will try to do the back-port to tomcat 7.x.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To u
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
Andy Wilkinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone||---
Product|Tomcat 8
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
Andy Wilkinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
This has now been implemented in trunk. It will be back-ported to 8.0.x but
that is not a simple svn merge because of the TLS refactoring that took place
between 8.0.x and trunk. Still on track to have that d
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #5 from Andy Wilkinson ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #4)
> I've done some quick tests and it looks like URL support is doable without
> breaking backwards compatability.
Excellent
> I'm going to add support for "class
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
I've done some quick tests and it looks like URL support is doable without
breaking backwards compatability. I'm going to add support for "classpath:"
URLs at the same time since a number of examples I've see
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #3 from Andy Wilkinson ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #2)
> 1. In an ideal world, which Tomcat versions would you like this in? 8.0.x
> obviously. What about 7.0.x and 6.0.x? (a back-port to 6.0.x is unlikely
> without a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
Coming back to this having been prompted about it at $work. It doesn't look to
be as big a task as I first thought. Some questions.
1. In an ideal world, which Tomcat versions would you like this in? 8.0.x
o
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@boxfuse.com
--- Comment #1 from
26 matches
Mail list logo