https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68947
--- Comment #9 from romain.manni-bucau ---
Happens on tomcat-coyote (for people not using embed jars and trying to keep an
"unified"/consistent package naming).
Main issue is that the tomcat requirement is java N (11, 17 for other versions)
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68947
--- Comment #8 from Jack ---
> Jack, are you having an actual problem, or just reporting that we have a
> yucky file in our distribution?
The latter - the library performs fine.
However - the validation rules that are configured in my
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68947
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #7 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68947
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #6 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68947
--- Comment #3 from Michael Osipov ---
Though, I didn't take a look isn't that why we MRJARs have been invented and we
didn't use that feature so far?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68947
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #1)
> That's Java 22 actually. Java 11 is supported.
Thanks, amended
> Is there an actual problem or are you asking because of your validation
> rules ?
The latter.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68947
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|`tomcat-embed-core` |`tomcat-embed-core`
