On 01/05/2010 22:08, Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 1, 2010, at 7:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Thanks for the review. My bad. I saw we are using EPL for the JDT
compiler and assumed we'd be fine for this to. I'll see what I can do to
work around it or get the license changed.
No problem. The issue
On 30/04/2010 23:37, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
2 files in BCEL have IBM headers; these headers are presumably OK, but
the NOTICE file probably needs to mention IBM. Not sure
A little later than it should have been. The result of this vote was
broken due to a number of licensing issues. RC2 will follow once these
have been resolved.
Mark
On 14/04/2010 11:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
alternative
On May 1, 2010, at 7:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Thanks for the review. My bad. I saw we are using EPL for the JDT
compiler and assumed we'd be fine for this to. I'll see what I can do to
work around it or get the license changed.
No problem. The issue seems to have originated in BCEL...
On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
2 files in BCEL have IBM headers; these headers are presumably OK, but
the NOTICE file probably needs to mention IBM. Not sure why the BCEL
source archive does not do so
2010/4/14 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
[X] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
[ ] Stable - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
I
On 15/04/2010 02:17, Ivan wrote:
Usually, I trust the real codes more :-)
Just grep the Tomcat trunk codes with 'ServletContainerInitializer', I only
found an empty if block in AnnotationProcessor.java file.
That's in the tomcat-lite module.
I can't find a reference to
On 15/04/2010 01:31, sebb wrote:
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
...
There is a minor problem with the bin/tomcat-juli.jar - the NOTICE says:
Copyright 19...@year@
I'll take a look.
Same problem in
On 04/14/2010 07:22 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2010 11:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
[X] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
[ ] Stable - go ahead and
On 15/04/2010, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 15/04/2010 01:31, sebb wrote:
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
...
There is a minor problem with the bin/tomcat-juli.jar - the NOTICE
says:
Copyright
On 04/15/2010 02:44 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 04/14/2010 07:22 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2010 11:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
[X] Beta - go ahead and release
All,
After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
alternative approach and use explicit release candidates for 7.0.x. I'm
expecting to tweak the release process as we go.
The first Tomcat 7 release candiate is ready for testing. 7.0.0-RC1 can
be obtained from:
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
All,
After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
alternative approach and use explicit release candidates for 7.0.x. I'm
expecting to tweak the release process as we go.
The first Tomcat 7 release candiate is
On 14/04/2010 12:02, sebb wrote:
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Please test this release candidate and provide feedback.
Some bugs reported against Tomcat 7 may require API changes to fix.
Are API changes going to be possible once the RC has been released?
Yes. I still
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
[ ] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
[X] Stable - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
alternative approach and use explicit release candidates for 7.0.x. I'm
expecting to tweak the release process as we go.
The first Tomcat 7 release candiate is ready for
On 14/04/2010 14:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
[X] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
The APR gives some
On 14/04/2010, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
[ ] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
[X] Stable
On 04/14/2010 03:35 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The APR gives some errors for example Address already in usenull:8080
on my Linux box. All other test/plaforms look ok.
Seems you have a broken linux box :)
Here is mine dump on RHEL-5
Apr 14,
On 04/14/2010 04:13 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 04/14/2010 03:35 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The APR gives some errors for example Address already in usenull:8080
on my Linux box. All other test/plaforms look ok.
Seems you have a broken linux
On 14/04/2010 11:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
[X] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
[ ] Stable - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
The
On 14.04.2010 16:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apr 14, 2010 4:12:16 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina startInternal
INFO: Server startup in 965 ms
^^
Impressive!
Cheers,
Rainer
-
To
On 04/14/2010 08:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.04.2010 16:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apr 14, 2010 4:12:16 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina
startInternal
INFO: Server startup in 965 ms
^^
Impressive!
8 core i7 does the remaining :)
Cheers
--
^TM
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/7.0.0-RC1
Apr 14, 2010 9:00:34 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployWAR
INFO: Deploying web application archive webtest.war
Apr 14, 2010 9:00:34 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig
deployDirectory
INFO: Deploying web application
On 14.04.2010 20:52, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 04/14/2010 08:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.04.2010 16:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apr 14, 2010 4:12:16 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina
startInternal
INFO: Server startup in 965 ms
^^
Impressive!
8 core i7 does the remaining :)
Naaa,
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
All,
After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
alternative approach and use explicit release candidates for 7.0.x. I'm
expecting to tweak the release process as we go.
The first Tomcat 7 release candiate is
On 04/14/2010 01:58 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.04.2010 20:52, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 04/14/2010 08:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.04.2010 16:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apr 14, 2010 4:12:16 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina
startInternal
INFO: Server startup in 965 ms
^^
Impressive!
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
Many of the java and xml files in tomcat-lite don't have AL headers.
Not an issue. tomcat-lite isn't being shipped (at least it shoudln't be..)
It's currently in the source archives.
Also, SVN is considered
On 14/04/2010 22:22, sebb wrote:
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
Many of the java and xml files in tomcat-lite don't have AL headers.
Not an issue. tomcat-lite isn't being shipped (at least it shoudln't be..)
It's currently in the
On 14/04/2010 21:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
2 files in BCEL have IBM headers; these headers are presumably OK, but
the NOTICE file probably needs to mention IBM. Not sure why the BCEL
source archive does not do so in its NOTICE file. That might be an
error.
Hmm.
On 4/14/2010 4:22 PM, sebb wrote:
Also, SVN is considered by some to be publishing code (e.g. links are
usually published on the web-site) so better safe than sorry.
SVN is a development/work product area. Although now we have dist.apache.org/
which is, pretty clearly, a dist'ribution point
On 4/14/2010 5:32 PM, sebb wrote:
On 14/04/2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 4/14/2010 4:22 PM, sebb wrote:
Also, SVN is considered by some to be publishing code (e.g. links are
usually published on the web-site) so better safe than sorry.
SVN is a
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
...
There is a minor problem with the bin/tomcat-juli.jar - the NOTICE says:
Copyright 19...@year@
I'll take a look.
Same problem in extras/tomcat-juli-adapters.jar
Hi,
Just wonder does Tomcat 7 RC fully support Servlet 3.0 ? The last time I
check it, it seems that ServletContainerInitializer has not been implemented
yet.
Thanks !
2010/4/15 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 14/04/2010, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
The RELEASE-NOTES file says:
snip
=
Bundled APIs:
=
A standard installation of Tomcat 7.0 makes all of the following APIs available
for use by web applications (by placing them in lib):
snip
* servlet-api.jar (Servlet 3.0 API)
snip
On 15/04/2010, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Usually, I trust the real codes more :-)
Just grep the Tomcat trunk codes with 'ServletContainerInitializer', I only
found an empty if block in AnnotationProcessor.java file.
2010/4/15 sebb seb...@gmail.com
The RELEASE-NOTES file says:
snip
=
Bundled APIs:
=
A
On 15/04/2010, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
Usually, I trust the real codes more :-)
Just grep the Tomcat trunk codes with 'ServletContainerInitializer', I only
found an empty if block in AnnotationProcessor.java file.
In that case maybe you have found a discrepancy between the release
notes
37 matches
Mail list logo
